Skip Navigation



Mutagenesis Advance Access published online on November 1, 2009

Mutagenesis, doi:10.1093/mutage/gep042
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donner, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Preston, R. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donner, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Preston, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Reciprocal translocations in somatic and germ cells of mice chronically exposed by inhalation to ethylene oxide: implications for risk assessment

E. Maria Donner1,*, Brian A. Wong, R. Arden James and R. Julian Preston2

The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, 6 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA 1Present addresses: DuPont Haskell Global Centers for Health and Environmental Sciences, SHRC S320, 1090 Elkton Road, Newark, DE 19711, USA 2Present addresses: National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (MD B105-01), US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA

Groups of male B6C3F1 mice were exposed by inhalation to 0, 25, 50, 100 or 200 p.p.m. ethylene oxide (EO) for up to 48 weeks (6 hours/day, 5 days/week). Animals were sacrificed at 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks after the start of the exposure for analyses of reciprocal translocations in peripheral blood lymphocytes and germ cells. The frequency of the total chromosomal aberrations in the peripheral blood lymphocytes was significantly increased at the 100 and 200 p.p.m. exposure concentrations at the 12-week time point, at 50, 100 and 200 p.p.m. at the 24-week time point and at all EO concentrations at the 48-week time point. The frequency of stable reciprocal translocations, which can be used as biomarkers, was increased (P < 0.05) at 100 and 200 p.p.m. at the 12-week time point, at 100 and 200 p.p.m. at the 24-week time point and at 50, 100 and 200 p.p.m. at the 48-week time point. No statistically significant increase could be observed in translocation frequencies at the 6-week time point in the peripheral blood lymphocytes. The exposure–response curves were non-linear when the frequencies of translocations were plotted against EO exposure durations or against EO exposure concentrations. There was no effect of exposure concentration rate on reciprocal translocation frequency. Reciprocal translocations induced in spermatogonial stem cells (observed at the sprematocyte stage) showed significant increases in translocation frequencies over controls at all EO concentrations at 48 weeks. However, increases were small and they did not occur in a dose-responsive manner. The statistically significant increase observed at 12 weeks in the spermatocytes was equivocal. This study provides low-level chronic exposure somatic cytogenetic data generated in mice that can be used to support the shape of the tumour dose–response in rodents and humans The germ cell cytogenetic data are discussed in terms of its relevance for a threshold response for genetic effects at low exposures.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 302 366 5251; Fax: +1 302 338 8833; Email: maria.donner{at}usa.dupont.com

Received on June 11, 2009; revised on September 6, 2009; accepted on September 23, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.