Skip Navigation


Mutagenesis Advance Access originally published online on April 20, 2005
Mutagenesis 2005 20(3):153-163; doi:10.1093/mutage/gei031
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/153    most recent
gei031v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bilsland, E.
Right arrow Articles by Downs, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bilsland, E.
Right arrow Articles by Downs, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

REVIEW

Tails of histones in DNA double-strand break repair

Elizabeth Bilsland and Jessica A. Downs*

Department of Biochemistry, Cambridge University, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are, arguably, the most deleterious form of DNA damage. An increasing body of evidence points to the inaccurate or inefficient repair of DSBs as a key step in tumorigenesis. Therefore, it is of great importance to understand the processes by which DSBs are detected and repaired. Clearly, these events must take place in the context of chromatin in vivo, and recently, a great deal of progress has been made in understanding the dynamic and active role that histone proteins and chromatin modifying activities play in DNA DSB repair. Here, we briefly review some of the most common techniques in studying DNA DSB responses in vivo, and focus on the contributions of covalent modifications of core histone proteins to these DNA DSB responses.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +01223 333 663; Fax: +01223 766 002; Email: jad32{at}mole.bio.cam.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
R. G. Sturmey, J. A. Hawkhead, E. A. Barker, and H. J. Leese
DNA damage and metabolic activity in the preimplantation embryo
Hum. Reprod., October 3, 2008; (2008) den346v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Chakravarti, M. G. Erkkinen, U. Nestler, R. Stupp, M. Mehta, K. Aldape, M. R. Gilbert, P. McL. Black, and J. S. Loeffler
Temozolomide-Mediated Radiation Enhancement in Glioblastoma: A Report on Underlying Mechanisms
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2006; 12(15): 4738 - 4746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
A. M. Holmes, K. A. Weedmark, and G. B. Gloor
Mutations in the extra sex combs and Enhancer of Polycomb Genes Increase Homologous Recombination in Somatic Cells of Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, April 1, 2006; 172(4): 2367 - 2377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.