Skip Navigation


Mutagenesis Advance Access originally published online on December 6, 2006
Mutagenesis 2007 22(1):55-62; doi:10.1093/mutage/gel058
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/1/55    most recent
gel058v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Staal, Y. C.M.
Right arrow Articles by van Delft, J. H.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Staal, Y. C.M.
Right arrow Articles by van Delft, J. H.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Modulation of gene expression and DNA-adduct formation in precision-cut liver slices exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of different carcinogenic potency

Yvonne C.M. Staal1, Marcel H.M. van Herwijnen1, Daphnee S. Pushparajah2, Meera Umachandran2, Costas Ioannides2, Frederik J. van Schooten1 and Joost H.M. van Delft1,*

1 Department of Health Risk Analysis and Toxicology, Maastricht University PO Box 616 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands 2 Molecular Toxicology Group, School of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, University of Surrey Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) differ markedly in their carcinogenic potencies. Differences in transcriptomic responses upon PAH exposures might improve our current understanding of the differences in carcinogenicity, and therefore gene expression modulation by six PAHs in precision-cut rat liver slices was investigated. Gene expression modulation by benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), dibenzo[a,l]pyrene (DB[a,l]P), benzo[b]fluoranthene (B[b]F), fluoranthene (FA), dibenzo[a,h]anthracene (DB[a,h]A) and 1-methylphenanthrene (1-MPA) was assessed after 6- (B[a]P, DB[a,l]P) and 24-h (all compounds) exposure, using oligonucleotide arrays. DNA-adduct formation was determined using 32P-post-labelling. The effects of PAHs on gene expression and on DNA-adduct formation were much more pronounced after 24-h exposure than after a 6-h exposure. Each compound induced gene expression changes dose-dependently and gene expression profiles were generally compound-specific. B[a]P, B[b]F and DB[a,h]A displayed comparable gene expression profiles, and so did DB[a,l]P, FA and 1-MPA. Only the carcinogenic PAHs (B[a]P, B[b]F, DB[a,l]P and DB[a,h]A) induced the oxidative stress pathway. DNA-adduct levels were: DB[a,l]P >> B[a]P > B[b]F ≥ DB[a,h]A > FA ≥ 1-MPA. The expression of only a few genes was found to correlate significantly with DNA-adduct formation, carcinogenic potency or Ah-receptor binding capacity (the last two taken from literature). These genes differed between the parameters. Our results indicate that PAHs generally induce a compound-specific response on gene expression and that discrimination of carcinogenic from non-carcinogenic compounds is partly feasible using this approach. Only at a specific pathway level, namely oxidative stress response, PAHs with high and low carcinogenic potency could be discriminated.

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +31 43 3881092; Fax: +31 43 3884146; Email: j.vandelft{at}grat.unimaas.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
Y. C. M. Staal, D. S. Pushparajah, M. H. M. van Herwijnen, R. W. H. Gottschalk, L. M. Maas, C. Ioannides, F. J. van Schooten, and J. H. M. van Delft
Interactions between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in binary mixtures: Effects on gene expression and DNA adduct formation in precision-cut rat liver slices
Mutagenesis, November 1, 2008; 23(6): 491 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
D. S. Pushparajah, M. Umachandran, K. E. Plant, N. Plant, and C. Ioannides
Up-regulation of the glutathione S-transferase system in human liver by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; comparison with rat liver and lung
Mutagenesis, July 1, 2008; 23(4): 299 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. N. McDougal and C. M. Garrett
Gene Expression and Target Tissue Dose in the Rat Epidermis after Brief JP-8 and JP-8 Aromatic and Aliphatic Component Exposures
Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2007; 97(2): 569 - 581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.