Skip Navigation


Mutagenesis Advance Access originally published online on May 17, 2005
Mutagenesis 2005 20(4):285-290; doi:10.1093/mutage/gei032
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/4/285    most recent
gei032v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siddique, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dhawan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siddique, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dhawan, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Validation of Drosophila melanogaster as an in vivo model for genotoxicity assessment using modified alkaline Comet assay

Hifzur R. Siddique, D.Kar Chowdhuri, D.K. Saxena and Alok Dhawan1,*

Embryotoxicology Section and 1Developmental Toxicology Section, Industrial Toxicology Research Center, PO Box 80, M.G. Marg, Lucknow, 226001, Uttar Pradesh, India

The single cell gel electrophoresis or Comet assay is one of the most popular techniques for genotoxicity assessment. The present study was undertaken to validate our previously modified version of the Comet assay for genotoxicity assessment in Drosophila melanogaster (Oregon R+) with four well-known mutagenic and carcinogenic alkylating agents, i.e. ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) and cyclophosphamide (CP). Third instar larvae (74 ± 2 h) of D.melanogaster were fed different concentrations of EMS, MMS, ENU and CP (0.05, 0.5 and 1.0 mM) mixed standard Drosophila food for 24 h. At 98 ± 2 h, the anterior midgut from control and treated larvae were dissected out, single-cell suspensions were prepared and Comet assay was performed. Our results show a dose-dependent increase in DNA damage with all the four alkylating agents, in comparison to control. The lower concentration (0.05 mM) of the test chemicals, except MMS, did not induce any DNA damage in the gut cells of the exposed larvae. When comparison of Comet parameters was made among the chemicals, MMS was found to be the most potent genotoxicant and ENU the least. The present study validated our previous observation and shows that D.melanogaster is a sensitive and suitable model for the in vivo assessment of genotoxicity using our modified alkaline Comet assay.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +91 522 2613786, ext: 320; Fax: +91 522 2628227; Email: dhawanalok{at}hotmail.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.