Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelecsényi, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Caspary, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelecsényi, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Caspary, W. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 15, No. 1, 25-31, January 2000
© 2000 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Molecular analysis of 5-azacytidine-induced variants in mammalian cells

Zsolt Kelecsényi1,2, Diane L. Spencer1 and William J. Caspary1,*

1 Cancer Genetics Group, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA and 2 Orszagos Kemiai Biztonsagi Intezet Gyali ut 2–6, Budapest 1966, Hungary

5-Azacytidine induces 6-thioguanine resistance in AS52 cells. To characterize these resistant clones, we isolated 148 of them from 50 independently treated flasks. Less than nine (6%) of the 148 variants were spontaneous. PCR amplification of the DNA primers flanking the gpt gene produced no product in 15 clones (10%). Of the 133 remaining clones, 52 showed sequence alterations in the gpt structural gene. Of these 52, 34 (65%) were GC->CG transversions. Only seven were located in CpG sequences. Thus, methyltransferase complexes are not major contributors to 5-azacytidine-induced point mutations in AS52 cells. The remaining 81 clones had no sequence alterations within the coding region of the gpt gene. Southern blot analysis of a sample of these variants (37/81) indicated that the 6-thioguanine-resistant phenotype was not due to local rearrangements or deletions (resolution 50 bp). Sequence analysis of the early promoter region of another sample of these variants (24/81) indicated that lesions in the promoter could not be responsible for the 6-thioguanine resistance observed. Thus, a majority of these variants were formed via a mechanism other than small genomic rearrangements, point mutations or deletions of the gpt structural gene or its promoter. Neither the mechanisms leading to these variants nor the biological and morphological consequences of these variants are known.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 919 541 2150; Fax: +1 919 541 2242; Email: caspary{at}niehs.nih.gov


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. H. Lee, S. Yegnasubramanian, X. Lin, and W. G. Nelson
Procainamide Is a Specific Inhibitor of DNA Methyltransferase 1
J. Biol. Chem., December 9, 2005; 280(49): 40749 - 40756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.