Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, G.J.S.
Right arrow Articles by Parry, J.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, G.J.S.
Right arrow Articles by Parry, J.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 14, No. 5, 439-448, September 1999
© 1999 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press


Review

The restriction site mutation assay: a review of the methodology development and the current status of the technique

G.J.S. Jenkins1, H.S. Suzen, R.A. Sueiro and J.M. Parry

School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK

The restriction site mutation (RSM) assay has been employed in our laboratory, as a mutation detection system, since its first description in 1990. In principle the technique is capable of detecting mutations in ubiquitous restriction enzyme sites and is, therefore, readily applicable to any sequenced gene and/or organism. The RSM assay has been applied in our laboratory in various species, detecting rare mutations induced in mouse, rat, Xenopus, flatfish and human cells and tissues. This paper reviews the data accumulated by the RSM methodology in our hands and charts the developmental processes which have steadily improved the technique such that it is now applicable as a sensitive genotypic mutation detection system. This paper also includes PCR primer sequences and restriction enzymes employed in mutational analyses performed in the various species studied. We detail a variety of problems associated with the assay and the steps taken to solve them. The specific hurdles which have been overcome include the lack of quantitative data, the question of the contribution of DNA adducts to the induced mutation profile and the presence of false positives. Finally, the methods which have been developed to increase the sensitivity of the assay are also detailed. This paper describes our recommended RSM methodology, as it is routinely employed in our laboratory, which enables the analyses of mutations induced by chemical exposures and spontaneous endogenous processes. Our aim in presenting the developmental data on the RSM assay is to provide other researchers with sufficient information about the RSM methodology to facilitate its application in mutation analysis in other genes and organisms.

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 1792 205678; Fax: +44 1792 295447; Email: g.j.jenkins{at}swansea.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
G.J.S. Jenkins, S.H. Doak, G.E. Johnson, E. Quick, E.M. Waters, and J.M. Parry
Do dose response thresholds exist for genotoxic alkylating agents?
Mutagenesis, November 1, 2005; 20(6): 389 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
G.J.S. Jenkins
REVIEW The restriction site mutation (RSM) method: clinical applications
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2004; 19(1): 3 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
H.-L. Song, G. J.S. Jenkins, J. Ashby, H. Tinwell, and J. M. Parry
The application of the restriction site mutation assay to compare 1-ethyl-1-nitrosourea-induced mutations between the endogenous p53 gene and the transgenic LacZ gene in MutaMouse testes
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2001; 16(1): 59 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.