Skip Navigation


Mutagenesis Advance Access originally published online on February 6, 2007
Mutagenesis 2007 22(2):129-134; doi:10.1093/mutage/gel066
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/2/129    most recent
gel066v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cammerer, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Suter, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cammerer, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Suter, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Comparison of the peripheral blood micronucleus test using flow cytometry in rat and mouse exposed to aneugens after single-dose applications

Zoryana Cammerer*, Azeddine Elhajouji, Micheline Kirsch-Volders1 and Willi Suter

Safety Profiling and Assessment, Exploratory Development, Novartis Pharma AG, MUT-2881.5.44, CH4002 Basel, Switzerland 1Laboratory of Cell Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

Detection of clastogenic compounds in the peripheral blood micronucleus test (MNT) in rats is a well-established methodology. However, the results obtained on the induction of micronuclei by aneugens in rat peripheral blood are controversial. Our aim was a comparative evaluation of the peripheral blood flow cytometry MNT in Wistar Han rat and CD1 mouse exposed to three aneugens (vinblastine, vincristine and colchicine) after single-dose applications. In addition, the same compounds were tested in the rat bone marrow MNT. The treatment with vinblastine (0.25, 0.5, 1, mg/kg), vincristine (0.025, 0.05, 0.1 mg/kg) or colchicine (0.7, 1, 1.3 mg/kg) induced no statistically significant increase in MN-PCEs (micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes or reticulocytes) in rat peripheral blood. In rat bone marrow, a clear statistically significant increase in MN-PCE was found with vincristine and vinblastine. However, colchicine showed a clear increase in MN-PCE frequency without reaching statistically significant level only at 1 mg/kg. The positive effect in the bone marrow MNT shows that the target organ was exposed to the appropriate concentration levels of the respective aneugens. In mouse, the peripheral blood flow cytometry analysis after the treatment with vinblastine, vincristine and colchicine showed clear statistically significant increase in MN-PCE with all three compounds. The experiments with splenectomized rats treated with vincristine and colchicine were performed and statistically significant increases in MN-PCE were found with 0.05, 0.1, 0.15 mg/kg of vincristine and 0.7 and 1 mg/kg of colchicine. Our results demonstrate that micronucleated cells induced by aneugens are removed from rat peripheral blood by the spleen due to the large size of micronuclei. Based on our data, it is concluded that the flow cytometry peripheral blood MNT after single-dose applications is an appropriate test system for evaluating the genotoxic effects of aneugens in mice. However, in rats peripheral blood MNT aneugen detection might require multiple-dose applications to overwhelm the spleen effect.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +41 61 3241459; Fax: +41 61 3241274; Email: zoryana.cammerer{at}novartis.com

Received on July 20, 2006; revised on November 15, 2006; accepted on November 17, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.