Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zeljezic, D.
Right arrow Articles by Garaj-Vrhovac, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zeljezic, D.
Right arrow Articles by Garaj-Vrhovac, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 16, No. 4, 359-363, July 2001
© 2001 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Chromosomal aberration and single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet) assay in the longitudinal risk assessment of occupational exposure to pesticides

Davor Zeljezic,1 and Vera Garaj-Vrhovac

Laboratory for Mutagenesis, Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Ksaverska 2, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

In recent years the use of pesticides in agriculture has been increasing steadily. At present there are more than 1000 chemicals classified as pesticides. Therefore, the widespread use of pesticides and their potential genetic hazard suggests that evaluation of their genotoxicity should be extended using the newer assays now available. In the present study chromosomal aberration analysis and the alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet) assay were used to evaluate the extent of DNA damage and DNA repair in peripheral blood lymphocytes of subjects employed in pesticide production. In order to determine possible primary genotoxic effects in workers blood samples were taken after an 8 month long period of exposure to a complex mixture of pesticides. To detect the possible occurrence of DNA repair in lymphocytes of the same subjects the second blood sample was taken after an 8 month long period of absence from the pesticide exposure zone. Regardless of the period of sampling, in the exposed group statistically significantly increased numbers of aberrant cells, chromatid and chromosome breaks, acentric fragments and dicentric chromosomes compared with the controls were found. After the workers had spent 8 months out of the pesticide exposure zone the number of aberrant cells and all types of chromatid and chromosome aberrations decreased significantly compared with sampling after the high exposure period, but it still remained significantly higher in comparison with the control group. After the period of high exposure to a mixture of pesticides statistically significantly increased levels of DNA damage in the Comet assay in terms of tail length and tail moment were found. After the workers were removed from production for 8 months both Comet assay end-points decreased significantly compared with the first sampling point, but they remained increased compared with the control.

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +385 1 4673 188; Fax: +385 1 4673 303; Email: dzeljezi{at}imi.hr


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
J. da Silva, C. R. Moraes, V. D. Heuser, V. M. Andrade, F. R. Silva, K. Kvitko, V. Emmel, P. Rohr, D. L. Bordin, A. C. Andreazza, et al.
Evaluation of genetic damage in a Brazilian population occupationally exposed to pesticides and its correlation with polymorphisms in metabolizing genes
Mutagenesis, September 1, 2008; 23(5): 415 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
J Gomes, O. Lloyd, and Z Hong
Oral exposure of male and female mice to formulations of organophosphorous pesticides: congenital malformations
Human and Experimental Toxicology, March 1, 2008; 27(3): 231 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
cfpHome page
M. Sanborn, K.J. Kerr, L.H. Sanin, D.C. Cole, K.L. Bassil, and C. Vakil
Non-cancer health effects of pesticides: Systematic review and implications for family doctors
Can Fam Physician, October 1, 2007; 53(10): 1712 - 1720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
R. Naravaneni and K. Jamil
Determination of AChE levels and genotoxic effects in farmers occupationally exposed to pesticides
Human and Experimental Toxicology, September 1, 2007; 26(9): 723 - 731.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
S. Bull, K. Fletcher, A.R. Boobis, and J.M. Battershill
Evidence for genotoxicity of pesticides in pesticide applicators: a review
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2006; 21(2): 93 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
S. Pastor, A. Creus, T. Parron, A. Cebulska-Wasilewska, C. Siffel, S. Piperakis, and R. Marcos
Biomonitoring of four European populations occupationally exposed to pesticides: use of micronuclei as biomarkers
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2003; 18(3): 249 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
P. Grover, K. Danadevi, M. Mahboob, R. Rozati, B. S. Banu, and M.F. Rahman
Evaluation of genetic damage in workers employed in pesticide production utilizing the Comet assay
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2003; 18(2): 201 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
C. Bolognesi, E. Perrone, and E. Landini
Micronucleus monitoring of a floriculturist population from western Liguria, Italy
Mutagenesis, September 1, 2002; 17(5): 391 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.