Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minissi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rizzoni, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minissi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rizzoni, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 14, No. 1, 43-49, January 1999
© 1999 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Effect of cytochalasin B on the induction of chromosome missegregation by colchicine at low concentrations in human lymphocytes

Sandra Minissi1,4, Bianca Gustavino1, Francesca Degrassi2, Caterina Tanzarella3 and Marco Rizzoni1

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +39 6 72594812; Fax: +39 6 2023500; Email: minissi{at}bio.uniroma2.it 1 Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Roma `Tor Vergata', Viale della Ricerca Scientifica, 00133 Roma, 2 Centro di Genetica Evoluzionistica del CNR, Roma and 3 Dipartimento di Biologia, Università `Roma Tre', Viale Guglielmo Marconi 446, 00146 Roma, Italy


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion and conclusions
 References
 
The aim of the present work was to investigate the possible interference of cytochalasin B (cyt B) with low concentration treatment with colchicine in the induction of chromosome/chromatid loss and micronuclei in human lymphocytes mitotically activated in vitro. Thus, cells from a single female donor were treated with colchicine (10 or 25 nM, from 24 h after PHA addition to fixation at 66 h) either in the presence or absence of cyt B. Single lagging chromosomes/chromatids were scored in bipolar ana-telophases and greater damage (disrupted and c-anaphases) was scored in cells at anaphase. Micronuclei were scored in the first 4000 nuclei observed in both cyt B-treated (in mononucleate and binucleate cells) and untreated cultures. With the same criterion, FISH analysis was performed on 2000 nuclei where chromosome 7 and 11 centromeric DNA probes were used in pairs. Our results showed that: (i) the frequency of laggards and of micronuclei increased with colchicine concentration but in the presence of cyt B there was a lower frequency of both (with a mean reduction of ~49%); (ii) FISH analysis showed a colchicine concentration-dependent increase in nuclei with three spots for chromosome 7; (iii) a colchicine concentration-dependent increase in tetraploid cells was observed. This increase was particularly remarkable (5-fold) in cells grown in the presence of cyt B compared with cyt B-untreated cells. The observed `cyt B effects' can be explained if it is assumed that in cytokinesis-blocked cells there is a shorter distance between the poles. As a consequence: (i) laggards would be engulfed in the nearest daughter nucleus with a consequent lower induction of micronuclei; (ii) segregating sister chromatids in heavily impaired anaphases would not travel a sufficient distance to give rise to two daughter nuclei, leading to an increased frequency of polyploid nuclei.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion and conclusions
 References
 
Cytochalasin B (cyt B) is a chemical agent which inhibits cytoplasmic cleavage (cytokinesis) without preventing nuclear division (karyokinesis) (Carter, 1967Go). As a consequence, cells that have divided once in the presence of cyt B can be easily identified by the presence of two nuclei. It is noteworthy that, under this condition, all the products of a mitosis are included in the same cell.

In recent years, the cytokinesis-block (CB) method, introduced by Fenech and Morley (1985), has been widely used in the human lymphocyte micronucleus assay because it allows restriction of the analysis to cells that have undergone one mitotic division. Furthermore, the fluorescence in situ hybridization technique (FISH) with chromosome-specific centromeric DNA probes (Eastmond and Pinkel, 1990Go) on binucleate cells has been shown to be a useful approach for studying chromosome missegregation (loss and non-disjunction), allowing recognition of micronuclei (MN) containing whole chromosomes or identification of co-migration of sister chromatids in the daughter nucleus (Zijno et al., 1994Go; Marshall et al., 1996Go).

Based on the use of the CB method, recent work suggested that in human lymphocytes treated with low concentrations of spindle poisons, non-disjunction is induced more frequently than loss events (MN) (Marshall et al., 1996Go; Minissi et al., 1996Go; Zijno et al., 1996aGo; Sgura et al., 1997Go).

A prerequisite for such a conclusion is that cyt B treatment does not interfere with the induction of chromosome missegregation or, at least, the degree of interference should be known. Earlier studies provided contradictory results on this issue. According to these investigations, cyt B does not interfere with MN induction (Fenech and Morley, 1985Go; Prosser et al., 1988Go), but rather reduces MN induction in combined treatments with colchicine (Antoccia et al., 1993Go) or changes the balance between MN containing chromosome fragments and whole chromosomes (Norppa et al., 1993Go; Surrallés et al., 1996Go; Falck et al., 1997Go).

The aim of the present work was to investigate the possible interference of cyt B with the induction of chromosome/chromatid loss and MN by colchicine (10 and 25 nM) in cultured human lymphocytes in vitro. Such colchicine concentrations were chosen because single chromosome misdistributions are induced and the c-mitotic effect does not prevail (Gustavino et al., 1994Go). For our purposes, ana-telophases of cells grown in the presence or absence of cyt B were analysed for lagging chromosomes and chromatids, which are the events leading to formation of MN. To obtain a more general picture of the interference of cyt B with colchicine-induced spindle damage, the ratio between disrupted anaphases (in which two scattered groups of chromatids directed towards the two poles can be distinguished) and c-anaphases (in which only one group of chromatids can be distinguished) was investigated. Moreover, the MN frequency per nucleus and the distribution of hybridization centromeric signals (chromosomes 7 and 11) per nucleus were investigated in interphase cells grown in the presence or absence of cyt B. For this purpose, scoring was performed on randomly chosen activated interphase nuclei (morphologically recognizable), regardless of whether they were in mononucleate or binucleate cells. This scoring criterion was chosen because in cyt B-untreated culture it is impossible to distinguish interphase nuclei belonging to cells that have undergone mitotic division, which are comparable with binucleate cells. Using this approach, it became possible to compare randomized populations of activated nuclei belonging to cells that had divided or not. To verify the possible interference of cyt B with progression of the cell cycle, 5-BrUdR was supplied and the frequency of M1, M2 and M3+ metaphases was evaluated.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion and conclusions
 References
 
Cell culture, chemical treatment and cell fixation
Lymphocyte cultures were established with blood collected from a female donor aged 35. For each culture, 0.5 ml of whole blood was added to 4.5 ml of RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma) supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Hyclone), 2% phytohaemagglutinin (Murex), 1% L-glutamine (Gibco), antibiotics (100 IU/ml penicillin and 0.1 mg/ml streptomicin) (Gibco) and 30 µM 5-BrUdR and incubated at 37°C.

Colchicine (10 or 25 nM) was added to the cultures 24 h after PHA addition and was present until fixation. In order to obtain cytokinesis-blocked cells, 44 h after PHA stimulation cytochalasin B (Sigma) dissolved in DMSO was added to a final concentration of 6 µg /ml. Three cultures were made in parallel for each concentration.

Both cyt B-treated and untreated cells were harvested 66 h after PHA stimulation. Lymphocytes were pelleted by centrifugation. After a mild hypotonic treatment (75 mM KCl for 2 min at room temperature) to preserve the cytoplasm, cells were gently fixed four times with methanol:acetic acid (3:1 for cyt B-untreated cultures and 5:1 in the case of cyt-B treated cultures). Fixed cells were stored at –20°C.

Giemsa stained slides
Slides for the analysis of anaphases and MN were stained with Giemsa (3% for 5–8 min). For each experimental point, the degree of spindle damage was studied scoring 100–200 anaphases for the frequency of normal bipolar, disrupted and c-anaphases; at least 100 bipolar ana-telophases were analysed for single lagging chromosomes and chromatids.

One hundred randomly chosen, activated cells in interphase were preliminarly scored for each point to estimate the frequencies of binucleate and multinucleate cells.

Micronucleus frequency was investigated, at each concentration, in the first encountered 4000, randomly chosen, activated interphase nuclei (morphologically recognizable) in both cyt B-treated (where nuclei were scored regardless of whether they belonged to mononucleate or binucleate cells) and cyt B-untreated cultures. MN were identified following the standard criteria (Heddle et al., 1983Go). As recommended by different authors, cyt B-induced multinucleate cells were not scored because they show a high micronucleus frequency and derive from multipolar divisions which frequently show aberrations in anaphase of cells that have divided more than once in the presence of cyt B (Lindholm et al., 1991Go; Norppa et al., 1993Go).

Slides were coded and scored blind by two scorers. Each scorer analysed half of the scored cells.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
FISH was performed using commercial centromeric DNA probes (Oncor) specific for the alphoid sequences of chromosome 7 (biotin-conjugated probe) and chromosome 11 (digoxigenin-conjugated probe). Chromosomes 7 and 11 were probed in pairs using FITC and rhodamine as fluorescent labels. Slides were pretreated with pepsin (Sigma) (50 µg/ml in 0.01 N HCl, 5 min at 37°C), dehydrated (3 min in cold 70, 90 and 100% ethanol) and denatured (70% formamide, 2x SSC, 2 min, at 70°C). The probes were denatured at 70°C for 5 min. Hybridization was performed overnight at 37°C in a moist chamber. The slides were washed in 50% formamide, 2x SSC at 42°C and then in 0.1x SSC at 60°C. The detection of chromosome 7 biotin-labelled probe was carried out with FITC–avidin (Oncor) and the fluorescence intensity was amplified using biotinylated anti-avidin antibody (Oncor), followed by an additional layer of FITC–avidin. The chromosome 11 digoxigenin-labelled probe was immunodetected using a mouse anti-digoxigenin antibody (Boehringer Mannheim) followed by an anti-mouse–digoxigenin antibody (Boehringer Mannheim) and anti-digoxigenin–rhodamine antibody (Boehringer Mannheim). After immunodetection slides were counterstained with DAPI (Sigma) and mounted in Vectashield (Vector laboratories).

The slides were examined with a Zeiss Axiophot microscope fitted with a FITC/rhodamine double bandpass filter set and a DAPI single bandpass filter set.

For the reasons explained above, analysis was restricted to monucleate and binucleate cells. For each experimental point, the first encountered 2000, randomly chosen nuclei were scored regardless of whether they belonged to mononucleate or binucleate cells (in cyt B-treated cultures). All nuclei with any number of hybridization signals were recorded. The frequencies of nuclei with three and four spots for one probed chromosome were estimated on all the four classes of nuclei which were found (1, 2, 3 and 4 spots). Nuclei with three hybridization signals for one chromosome always had two signals for the other. Nuclei with four hybridization signals for one chromosome always had four signals for the other, therefore they were classified as tetraploid nuclei. All the observed tetraploid nuclei were found in mononucleate cells, both in cyt B-treated and untreated cultures. Nuclei with one spot for one probed chromosome were considered mostly as artifacts due to signal overlap or poor probe penetration; their frequency ranged between 1 and 5%.

Slides were coded and scored blind by two scorers. Each scorer analysed half of the cells.

Differentially stained slides
For each experimental point, one slide was stained by the Hoechst + Giemsa technique (Perry and Wolff, 1974Go) and a sample of 100 metaphases was analysed for the frequency of M1, M2 and M3+ metaphases. Tetraploid metaphases were all M2 and they were counted as two cells, being the result of a lack of segregation of the two daughter cells following anaphase failure (colchicine) or cytokinesis failure (cyt B).

Slides were coded and scored blind by two scorers. Each scorer analysed half of the scored cells.

Statistical analysis
To compare colchicine-induced effects (chromosome/chromatid loss, MN, disrupted and c-anaphases, three spot interphase nuclei, tetraploid nuclei) between cyt B-treated and untreated cell cultures, a {chi}2 test was performed. Data for statistical analysis were obtained by subtracting the respective control level from the two concentrations of colchicine and pooling the resulting data. No significant difference was observed for the above-mentioned effects in colchicine-untreated cell cultures between cyt B-treated and untreated cultures.

To compare the possible interference of cyt B with cell cycle progression for both colchicine concentrations and for colchicine-untreated cultures, {chi}2 tests were performed between cultures grown in the presence and in the absence of cyt B at each colchicine concentration for the frequency of M1, M2 and M3+ cells.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion and conclusions
 References
 
Binucleate cells in cyt B-treated cell cultures were 40, 40 and 35% of activated cells in cultures treated with 0, 10 and 25 nM colchicine, respectively; multinucleate interphase cells were 2, 2 and 3% of activated cells in cultures treated with 0, 10 and 25 nM colchicine, respectively; neither binucleate nor multinucleate cells were found in cyt B-untreated cultures.

The frequency of laggards in bipolar ana-telophases (Figure 1Go) and of MN at interphase (Figure 2Go) increased with colchicine concentration but in the presence of cyt B there was a lower induction of both events. Such an effect of cyt B was undetected in colchicine-untreated cultures. In colchicine-treated cultures, the mean reduction in the induction of laggards and of micronuclei was ~49% in the presence of cyt B, compared with the corresponding frequencies observed in cyt B-untreated cultures. Figure 3Go shows examples of a normal anaphase (a) and of a lagging chromatid at anaphase (b) in human lymphocytes.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Frequency (%) of single lagging chromosomes and chromatids in bipolar ana-telophases of human lymphocytes treated in vitro with low concentrations of colchicine in the presence or absence of cyt B. The number of ana-telophases scored is shown in parenthesis below each column. The difference in the frequency of colchicine-induced laggards between cells treated and untreated with cyt B is significant at 0.05 ({chi}2 = 4.03). Data for statistical analysis were obtained by subtracting the respective control level from the two concentrations of colchicine and pooling the resulting data.

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. MN frequency at interphase in human lymphocytes treated in vitro with low concentrations of colchicine in the presence and absence of cyt B. The frequency is expressed per 1000 nuclei. At each concentration 4000 nuclei were scored. In cultures containing cyt B no distinction was made between mononucleate and binucleate cells. The difference in the frequency of colchicine-induced MN between cells treated and untreated with cyt B is significant at 0.01 ({chi}2 = 6.77). Data for statistical analysis were obtained by subtracting the respective control level from the two concentrations of colchicine and pooling the resulting data.

 


View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Human lymphocytes treated in vitro with low concentrations of colchicine (10 and 25 nM). (a) A normal anaphase; (b) a lagging chromatid in a slightly disrupted anaphase (black arrow); (c) a disrupted anaphase; (d) a c-anaphase. Bars represent 10 µm.

 
Both in the presence and in the absence of cyt B, FISH analysis showed a concentration-dependent increase in the frequency of nuclei with three hybridization signals for chromosome 7 (Figure 4Go). Such an increase was not observed for chromosome 11. The reason for this apparent difference is not understood at present and more studies are needed to verify it. A photograph of a human lymphocyte with three spots for chromosome 7 is shown in Figure 5Go. No significant difference was found for the frequencies of three spot nuclei between cyt B-treated and untreated cultures for chromosome 7.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Frequency of interphase nuclei with three hybridization signals for either chromosome 7 or 11 in human lymphocytes treated in vitro with low concentrations of colchicine in the presence and absence of cyt B. Frequency is expressed per 1000 nuclei. For each concentration 2000 nuclei were scored. In cultures containing cyt B no distinction was made between mononucleate and binucleate cells. The difference in the frequencies of nuclei with three hybridization signals for chromosome 7 between cells treated and untreated with cyt B is not significant ({chi}2 = 1.00, P > 0.25). The difference in the sum of frequencies of nuclei with three hybridization signals for either chromosome 7 or 11 between cells treated and untreated with cyt B is not significant ({chi}2 = 1.06, P > 0.25). Data for statistical analysis were obtained by subtracting the respective control level from the two concentrations of colchicine and pooling the resulting data.

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Labelling of chromosome 7 (green) and 11 (red) centromeres by in situ hybridization in human lymphocytes treated in vitro with low concentrations of colchicine. (a) A cell with three hybridization signals for chromosome 7; (b) a tetraploid cell, with four hybridization signals for both chromosomes 7 and 11. Bars represent 10 µm.

 
By FISH analysis, a colchicine concentration-dependent increase in tetraploid nuclei (four well-separated signals for both chromosomes in the same nucleus; see Figure 5Go) was observed (Figure 6Go). Such an increase was particularly remarkable in cells grown in the presence of cyt B, where it was 5-fold higher than the corresponding frequency in cyt B-untreated cultures.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The frequency of interphase nuclei with four hybridization signals for both chromosomes 7 and 11 in human lymphocytes treated in vitro with low concentrations of colchicine in the presence and absence of cyt B. Frequency is expressed per 1000 nuclei. At each concentration 2000 nuclei were scored; in cyt B-treated cultures nuclei were scored regardless of whether they belonged to mononucleate or binucleate cells. All scored tetraploid nuclei belonged to mononucleate cells. The difference in the frequency of colchicine-induced tetraploid cells between cultures treated and untreated with cyt B is significant at 0.001 ({chi}2 = 50.14). Data for statistical analysis were obtained by subtracting the respective control level from the two concentrations of colchicine and pooling the resulting data.

 
An increase in the frequency of induced heavy damage at anaphase (disrupted and c-anaphases) with increasing concentration of spindle poison was observed (Figure 7Go). Both in the presence and in the absence of cyt B a frequency of ~50% damaged anaphases was recorded at 10 nM and of ~86% at 25 nM colchicine. However, in the presence of cyt B the frequency of disrupted anaphases was about half of the corresponding value observed in the absence of cyt B, while the frequency of c-anaphases was remarkably higher. Thus, in the presence of cyt B and colchicine treatment, the most frequently induced damage is a lack of sister chromatid segregation, with a frequency of 69% of c-anaphases at the highest colchicine concentration. Figure 2Go shows examples of a disrupted (c) and a c-anaphase (d).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Frequency (%) of disrupted and c-anaphases scored in human lymphocytes treated in vitro with low concentrations of colchicine in the presence and absence of cyt B. 100 anaphases were scored with cyt B and 200 anaphases without cyt B. The difference in the frequency of colchicine-induced disrupted anaphases and c-anaphases between cultures treated and untreated with cyt B is significant at 0.005 ({chi}2 = 21.4 and 13.86, respectively). Data for statistical analysis were obtained by subtracting the respective control level from the two concentrations of colchicine and pooling the resulting data.

 
No significant difference was found in the frequency of M1, M2 and M3+ cells between cell cultures grown in the presence and absence of cyt B in colchicine-treated (10 and 25 nM) and untreated lymphocytes (Table IGo). This result suggests that, independently of the colchicine treatment, the addition of 6 µg /ml cyt B to the cultures does not induce any cell cycle delay up to the fixation time. M2 tetraploid metaphases were found only in cyt B-treated cultures.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Analysis of FPG stained metaphases of cells treated with colchicine in the presence (+) and absence (–) of cytochalasin B (cyt B)
 

    Discussion and conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion and conclusions
 References
 
The lack of interference of cyt B with cell cycle progression (Table IGo) allows one to exclude that this is the way by which cyt B reduces the frequency of MN induced by spindle poisons.

Following our data, in mitotically activated human lymphocytes treated with low concentrations of colchicine the observed induction of MN in cyt B-treated cultures is ~49% lower than that recorded in cyt B-untreated cultures. On the basis of our estimations (computation not shown), the underevaluation of MN frequency due to the omission of scoring of multinucleate cells in cyt B-treated cultures is negligible; thus, considering such underevaluation, an estimation of the reduction in MN frequency due to the interference of cyt B is ~42%. The present data should be confirmed in replicate experiments on lymphocytes from different subjects, including male subjects.

Our results suggest that cyt B treatment interferes with chromosome missegregation in human lymphocytes treated in vitro with spindle poison (as first suggested by Eastmond and Tucker, 1989Go; Migliore et al., 1989Go). The observed `cyt B effects' are likely to be explained if it is assumed that in cytokinesis-blocked cells the absence of the actin ring interferes with anaphase-B, leading to a shorter distance between the poles, as suggested by Norppa et al. (1993), Surrallés et al. (1996) and Falck et al. (1997) and measured by Cimini et al. (1997) in human fibroblasts. In Figure 8Go the process and the consequences of a shorter pole distance on daughter nuclei are described.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Interference of cyt B with chromosome content in daughter cells following colchicine-induced mitotic damage. In cytokinesis-blocked cells a shorter distance between the poles is hypothesized. Following this hypothesis, laggards are engulfed in the nearest daughter nucleus with a consequent lower induction of micronuclei (A' and A") and segregating sister chromatids in heavily impaired anaphases do not travel a sufficient distance to give place to two daughter nuclei, leading to polyploid restitution nuclei (B). The fate of a lagging chromatid (A'), of a lagging chromosome (A") and of a heavily impaired anaphase (B) are shown. Black bent arrows show engulfment of a chromatid/chromosome by the main nucleus. Column 1, misdistribution events; column 2, fate of misdistributed chromosomes/chromatids at telophase in the presence and absence of cyt B; column 3, karyotype composition of interphase daughter nuclei.

 
According to this hypothesis laggards would be engulfed in the nearest daughter nucleus, with a consequent lower micronucleus yield and an underestimation of the frequency of loss events in balance with non-disjunction (Figure 8AGo' and A''). A similar phenomenon could be hypothesized to explain the lower frequency of MN containing whole autosomes (Surrallés et al., 1996Go) and acentric fragments (Falck et al., 1997Go) in binucleate human lymphocytes.

On the basis of our estimations, starting from data on laggard and MN frequency (see Appendix 1), a very small increase in three spot cell frequency, due to the engulfment of laggards into daughter nuclei, is to be expected. This explains our results on three spot cells.

Another consequence of this hypothesis is that segregating sister chromatids in heavily impaired anaphases would not travel a sufficient distance to give rise to two daughter nuclei. This may explain the transformation of disrupted anaphases into c-anaphases and, consequently, the increased frequency of polyploid nuclei we observed (Figure 8BGo). An increased frequency of tetraploid cells was observed by Zijno et al. (1996b) in human lymphocytes treated with another spindle poison, vinblastin, in the presence of cyt B. The authors proposed a similar model to explain such an effect: the lack of a cleavage furrow could favour accidental nuclear fusion after a badly damaged mitosis.

Appendix 1. Calculation of the expected increase in the frequency of nuclei with three hybridization signals due to engulfment of lagging chromatids/chromosomes in cyt B-treated cultures
The expected relative frequency of nuclei with three hybridization signals due to engulfment of lagging chromatids/chromosomes in binucleate cells after cyt B treatment can be easily calculated on the basis of the hypothesis delineated in Figure 8AGo' and A". The equation is derived by multiplying the probabilities of single events leading to the class of cell of interest and by adding together the different probabilities of pathways leading to it. The following assumptions were made:

    (i) all chromosomes act similarly, i.e. they have the same probability, among them, to be lost or engulfed;

    (ii) the decrease in the frequency of laggards is due to engulfment.

The following symbols are used in the equation:

cmsl, probability of chromosome loss, measured as the relative frequency of ana-telophase with a single lagging chromosome among all scored bipolar ana-telophases;

ctdl, probability of chromatid loss, measured as the relative frequency of ana-telophase with a single lagging chromatid among all scored bipolar ana-telophases;

eng, probability of a laggard being regained by a main nucleus through engulfment;

i, expected increase in the frequency of cells with three hybridization signals for one probed chromosome.

Thus, the following equation can be written for binucleate cells


The expected increases in the frequency of cells with three hybridization signals for one probed chromosome were calculated giving the following values to the variables of the equation, on the basis of the empirical data (Figure 1Go).

  • Control culture: cmsl = 0%, ctdl = 0.35%;
  • 10 nM colchicine concentration: cmsl = 1.48%, ctdl = 1.48%;
  • 25 nM colchicine concentration: cmsl = 2.27%, ctdl = 2.59%.

Actually, with the present data, with eng = 0.42, the expected increase in trisomic nuclei for one probed chromosome is, on average, 0.2/1000 at 10 nM colchicine and 0.3/1000 at 25 nM. These values, which correspond to ~5% of the observed frequency of nuclei with three hybridization signals for one probed chromosome, are too low to be significantly detected.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion and conclusions
 References
 

    Antoccia,A., Tanzarella,C., Modesti,D. and Degrassi,F. (1993) Cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay with kinetochore detection in colchicine-treated human fibroblasts. Mutat. Res., 287, 93–99.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Carter,S.B. (1967) Effects of cytochalasins on mammalian cells. Nature, 21, 261–264.

    Cimini,D., Tanzarella,C. and Degrassi F. (1997) Evaluation of chromosome malsegregation in anaphase and binucleated cells. In Proceedings of the AGI-SIMA 1st Joint Meeting, Orvieto (Italy), 23–26 September 1977.

    Eastmond,D.A. and Pinkel,D. (1990) Detection of aneuploidy and aneuploidy-inducing agents in human lymphocyte using fluorescence in situ hybridization with chromosome-specific DNA probes. Mutat. Res., 234, 303–318.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Eastmond,D.A. and Tucker J.D. (1989) Identification of aneuploidy-inducing agents using cytokinesis-blocked human lymphocytes and an anti-kinetochore antibody. Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 13, 34–43.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Falck,G., Catalàn,J. and Norppa,H. (1997) Influence of culture time on the frequency and contents of human lymphocytes micronuclei with and without cytochalasin B. Mutat. Res., 392, 71–79.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Fenech,M. and Morley,A.A. (1985) Measurement of micronuclei in lymphocytes. Mutat. Res., 147, 29–36.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Gustavino,B., Degrassi,F., Filipponi,R., Modesti,D., Tanzarella,C. and Rizzoni,M. (1994) Mitotic non-disjunction in phytohemagglutinin stimulated human lymphocytes. Mutagenesis, 9, 17–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Heddle,J.A., Hite,M., Kirkhart,B., Mavournin,K., MacGregor,J.T., Newell,G.W. and Salamone,M.F. (1983) The induction of micronuclei as a measure of genotoxicity. Mutat. Res., 123, 61–118.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Lindholm,C., Norppa,H., Hayashi,M. and Sorsa,M. (1991) Induction of micronuclei and anaphase aberrations by cytochalasin B in human lymphocyte cultures. Mutat. Res., 260, 369–375.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Marshall,R.R., Murphy,M., Kirkland,D.J. and Bentley,K.S. (1996) Fluorescence in situ hybridisation with chromosome-specific centromeric probes: a sensitive method to detect aneuploidy. Mutat. Res., 372, 233–245.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Migliore,L., Nieri,M., Amodio,S., Loprieno N. (1989) The human lymphocytes micronucleus assay: a comparison between whole-blood and separated-lymphocytes culture. Mutat. Res., 227, 167–172.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Minissi,S., Degrassi,F., Tanzarella C., Gustavino,B. (1996) Micronucleus induction and origin of trisomy in human lymphocytes as detected by centromeric FISH analysis on binucleate cells and chromosome counting in M2 metaphases. Atti Ass. Genet. Ital. Vol. XLII, Riccione (RN), 2–5 October.

    Norppa,H., Renzi,L. and Lindholm,C. (1993) Detection of whole chromosomes in micronuclei of cytokinesis-blocked human lymphocytes by antikinetochore staining and in situ hybridisation. Mutagenesis, 8, 519–525.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Perry,P. and Wolff,S. (1974) New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids. Nature, 251, 156–158.[Medline]

    Prosser,J.S., Moquet,J.E., Lloyd,D.C. and Edwards,A.A. (1988) Radiation induction of micronuclei in human lymphocytes. Mutat. Res., 199, 37–45.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Sgura,A., Antoccia,A., Ramirez.,M.J., Marcos,R., Tanzarella,C., Degrassi F. (1997) Micronuclei, centromere-positive micronuclei and chromosome nondjunction in cytokinesis blocked human lymphocytes following mitomycin C and vincristine treatment. Mutat. Res., 392, 97–107.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Surrallés,J., Falck,G. and Norppa,H. (1996) In vivo cytogenetic damage revealed by FISH analysis of micronuclei in uncultured human T lymphocytes. Cytogenet. Cell Genet., 75, 151–154.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Zijno,A., Marcon,F., Leopardi,P. and Crebelli,R. (1994) Simultaneous detection of X-chromosome loss and non-disjunction in cytokinesis-blocked human lymphocytes by in situ hybridization with centromeric DNA probe; implications for the human lymphocyte in vitro micronucleus assay using cytochalasin B. Mutagenesis, 9, 225–232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Zijno,A., Marcon,F., Leopardi,P. and Crebelli,R (1996a) Analysis of chromosome segregation in cytokinesis-blocked human lymphocytes: non-disjunction is the prevalent damage resulting from low concentration exposure to spindle poisons. Mutagenesis, 11, 335–340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Zijno,A., Leopardi,P., Marcon,F. and Crebelli,R (1996b) Analysis of chromosome segregation by means of fluorescence in situ hybridization: application to cytokinesis-blocked human lymphocytes. Mutat. Res., 372, 211–219.[Web of Science][Medline]

Received on January 5, 1998; accepted on September 17, 1998.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
A. Wallqvist, R. Huang, D. G. Covell, A. V. Roschke, K. S. Gelhaus, and I. R. Kirsch
Drugs aimed at targeting characteristic karyotypic phenotypes of cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2005; 4(10): 1559 - 1568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
C. Rosefort, E. Fauth, and H. Zankl
Micronuclei induced by aneugens and clastogens in mononucleate and binucleate cells using the cytokinesis block assay
Mutagenesis, July 1, 2004; 19(4): 277 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
D. Cimini, B. Moree, J. C. Canman, and E. D. Salmon
Merotelic kinetochore orientation occurs frequently during early mitosis in mammalian tissue cells and error correction is achieved by two different mechanisms
J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2003; 116(20): 4213 - 4225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
H. Norppa and G. C.-M. Falck
What do human micronuclei contain?
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2003; 18(3): 221 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
M. Schuler, P. Muehlbauer, P. Guzzie, and D.A. Eastmond
Noscapine hydrochloride-induced numerical aberrations in cultured human lymphocytes: a comparison of FISH detection methods and multiple end-points
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2003; 18(3): 235 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
P. Thomas, K. Umegaki, and M. Fenech
Nucleoplasmic bridges are a sensitive measure of chromosome rearrangement in the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2003; 18(2): 187 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
G. C.-M. Falck, J. Catalan, and H. Norppa
Nature of anaphase laggards and micronuclei in female cytokinesis-blocked lymphocytes
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2002; 17(2): 111 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
P. Leopardi, F. Marcon, G. Dobrowolny, A. Zijno, and R. Crebelli
Influence of donor age on vinblastine-induced chromosome malsegregation in cultured peripheral lymphocytes
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2002; 17(1): 83 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
D. Cimini, B. Howell, P. Maddox, A. Khodjakov, F. Degrassi, and E.D. Salmon
Merotelic Kinetochore Orientation Is a Major Mechanism of Aneuploidy in Mitotic Mammalian Tissue Cells
J. Cell Biol., April 24, 2001; 153(3): 517 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
M. Fenech
A mathematical model of the in vitro micronucleus assay predicts false negative results if micronuclei are not specifically scored in binucleated cells or in cells that have completed one nuclear division
Mutagenesis, July 1, 2000; 15(4): 329 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
J. M. de Stoppelaar, T. van de Kuil, H. W. Verharen, H. Hokse, A. Opperhuizen, G. R. Mohn, J. van Benthem, and B. Hoebee
In vivo cytokinesis blocked micronucleus assay with carbendazim in rat fibroblasts and comparison with in vitro assays
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2000; 15(2): 155 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
S. Minissi, F. Degrassi, C. Tanzarella, and B. Gustavino
Direct and indirect non-disjunction in the origin of trisomy in cultured human lymphocytes
Mutagenesis, November 1, 1999; 14(6): 557 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
D. Cimini, C. Tanzarella, and F. Degrassi
Differences in malsegregation rates obtained by scoring ana-telophases or binucleate cells
Mutagenesis, November 1, 1999; 14(6): 563 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
A. Carere, A. Antoccia, D. Cimini, R. Crebelli, F. Degrassi, P. Leopardi, F. Marcon, A. Sgura, C. Tanzarella, and A. Zijno
Analysis of chromosome loss and non-disjunction in cytokinesis-blocked lymphocytes of 24 male subjects
Mutagenesis, September 1, 1999; 14(5): 491 - 496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minissi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rizzoni, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minissi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rizzoni, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?