Mutagenesis, Vol. 17, No. 6, 489-493,
November 2002
© 2002 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press
Repair of oxidative DNA damage: assessing its contribution to cancer prevention
Rowett Research Institute, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 0RD, UK and 1 Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
DNA repair is a crucial factor in maintaining a low steady-state level of oxidative DNA damage and protecting us from cancer. Cancer case–control studies, using indirect assays in which chromosome breakage in lymphocytes is taken as a measure of failure to repair DNA, indicate an association between poor repair and cancer risk, but case–control studies can be misleading. Surprisingly little is known of the variations in repair capacity within healthy human populations. It is likely that differences in repair enzyme activity result from genetic polymorphisms in repair genes, which have been shown, in some cases, to be linked to cancer. There is a need for prospective studies, in which genotype is analysed (for a range of repair and related genes) and repair activity measured before cancer has developed. Using a new method to measure repair in an extract of lymphocytes, based on a modification of the comet assay, we are seeking answers to the following questions: what is the normal range of repair activities in healthy humans; do differences in repair capacity correlate with genetic variations; is low repair capacity associated with a high risk of cancer; how important is DNA repair rate in determining the steady-state level of damage; what is the extent of intra-individual variation; is repair modulated by environmental factors or induced by damage; are there differences in repair capacity between men and women; what is the association of DNA repair with ageing?
2 To whom correspondence should be addressed.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Bhatti, A. J. Sigurdson, C. B. Thomas, A. Iwan, B. H. Alexander, D. Kampa, L. Bowen, M. M. Doody, and I. M. Jones No Evidence for Differences in DNA Damage Assessed before and after a Cancer Diagnosis Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 990 - 994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Shen, M. Desai, M. Agrawal, D. O. Kennedy, R. T. Senie, R. M. Santella, and M. B. Terry Polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair genes and DNA repair capacity phenotype in sisters discordant for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2006; 15(9): 1614 - 1619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Kyoizumi, Y. Kusunoki, T. Hayashi, M. Hakoda, J. B. Cologne, and K. Nakachi Individual Variation of Somatic Gene Mutability in Relation to Cancer Susceptibility: Prospective Study on Erythrocyte Glycophorin A Gene Mutations of Atomic Bomb Survivors Cancer Res., June 15, 2005; 65(12): 5462 - 5469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Vodicka, R. Kumar, R. Stetina, S. Sanyal, P. Soucek, V. Haufroid, M. Dusinska, M. Kuricova, M. Zamecnikova, L. Musak, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and possible links with DNA repair rates, chromosomal aberrations and single-strand breaks in DNA Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2004; 25(5): 757 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Caporaso The Molecular Epidemiology of Oxidative Damage to DNA and Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, September 3, 2003; 95(17): 1263 - 1265. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|