Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaulden, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaulden, M. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis vol. 2 no. 5 pp. 357-365, 1987
© 1987 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

other

Hypothesis: some mutagens directly alter specific chromosomal proteins (DNA topoisomerase II and peripheral proteins) to produce chromosome stickiness, which causes chromosome aberrations

Mary Esther Gaulden

Radiation Biology Section, Radiology Department, University of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75235, USA

Recent biochemical and molecular biological data on the composition and structure of the chromosome and the nucleus, combined with observations on the chromosomes of mutant yeast cells and grasshopper neuroblasts, offer new perspectives on mutagen-induced chromosome stickiness and its relation to chromosome breakage. A hypothesis consistent with these data states that chromosome stickiness (i) results from changes in specific non-histone proteins (topoisomerase II and the peripheral proteins) that are integral components of the chromosome and whose function is necessary for separation and segregation of chromatids, the changes being caused either by mutation in structural genes for the proteins (heritable stickiness) or by direct action of mutagens on the proteins (induced stickiness); (ii) occurs in various degrees (slight, moderate, severe, extreme) that are determined by the number of target protein molecules affected, a certain number (threshold) of affected molecules at a given site on a chromosome being required to resist the forces of anaphase movement in order to produce microscopically detectable stickiness; (iii) results from molecular events that can occur at several phases of the cell cycle (including interphase), but can only be recognized at prometaphase, metaphase and anaphase; and (iv) causes chromosome aberrations by the physical stretching and breaking of chromatids at the sticky sites; hence the breakage resulting from stickiness is a secondary effect that requires anaphase movement, in contrast to breakage resulting from direct action of mutagens on DNA.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 MutagenesisHome page
D. Kirkland, M Aardema, N Banduhn, P Carmichael, R Fautz, J-R Meunier, and S Pfuhler
In vitro approaches to develop weight of evidence (WoE) and mode of action (MoA) discussions with positive in vitro genotoxicity results
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2007; 22(3): 161 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.