Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (38)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bu-Abbas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ioannides, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bu-Abbas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ioannides, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis vol. 11 no. 6 pp. 597-603, 1996
© 1996 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press


research-article

A comparison of the antimutagenic potential of green, black and decaffeinated teas: contribution of flavanols to the antimutagenic effect

A. Bu-Abbas1, X. Nunez1, M.N. Clifford2, R. Walker2 and C. Ioannides3

1Molecular Toxicology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Surrey Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XH, UK 2Food Science Groups, School of Biological Sciences, University of Surrey Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XH, UK

The present study was undertaken to compare the antimutagenic activity of aqueous extracts, at the concentrations used for human consumption, from green, black and decaffeinated black tea. Antimutagenic potential was evaluated against three indirect-acting dietary carcinogens, Glu-P-1, benzo(a)pyrene and nitrosopyrroudine. All three types of tea gave rise to strong and concentration-dependent suppression of the mutagenicity of the three premutagens in the presence of an activation system. No major difference in the antimutagenic potential of the three types of tea could be discerned. Black tea, decaffeinated black tea and, to a lesser extent, green tea also antagonized the mutagenicity of the direct-acting mutagen 9-aminoacridine. All three types of tea inhibited markedly the NADPHdependent reduction of cytochrome c and the O-dealkylations of ethoxy-, methoxy- and, to a much lesser extent, pentoxy-resorufin. When the microsomal metabolism was terminated, after the metabolic activation of the premutagens, incorporation of the aqueous tea extracts into the activation system caused a concentration-dependent suppression of mutagenic response. No significant difference in the antimutagenic activity of the three types of tea in this system was evident. Bearing in mind the much higher concentration of flavanols in green tea compared with the black teas, it may be concluded either that these compounds are unlikely to be the major tea components responsible for the antimutagenic, and possibly anticarcinogenic, properties of tea or that their fermentation products are similarly active.

3To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
V. Yoxall, M. Umachandran, J. Wilson, P. Kentish, and C. Ioannides
Black tea intake modulates the excretion of urinary mutagens in rats exposed to 6-aminochrysene: induction of cytochromes P450 by 6-aminochrysene in the rat
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2005; 20(1): 23 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
V. R. Yoxall, J. Bishop, and C. Ioannides
Effect of Black Tea Intake on the Excretion of Mutagens in the Urine of Volunteers Taking a Beef Meal
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2004; 13(12): 2196 - 2202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
F. Catterall, E. Copeland, M. N. Clifford, and C. Ioannides
Effects of black tea theafulvins on aflatoxin B1 mutagenesis in the Ames test
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2003; 18(2): 145 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.