Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by González-Cid, M.
Right arrow Articles by Larripa, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by González-Cid, M.
Right arrow Articles by Larripa, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 14, No. 1, 63-66, January 1999
© 1999 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Comparison of the aneugenic effect of vinorelbine and vincristine in cultured human lymphocytes

Marcela González-Cid1, María Teresa Cuello and Irene Larripa

Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Investigaciones Hematológicas `Mariano R.Castex', Academia Nacional de Medicina, Pacheco de Melo 3081, 1425 Buenos Aires, Argentina

Vinca alkaloids are used clinically against a variety of hematological and solid tumors. These compounds interact with tubulin subunits to prevent microtubule assembly, inducing abnormal chromosome segregation in dividing cells and causing aneuploidy. The vinca alkaloid vincristine sulfate (VCR) and the semisynthetic analog vinorelbine (VRB) were studied by analysis of micronuclei (MN) in cultured human lymphocytes using the cytokinesis block method. Futhermore, fluorescence in situ hybridization with a human alphoid satellite pancentromeric DNA probe was used to detect centromeres in isolated MN of VRB- or VCR-treated lymphocytes. At all the doses tested, both chemicals induced a significant increase in MN frequencies in binucleated (BN) cells (P < 0.001). The maximal effect was reached at a dose of 0.50 µg/ml. At this dose, VRB produced an ~5-fold increase with respect to the control frequency of MN, while with VCR, this frequency increased 10-fold. Both drugs produced a slowing of the cell cycle, causing a decrease in the percentage of BN cells. This effect was lower with VRB. The percentages of centromere-positive MN were 89.79 and 87.60% in VRB- and VCR-treated cultures, respectively (control 27.03%). The high percentage of positive-signals in treated cultures (P < 0.001) indicates that the MN contained whole chromosomes. Our results confirm the aneugenic mode of action of these chemicals, VRB having less genetic effect.

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +54 1 805 8803; Fax: +54 1 803 9475; Email: postmaster{at}anmra.sld.ar


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
H. Norppa and G. C.-M. Falck
What do human micronuclei contain?
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2003; 18(3): 221 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
K. S. Cunha, M. L. Reguly, U. Graf, and H. H. R. de Andrade
Taxanes: the genetic toxicity of paclitaxel and docetaxel in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2001; 16(1): 79 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
C. Andrianopoulos, G. Stephanou, E. Politi, and N.A. Demopoulos
Evaluation and characterization of micronuclei induced by the antitumour agent ASE [3{beta}-hydroxy-13{alpha}-amino-13,17-seco-5{alpha}-androstan-17-oic-13,17-lactam-p-bis(2-chloroethyl)amino phenylacetate] in human lymphocyte cultures
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2000; 15(3): 215 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.