Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaddini, L.
Right arrow Articles by Rocchi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaddini, L.
Right arrow Articles by Rocchi, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis vol. 10 no. 3 pp. 257-260, 1995
© 1995 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press


research-article

Study of the relationships between common fragile sites, chromosome breakages and sister chromatid exchanges

Lucia Gaddini1, Franca Pelliccia1,3, M. Zaira Limongi1 and Angela Rocchi1,2

1Dipartimento di Genetica e Biologia Molecolare 2Centro di Genetica Evoluzionistica del CNR, Universita ‘La Sapienza’ P. le Aldo Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy

This paper reports the results of an investigation into the relationship between common fragile sites and sister chromatid exchanges (SCE). Human leukocyte cultures were grown in two different media, one complete (RPMI 1640) and one deficient in folic acid and thymidine (199M). Some of the cultures were treated with DAPI, a non-intercalating compound which binds preferentially to the AT bases of DNA and is capable of inducing fragile sites. Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) was added to all the cultures for SCE analysis. Chromomycin A3 was used for mapping lesions and SCEs by R-banding. A total of 400 cells was examined. The main results show that: BrdU, probably by re-equilibrating the unbalanced nucleotide pool of the 199 culture medium, interferes with the synergism between this culture medium and DAPI in inducing the expression of fragile sites; the SCE frequency per cell is not increased by DAPI in both culture media, therefore this compound does not seem to cause any damage to the DNA and seems merely to act by inhibiting the normal condensation of a subset of fragile sites that possess DAPI-specific base sequences; even in the absence of chromosomal lesions, the fragile sites are significantly preferred as SCE sites to non-fragile sites, whereas in the presence of a lesion, both fragile and non-fragile sites have the same likelihood of undergoing SCE. All this indicates that the presence of a lesion strongly favours SCE formation and that common fragile sites are probably chromosome regions preferentially damaged during the S phase.

3To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
P Morales-Ramirez, R Rodriguez-Reyes, E Toribio-Escobedo, C Olvera-Nestor, and B Garcia-Firo
Mechanism of in vivo sister-chromatid exchange induction by 5-azacytidine
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2007; 22(3): 177 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
Z. Li, A. Yu, and A. M. Weiner
Adenovirus Type 12-Induced Fragility of the Human RNU2 Locus Requires p53 Function
J. Virol., May 1, 1998; 72(5): 4183 - 4191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
A. Palin, R Critcher, D. Fitzgerald, J. Anderson, and C. Farr
Direct cloning and analysis of DNA sequences from a region of the Chinese hamster genome associated with aphidicolin-sensitive fragility
J. Cell Sci., January 6, 1998; 111(12): 1623 - 1634.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.