Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Falck, G. C.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Norppa, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Falck, G. C.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Norppa, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 17, No. 2, 111-117, March 2002
© 2002 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Nature of anaphase laggards and micronuclei in female cytokinesis-blocked lymphocytes

Ghita C.-M. Falck1, Julia Catalán1,2 and Hannu Norppa1,3

1 Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Toxicology, Department of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41 a A, FIN-00250 Helsinki, Finland and 2 Department of Anatomy, Embryology and Genetics, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

We used pancentromeric fluorescence in situ hybridization and X chromosome painting to characterize late anaphase aberrations in cultured (72 h) female lymphocytes in the presence of cytochalasin B (Cyt-B). Aberrant cells, mostly containing laggards, were very common (34.5%) among multipolar anaphases but fewer (5.4%) among bipolar anaphases. Characterization of the laggards showed that 75% were autosomes, 15% autosomal fragments and 10% X chromosomes in bipolar divisions; similar figures were obtained in multipolar cells. The X chromosome lagged behind more often than would be expected by chance (1/23), representing 12 and 7% of all lagging chromosomes in bipolar and multipolar divisions, respectively. Bipolar divisions contained more lagging autosomes but fewer lagging fragments and X chromosomes with Cyt-B than without it. Comparison of the frequencies of anaphase laggards and interphase micronuclei (MN) showed that lagging autosomes seldom form MN in bipolar divisions, 11% being micronucleated without Cyt-B and 8% with Cyt-B. In multipolar divisions, autosome laggards produced MN more often (35%) and were mainly responsible for the excessive MN frequency of multinucleate cells. Lagging acentric fragments frequently formed MN, with a higher efficiency in the presence of Cyt-B (65% bipolar, 58% multipolar) than in its absence (41%). X chromosome laggards were very easily micronucleated, half of them forming MN in untreated cells and seemingly all after Cyt-B treatment. Our findings suggest that most autosome laggards are merely delayed in their poleward movement, eventually being engulfed by the nucleus. Lagging fragments and X chromosomes are probably detached from the spindle and, therefore, preferentially form MN. X laggards are particularly efficiently micronucleated in Cyt-B-treated cells, perhaps because they stay further away from the poles in round cytokinesis-blocked anaphases than in normally elongated non-blocked anaphases.

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +358 9 47472336; Fax: +358 9 47472110; Email: hannu.norppa{at}occuphealth.fi


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. A. Janicke, L. Lasko, R. Oldenbourg, and J. R. LaFountain Jr
Chromosome Malorientations after Meiosis II Arrest Cause Nondisjunction
Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2007; 18(5): 1645 - 1656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
H. Norppa and G. C.-M. Falck
What do human micronuclei contain?
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2003; 18(3): 221 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.