Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bolognesi, C.
Right arrow Articles by Landini, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bolognesi, C.
Right arrow Articles by Landini, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 17, No. 5, 391-397, September 2002
© 2002 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Micronucleus monitoring of a floriculturist population from western Liguria, Italy

Claudia Bolognesi1, Emanuela Perrone and Eleonora Landini

Unità di Valutazione Tossicologica, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, IST, Largo R.Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy

A biomonitoring study was carried out to investigate whether exposure to complex pesticide mixtures in ornamental crop production represents a potential genotoxic risk. Exposed and control subjects were selected in western Liguria (Italy). The area was chosen for its intensive use of pesticides. The main crops produced were roses, mimosas, carnations and chrysanthemums, as ornamental non-edible plants, and tomato, lettuce and basil, as edible ones. The levels of micronuclei (MN) were analysed in peripheral blood lymphocytes of 107 floriculturists (92 men and 15 women) and 61 control subjects (42 men and 19 women). A statistically significant increase in binucleated cells with micronuclei (BNMN) was detected in floriculturists with respect to the control population (4.41 ± 2.14 MN/1000 cells versus 3.04 ± 2.14, P < 0.001). The mean number of BNMN varied as a function of sex and age. Smoking habit had no effect on MN frequency. A positive correlation between years of farming and MN frequency in peripheral blood lymphocytes was observed (r = 0.30, P = 0.02). The conditions of exposure were also associated with an increase in cytogenetic damage, with a 28% higher MN frequency in greenhouse workers compared with subjects working only outdoors in fields. Workers not using protective measures during high exposure activities showed an increase in MN frequency. Our findings suggest a potential genotoxic risk due to pesticide exposure.

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +39 0105600215; Email: claudia.bolognesi{at}istge.it


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
F. Giannandrea, L. Settimi, and I. Figa Talamanca
The use of personal protective equipment in pregnant greenhouse workers
Occup. Med., January 1, 2008; 58(1): 52 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
C. Costa, J. P. Teixeira, S. Silva, J. Roma-Torres, P. Coelho, J. Gaspar, M. Alves, B. Laffon, J. Rueff, and O. Mayan
Cytogenetic and molecular biomonitoring of a Portuguese population exposed to pesticides
Mutagenesis, September 1, 2006; 21(5): 343 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
S. Bull, K. Fletcher, A.R. Boobis, and J.M. Battershill
Evidence for genotoxicity of pesticides in pesticide applicators: a review
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2006; 21(2): 93 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
K Islas-Gonzalez, C Gonzalez-Horta, B Sanchez-Ramirez, E Reyes-Aragon, and M Levario-Carrillo
In vitro assessment of the genotoxicity of ethyl paraoxon in newborns and adults
Human and Experimental Toxicology, June 1, 2005; 24(6): 319 - 324.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.