Skip Navigation



Mutagenesis Advance Access published online on November 5, 2009

Mutagenesis, doi:10.1093/mutage/gep050
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhong, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lu, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhong, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lu, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Effects of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) polymorphisms on cancer: a meta-analysis

Yu Zhong, Yongsheng Huang, Yan Huang, Tianbao Zhang1, Chengying Ma2, Shuyong Zhang2, Weiwei Fan, Hongyan Chen, Ji Qian and Daru Lu*

State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and the MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, Institute of Genetics, School of Life Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, People's Republic of China 1Department of Health Toxicology, Shanghai Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, People's Republic of China 2Life Science Institute, Nanchang University, Jiangxi Province 330031, People's Republic of China

O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase is one of the rare proteins to directly remove alkylating agents in the human DNA direct reversal repair pathway. Its two common single-nucleotide polymorphisms, Leu84Phe and Ile143Val, had previously been identified to contribute to susceptibility of cancer. However, there are conflicting results in studies on the association of the two polymorphisms with cancer. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to clarify the paradox with a large collected sample (13 069 cancer patients and 20 290 controls). We found significant association between the T allele (84Phe) and cancer risk, under the recessive genetic model [P = 0.023, odds ratio (OR) = 1.251, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.031–1.517, Pheterogeneity = 0.270], TT versus CC comparison (P = 0.035, OR = 1.239, 95% CI 1.015–1.511, Pheterogeneity = 0.225) and TT versus CT comparison (P = 0.007, OR = 1.292, 95% CI 1.071–1.559, Pheterogeneity = 0.374), using the random-effect model. In the ethnicity subgroup analysis, a significant association with cancer among Caucasians was found under the recessive genetic model, homozygote comparison and TT versus TC comparison. In the tumour sites subgroup analysis, only the protective effects of Leu84Phe polymorphism were found in colorectal cancer, under CT versus CC comparison. No significant association between the G allele of Ile143Val and cancer risk was found. The G allele showed an increased lung cancer risk under the dominant genetic model and AG versus AA comparison in all Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium subjects, only when the fixed-effect model was used. However, it was insignificant in the random-effect model.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +86 21 65642799; Fax: +86 21 65642799; Email: drlu{at}fudan.edu.cn

Received on April 26, 2009; revised on September 16, 2009; accepted on October 10, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.