Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valverde, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rojas, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Valverde, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rojas, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 16, No. 3, 265-270, May 2001
© 2001 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Is the capacity of lead acetate and cadmium chloride to induce genotoxic damage due to direct DNA–metal interaction?

Mahara Valverde, Cristina Trejo1, and Emilio Rojas2,

Departamento de Genética y Toxicología Ambiental, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas and 1 Instituto de Fisiología Celular, UNAM Ciudad Universitaria, CP 04510, México D.F., Mexico

Even though the toxic effects of lead and cadmium compounds have been studied over many years, inconsistent results have been obtained about their mutagenic, clastogenic and carcinogenic properties. However, these metals are considered to be potential human carcinogens. The mechanism of metal-induced carcinogenesis is still unknown, but one possible pathway may involve the interaction of metals with DNA, either directly or indirectly. In this work we explore the capacity of lead, cadmium or a mixture of both metals to interact with acellular DNA, by employing a variant of the comet assay. Our results, using low non-cytotoxic metal concentrations (0.01, 0.1 and 1.0 µM) with the standard protocol for the acellular assay, showed an induction of DNA damage in cells of all organs studied; however, basal DNA damage was different in each organ. To confirm that we were working with pure DNA, proteinase K was added to the lysis solution. With this enriched-lysis solution we found a negative response in the induction of DNA damage in cells derived from the liver, kidney and lung of CD-1 male mice. To support the results obtained by the enriched-acellular assay, we studied the capacity of lead and cadmium (0.1 µM) to induce breaks in pooled genomic DNA in cells of the same organs, with negative results. Consistent with these findings, these metals do not induce DNA breaks in the plasmid pUSE amp+. On the whole, we did not detect direct induction of DNA strand breaks by lead acetate, cadmium chloride or a mixture of both metals, all at low non-cytotoxic concentrations. However, we found an induction of lipid peroxidation and an increase in free radical levels in the different organs of CD-1 male mice after inhalation of lead acetate (0.0068 µg/cc) or cadmium chloride (0.08 µg/cc) for 1 h, suggesting the induction of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity by indirect interactions, such as oxidative stress.

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: emilior{at}servidor.unam.mx


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
M. Alghazal, I Sutiakova, N Kovalkovicova, J Legath, M Falis, J Pistl, R Sabo, K Benova, L Sabova, and P Vaczi
Induction of micronuclei in rat bone marrow after chronic exposure to lead acetate trihydrate
Toxicology and Industrial Health, October 1, 2008; 24(9): 587 - 593.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
A. Celik, U. Comelekoglu, and S. Yalin
A study on the investigation of cadmium chloride genotoxicity in rat bone marrow using micronucleus test and chromosome aberration analysis
Toxicology and Industrial Health, October 1, 2005; 21(9): 243 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.