Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamada, N.A.
Right arrow Articles by Farber, R.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamada, N.A.
Right arrow Articles by Farber, R.A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 18, No. 3, 277-282, May 2003
© 2003 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Variation in the extent of microsatellite instability in human cell lines with defects in different mismatch repair genes

N.A. Yamada1, A. Castro1 and R.A. Farber1,2,3,4

1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 2 Department of Genetics and 3 Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

Mismatch repair deficiency results in the elevation of mutation rates in tumors, which is especially pronounced in simple repeat sequences (microsatellites). We have investigated the relationship between microsatellite mutagenesis and certain combinations of mutations in mismatch repair genes, using a frameshift reversion assay to determine the spontaneous mutation rates of a dinucleotide microsatellite in two cancer cell lines, HCT116, which has defects in hMLH1 and hMSH3, and HEC-1-A, which has defects in hPMS2 and hMSH6. We found a 10-fold difference in mutation rates between these two cell lines. In addition, a mutant hPMS2 allele, PMS134, which has been reported to have a dominant negative effect, was expressed in mismatch repair-proficient telomerase-immortalized hTERT-1604 fibroblasts and mutation rates were determined. Expression of PMS134 did not elevate mutation rates in hTERT-1604. Combined, these results suggest that mutations in different mismatch repair genes can lead to varying degrees of microsatellite instability. It is also likely that there is heterogeneity in the mutations that are acquired in the absence of mismatch repair, such that some mismatch repair-defective cancer cells also contain mutations in other genes coding for proteins involved in the maintenance of genetic stability.

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB 7525 Brinkhous-Bullitt Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Tel: +1 919 966 6920; Fax: +1 919 843 4682; Email: rfarber{at}med.unc.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
J. Shia
Immunohistochemistry versus Microsatellite Instability Testing For Screening Colorectal Cancer Patients at Risk For Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Syndrome: Part I. The Utility of Immunohistochemistry
J. Mol. Diagn., July 1, 2008; 10(4): 293 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.