Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by M.Hughes, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, S. E.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by M.Hughes, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, S. E.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 14, No. 1, 71-75, January 1999
© 1999 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Human sperm DNA integrity assessed by the Comet and ELISA assays

Ciara M.Hughes, Valerie J.McKelvey-Martin1 and Sheena E.M. Lewis2

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Queens University of Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BJ and 1 Cancer and Ageing Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
DNA integrity in sperm is essential for the accurate transmission of genetic information and therefore the maintenance of good health in future generations. The ELISA and Comet assays, two techniques that detect DNA damage in cells, are compared in this study of DNA integrity in human sperm. Both techniques rely on alkaline unwinding for the release of single strands of DNA from the nucleus. The ELISA detects single strands immunochemically whereas the Comet assay measures single strands drawn out by electrophoresis, stained with ethidium bromide and quantified by image analysis. The two techniques, both modified for use with sperm, detect similar levels of baseline DNA damage along with similar dose-dependent patterns of induced damage by X-ray irradiation at 10 and 30 Gy (P < 0.05). The assays are also comparable in the detection of a significant protective effect by ascorbic acid (300 and 600 µM) and {alpha}-tocopherol (30 and 60 µM) on DNA integrity, both at baseline levels and following X-ray irradiation (p < 0.01). The advantages and disadvantages of each technique are discussed.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The function and replication of every cell is dependent on its DNA. DNA damage may result in cell death or induction of mutations. In sperm, DNA damage may carry mutations into the next generation or result in male infertility. DNA integrity may become even more important as an indicator of sperm health with the newest treatment for male infertility; intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (Palmero et al., 1992Go; Van Steirteghem et al., 1993Go). Using ICSI, the classical parameters of sperm motility and the ability to recognize and penetrate the oocyte are no longer necessary for fertilization, so a more pertinent test is urgently needed. Many assays have been used to measure DNA damage in mature and immature sperm cells, such as acridine orange staining (Tejada et al., 1984Go; Peluso et al., 1992Go), flow cytometry (Evenson et al., 1991Go), alkaline elution (Joshi et al., 1990Go; Van Loon et al., 1993Go), enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) (Van Loon et al., 1991Go), the single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet) assay (Hughes et al., 1996Go). Two of these assays, ELISA and Comet, are used in this study to compare DNA damage in mature sperm cells. The Comet assay was chosen as it gives detailed information on the quantitation of DNA integrity of individual sperm. The ELISA assay was chosen over the more common technique of acridine orange staining due to the conflicting results in the literature for the latter technique (Classens et al., 1992Go; Liu and Baker, 1992Go; Peluso et al., 1992Go; Sukcharoen, 1995; Eggert-Kruse et al., 1996Go).

The ELISA assay is an immunochemical method for the quantitative detection of DNA damage of a whole population of cells (Van der Schans et al., 1989Go). The method relies on time-dependent partial unwinding of cellular DNA under alkaline conditions. Single- and double-strand breaks form initial points for unwinding. The degree of unwinding is a measure of the extent of DNA damage and this is determined by the use of an anti-single-stranded DNA monoclonal antibody, D1B, which binds to single-stranded DNA. The assay has already been used to study the induction and repair of DNA damage at different cellular stages of spermatogenesis of the hamster but not in mature sperm (Van Loon et al., 1991Go).

Another useful assay for the detection of DNA breakage is the single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet) assay (Singh et al., 1989Go; McKelvey-Martin et al., 1993Go), which is generally performed at high pH and has been shown to be reproducible for measurements in sperm (Hughes et al., 1997Go). This method also depends on unwinding of nuclear DNA under alkaline conditions, followed by electrophoresis that draws out the broken strands of DNA. These strands form a tail to one side of the head (sperm nucleus) which produces the characteristic `comet' image. The DNA can be quantified using image analysis software which measures the amount of DNA migrated to the `tail' and the DNA remaining in the `head'. This assay has been used in one study of damage and repair during spermatogenesis (Wiger et al., 1995Go). DNA integrity in mature human spermatozoa has also been determined (Hughes et al., 1996Go, 1997Go) to demonstrate the resistance of sperm DNA from fertile men to damage by X-ray irradiation.

In the present study both the ELISA and Comet assays are used to assess DNA integrity in sperm from fertile and infertile men. The results for the two assays are compared. A comparison of induced damage by X-irradiation was also made using these two techniques. Sperm have little cytoplasm and therefore limited defences against oxidative attack, which is a major source of DNA damage (Steenken, 1989Go). Most of their antioxidant protection comes from the seminal plasma (Lewis et al., 1997Go). However, during preparation for assisted conception, sperm are isolated from the seminal plasma, leaving them more vulnerable to oxidative attack. The effect of chain breaking antioxidant addition of ascorbic acid and {alpha}-tocopherol during preparation of sperm DNA was therefore also studied.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Semen analysis
Semen samples were obtained from 50 patients, after recommended abstinence from sexual activity for 3 days. Routine semen analysis was carried out by light microscopy. Semen samples from eight normozoospermic (concentration 20x106/ml, motility >50%, normal morphology >30%) men of recently proven fertility and 42 asthenozoospermic (concentration 20x106/ml, motility <50%, normal morphology >30%) (World Health Organisation, 1992Go) infertile men were used for the study.

To select the subpopulation of sperm with the best motility and morphology routinely used in assisted conception techniques, the samples were prepared by two-step discontinuous Percoll gradient centrifugation. Freshly liquified semen was treated as follows: (i) two layer Percoll (95.0–47.5%) centrifugation at 500 g for 20 min; (ii) concentration by centrifugation at 250 g for 10 min; (iii) dilution with Biggers–Whitten–Whittingham medium (BWW; Biggers et al., 1971Go) to a concentration of 1x105/10 µl.

Antioxidant incubation
Semen from 30 of the asthenozoospermic infertile subjects was divided into three prior to Percoll preparation. One control aliquot was then prepared with Percoll as described, while the other two aliquots were prepared in the presence of one of the antioxidants ascorbic acid (300 or 600 µM) or {alpha}-tocopherol (30 or 60 µM).

Induced oxidative damage to DNA and antioxidant protection
Sperm from each of the three aliquots from the antioxidant-treated group were divided into two so that sperm from the same sample could be compared with and without subsequent induced damage. To induce oxidative DNA damage sperm from each sample were irradiated with a dose of 30 Gy at room temperature (Hughes et al., 1996Go).

Sperm from the remaining 20 subjects which had not been treated with antioxidants were divided into three aliquots; one control, one subjected to 10 Gy and the last aliquot to 30 Gy irradiation. X-irradiation was performed using a 300 kV Siemens Stabilipan X-ray source at a dose rate of 2.6 Gy/min.

Comet assay
The modified alkaline Comet assay for sperm (Hughes et al., 1996Go, 1997Go) was carried out on the prepared samples. A slide was prepared for each control, antioxidant-treated and irradiated aliquot.

Fully frosted slides (Richards Supply Company Ltd, London, UK) were covered with 100 µl 0.5% normal melting point agarose (Sigma Chemical Co., Poole, UK), a coverslip added and the agarose allowed to solidify. The coverslips were removed and 1x105 cells in 10 µl BWW were mixed with 90 µl 0.5% low melting point agarose (Sigma) and used to form the second layer. The slides with coverslips removed were then placed in lysis buffer for 1 h [2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM NaEDTA, 10 mM Tris, 1% Triton X-100 and 10% dimethyl sulphoxide (Sigma), pH 10]. The slides were then incubated overnight at 37°C in 100 µl/ml proteinase K (Sigma) added to the lysis buffer. Antioxidants were present in the lysis buffer throughout the incubation.

After draining the proteinase K solution from the slides, they were placed in a horizontal electrophoresis unit filled with fresh alkaline electrophoresis solution containing 300 mM NaOH and 1 mM EDTA (Sigma), pH 12.5, for 20 min to allow the DNA from the cells to unwind. Electrophoresis, for 10 min was performed at room temperature, at 2 V (0.714 V/cm) and 300 mA, obtained by adjusting the buffer level. The slides were then washed with a neutralizing solution of 0.4 M Tris (Sigma), pH 7, to remove alkali and detergents. After neutralization, the slides were stained with 50 µl 20 µg/ml ethidium bromide (Sigma) and covered with a coverslip. All steps were carried out under yellow light to prevent further DNA damage.

Fifty cells from each slide were selected randomly and analysed by image analysis using Hewlett and Packard Super VGA and Fenestra Comet Software (v.2.2). Observations were made at magnification x400 using an epifluorescent microscope (Olympus BH2). Statistical analysis was carried out on the values obtained for the percentage head DNA of each cell. Percentage head DNA is the percentage of DNA which remains in the head of the Comet after specified electrophoresis times and so indicates the amount of undamaged DNA. DNA containing strand breaks is drawn away from the Comet head into the tail.

The ELISA assay
An ELISA assay modified for use with sperm (Van der Schans et al., 1989Go) was carried out on sperm from the same aliquots used to make the slides for the Comet assay. Antibody-coated plates were prepared by addition of 100 µl D1B (10 µg/ml) to each well of a 96-well flat bottom, high binding Costar 3590 plate, vibrated for 10 min at room temperature, washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and dried. After coating, 5% fetal calf serum in PBS was added to each well (150 µl) and again vibrated for 10 min. The plate was then dried thoroughly, packed in aluminium foil and stored at –20°C until required.

Proteinase K (100 µl/ml) was added to Eppendorf tubes containing sperm from each aliquot in BWW medium at a concentration of 3x105 in 30 µl and incubated at 37°C overnight. The following morning 800 µl alkaline solution (1.3 M NaCl) was added to 30 µl from each aliquot (3x105 sperm) and left at 20°C in red light for precisely 6 min. An aliquot of 145 µl neutralizing solution (50 mM Na2PO4) was then added and the sample was freeze thawed. The solution was processed immediately or stored at –20°C.

The unwound DNA sample to be used was brought to room temperature. After vortexing, 20 µl sample were transferred to a test tube and 160 µl alkaline solution were then added and neutralized after 2 min with 20 µl neutralizing solution. The DNA sample had therefore been diluted 10-fold and this represented the 100% single-stranded control sample for the ELISA.

Antibody-coated plates were removed from the freezer and equilibrated to room temperature. Row A was filled with 120 µl PBS and rows B–H with 70 µl PBS. Aliquots of 20 µl sample (a) were added to row A columns 1 + 2 and 20 µl sample (a) 100% control were added to row A columns 3 + 4. This process was repeated for samples (b) and (c). The samples were serially diluted 1:1 in rows A–G by removing 70 µl from row A and transferring it to row B, etc. Row H was the `blank', i.e. contained no DNA. The plate was then vibrated at room temperature for 10 min and washed three times in PBS.

The plate was dried and 100 µl conjugated antibody (D1B-AP diluted 4000 times with PBS containing 5% fetal calf serum and 1% SDS) were added to each well, vibrated at room temperature for 10 min and then washed thoroughly three times with PT. The plate was then washed twice with 0.1 M diethanolamine (100 µl/well), emptied and dried as before. Aliquots of 200 µl p-nitrophenyl phosphate were added to each well and the plate was vibrated briefly before incubation at 25°C for 24 h. The absorbance from each well was then read in a Tikertek Absorbance ELISA plate reader at 405 nm.

Mean values were then calculated for each dilution and the 100% unwound controls and the mean background value was subtracted from these figures. Percentage single-strandedness for each dilution of the sample was calculated by dividing the mean sample values by the corresponding 100% unwound control sample values and multiplying by a dilution factor of 10.

All of the chemicals used for the ELISA were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. The antibody and conjugated antibody were obtained from Dr G.P.Van der Schans (Rijswijk, The Netherlands).

Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out using non-parametric statistics with the Statistica (Statsoft Inc.) package on the values obtained from both assays. Analysis was carried out to determine if the damage induced by X-irradiation was significantly different from the control values within each sample and if the antioxidants had any protective effect against the induced oxidative damage using Student's t-test for dependent samples.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
DNA integrity in fertile and infertile subjects
DNA integrity determined by the ELISA and Comet assays was similar for both fertile and infertile men (Figure 1Go), with 81.3% undamaged DNA (Comet) compared with 80.8% (ELISA) for the infertile group and 81.2% (Comet) compared with 78.8% (ELISA) for the fertile group (Figure 2Go). Following X-irradiation there was good correlation (P < 0.01, r = 0.67) in the pattern of DNA damage detected by the two techniques, each exhibiting dose-dependent increases in damage (Figure 2Go). Significant amounts of damage were detected by ELISA at 10 Gy irradiation (P < 0.001) and the Comet assay (P < 0.05) in sperm from both fertile and infertile subjects (Figure 2Go).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. A scatter plot of the results obtained from the two assays for the comparison of DNA integrity in fertile and infertile men showing a good correlation (P < 0.01, r = 0.67) between the results.

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The effect of X-irradiation on sperm from (a) fertile and (b) infertile men as determined by the Comet and ELISA assays. The mean values ± SD for percentage intact DNA for control {square}, 10 Gy {blacksquare} and 30 Gy are shown. *Significantly different from control (P < 0.05); **significantly different from control (P < 0.01); ***significantly different from control (P < 0.001)

 
The effect of antioxidant supplementation in vitro on DNA integrity
The effects of antioxidant supplementation on sperm DNA show a similar pattern of results for the two techniques, with the presence of antioxidants in the preparation medium significantly improving DNA integrity. There was an increase in intact DNA with ascorbic acid (300 µM) (Figure 3Go) and {alpha}-tocopherol (30 µM) (Figure 4Go) detected by ELISA (P < 0.001) and the Comet assay (P < 0.01). In addition, in both assays 30 Gy X-irradiation significantly damaged the DNA compared with that of control sperm (P < 0.001). The presence of antioxidants provided such protection from X-ray damage that DNA integrity remained at baseline levels (P > 0.05). Again, this effect was observed with both assays (Figures 3 and 4GoGo).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The effect of ascorbic acid present during sperm Percoll preparation as determined by (a) the Comet and (b) the ELISA assays. The mean values ± SD for percentage undamaged DNA for control {square}, 300 µM ascorbic acid {blacksquare} and 600 µM ascorbic acid compared with those exposed to 30 Gy radiation. **Significantly different from the control (P < 0.01); ***significantly different from the control (P < 0.001)

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The effect of {alpha}-tocopherol present during sperm Percoll preparation as determined by (a) the Comet and (b) the ELISA assays. The mean values ± SD for percentage undamaged DNA for control {square}, 30 µM {alpha}-tocopherol {blacksquare} and 60 µM {alpha}-tocopherol compared with 30 Gy radiation. **Significantly different from the control (P < 0.01); ***significantly different from the control (P < 0.001)

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The Comet assay is relatively new in its application to determine DNA damage in sperm, so in this study we compared it with the more established ELISA assay to see how comparable the assays were. Our results indicate that similar baseline DNA integrity is detected for sperm of fertile and infertile subjects using both techniques. Similar dose-dependent patterns of damage induced by X-irradiation were also detected. High doses of X-irradiation were again used in this study as these doses were previously shown to be required to induce significant damage to sperm DNA (Hughes et al., 1996Go, 1997Go). This is probably due to the unique tight packaging arrangement of DNA within the sperm nucleus (Barone et al., 1994Go).

The DNA integrity of sperm by both techniques is low compared with that of somatic cells. This has previously been shown in sperm using the Comet assay (Hughes et al., 1996Go) and to a lesser extent in spermatids, shown by alkaline elution (Van Loon et al., 1993Go) and ELISA (Van Loon et al., 1991Go). As sperm and spermatids no longer possess significant cytoplasm (Sega and Generoso, 1990Go), this higher level of DNA damage may be a result of oxidative damage in the absence of repair (Van Loon et al., 1993Go). It has, however, been shown that some repair of sperm DNA may take place in the oocyte after fertilization (Ashwood-Smith and Edwards, 1996Go), which may explain why a population of cells which appear to be damaged are still capable of creating a genetically healthy embryo.

The addition of antioxidants to the preparation medium during Percoll centrifugation resulted in a higher percentage of intact DNA as measured by both assays, suggesting that some of this baseline DNA damage is due to oxidative attack in the absence of any cellular antioxidant protection. In human semen, defective sperm and neutrophils are potential sources of the oxidant hydrogen peroxide (Aitken et al., 1992Go), therefore centrifugation in the presence of such oxidants during Percoll peparation leaves sperm susceptible to oxidative insult. Both ascorbic acid and {alpha}-tocopherol significantly prevented DNA damage from occurring at the baseline level and following X-irradiation, which was evident from each assay.

Ascorbic acid has previously been shown to reduce DNA damage in studies measuring 8-hydroxy-2-dehydroguanosine, one of the major products of DNA damage (Fraga et al., 1991Go; Jacob et al., 1992Go). The reason for the positive effects of this antioxidant is its role as a scavenger of all major reactive oxygen species, including the hydroxyl radical, the major product of X-irradiation. Ascorbic acid appears to be the most important chain breaking antioxidant for sperm DNA protection, as it is the most abundant one found in seminal plasma (Lewis et al., 1997Go). It is actively secreted into the seminal plasma by the seminal vesicle during ejaculation (Berg et al., 1941Go) and it has been found to have a greater protective effect on sperm DNA in vitro than {alpha}-tocopherol, urate or acetylcysteine (Hughes et al., 1998Go).

{alpha}-Tocopherol is also a chain breaking antioxidant, but is found in only small quantities in seminal plasma (Lewis et al., 1997Go). However, these low concentrations do not reflect the obvious importance of this antioxidant, as {alpha}-tocopherol also significantly prevented DNA damage to baseline values by X-irradiation. The low concentrations found in the seminal plasma may be sufficient to prevent oxidative attack because it is rapidly regenerated by ascorbic acid, as in other cells (Kagan et al., 1992Go).

As the ELISA and Comet assays provide similar overall results for sperm DNA, other aspects of the assays should be considered. Both of the assays are simple, although technically time consuming, and data can be obtained after 32 h for the Comet assay and 48 h for ELISA. The automated measurement of absorbance for ELISA by a plate reader is faster than analysis of 50 individual cells for each slide in the Comet assay, but ELISA does require a larger population of cells. The Comet assay requires only 50 cells from each population, a number that has been found to be sufficient for reproducibility of the assay (Hughes et al., 1997Go). Also, as subpopulations can be assessed separately in the Comet assay, resistant subgroups may be identified in a heterogeneous population such as that found in semen (Hughes et al, 1996Go).

It is possible to freeze the cells for analysis by ELISA assay following alkaline unwinding with no induction of additional damage. This confers the advantage of storing a large number of samples for analysis at a later stage. Although sperm may be analysed by the Comet assay following freezing with a cryopreservative (Anderson et al., 1997aGo), there is no intermediate stage at which the assay may be stopped. However, once the slides are prepared for the Comet assay, they can be dried and stored for analysis at a later date. After the initial set-up expense of purchasing equipment for each, the running cost of the ELISA assay is approximately three times that of the Comet assay.

In conclusion, the ELISA and Comet assays are both useful in the detection of DNA damage in sperm as they provide comparable results of total damage in a given population of cells. This confirms our belief that the Comet assay is as accurate as established methods. The main advantage of the Comet over the ELISA assay is that DNA damage can be assessed in individual cells and its distribution assessed giving detailed information on the pattern of damage.

The Comet assay has numerous applications. The assay may have a future in the determination of DNA integrity prior to ICSI, especially since the technique may be carried out using few sperm. This would be an advantage as ICSI is often carried out using samples with few sperm present. The addition of antioxidants to incubation media for ICSI requires additional investigation. The present study is in agreement with other work carried out using the Comet assay, that antioxidants such as ascorbic acid, {alpha}-tocopherol and urate (Hughes et al., 1998Go) and flavonoids (Anderson et al., 1997bGo) have a protective effect against sperm DNA damage. This may increase the probability of fertilization following ICSI.

The Comet assay could also be applied in the biomonitoring of mutagen exposure as the assay has been shown both here and in previous publications to be useful in the detection of damage by chemicals such as hydrogen peroxide (Hughes et al., 1996Go) and estrogen-like compounds (Anderson et al., 1997cGo) to sperm DNA. We conclude that the Comet assay is a preferred technique over ELISA for the detection of damage in a population and the technique has many possible applications.


    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by Wellcome Project Grant No. 049993/Z/97/Z. The authors would like to thank Dr Van der Schans for kindly allowing us to use his antibody for the ELISA assay. The skilful technical assistance of Mrs M.Kennedy is gratefully acknowledged.


    Notes
 
2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: 01232 894633 ext. 3987; Fax: 01232 248005; Email: s.e.lewis{at}qub.ac.uk Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

    Aitken,R.J., Buckingham,D., West,K., Wu,F.C., Zikopoulos,K. and Richard,D.W. (1992) On the contribution of leukocytes and spermatozoa to the high levels of reactive oxygen species recorded in the ejaculates of oligozoospermic patients. J. Reprod. Fertil., 94, 451–462.[Abstract]

    Anderson,D., Dobrzynska,M.M., Yu,T.W., Gandini,L., Cordelli,E. and Spano,M. (1997a) DNA integrity in human sperm. Teratogen. Carcinogen. Mutagen., 17, 97–102.[ISI][Medline]

    Anderson,D., Basaran,N., Dobrzynska,M.M., Basaran,A.A. and Yu,T.W. (1997b) Modulating effects of flavonoids on food mutagens in human blood and sperm samples in the Comet Assay. Teratogen. Carcinogen. Mutagen., 17, 45–58.[ISI][Medline]

    Anderson,D., Dobrzynska,M.M. and Basaran,N. (1997c) Effect of various genotoxins and reproductive toxins in human lymphocytes and sperm in the Comet Assay. Teratogen. Carcinogen. Mutagen., 17, 29–43.[ISI][Medline]

    Ashwood-Smith,M.J. and Edwards,R.G. (1996) DNA repair by oocytes. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 2, 46–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Barone,J.G., De Lara,J., Cummings,K.B. and Ward,W.S. (1994) DNA organisation in human spermatozoa. J. Androl., 15, 139–144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Berg,M.B., Huggins,C. and Hodges,C.V. (1941) Concentration of ascorbic acid and the phosphatase in secretion of the male genital tract. Am. J. Physiol., 133, 82–87.

    Biggers,J.D., Whitten,W.K. and Whittingham,D.G. (1971) The culture of mouse embryos in vitro. In David,J.C. (ed.), Methods in Mammalian Embryology. Freeman Press, San Francisco, CA, pp. 86–94.

    Classens,O.E., Menkfeld,R. and Franken,D.R., (1992) The acridine orange test: determining the relationship between sperm morphology and fertilisation in vitro. Hum. Reprod., 7, 242–247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Eggert-Kruse,W., Rohr,G., Kerbel,H., Schwalbach,B., Demirakca,T., Klinga,K., Tilgen,W. and Runnebaum,B. (1996) The acidine orange test: a clinically relevant screening method for sperm quality during infertility investigation? Hum. Reprod., 11, 784–789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Evenson,D.P., Jost,L.K., Baer,R.K., Turner,T.W. and Schrader,S.M. (1991) Individuality of DNA denaturation patterns in human sperm as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay. Reprod. Toxicol., 5, 115–125.[ISI][Medline]

    Fraga,C.G., Motchnik,P.A., Shigenaga,M.K., Helbock,H.J., Jacob,R.A. and Ames,B.N. (1991) Ascorbic acid protects against endogenous oxidative damage in human sperm. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 11003–11006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Hughes,C.M., Lewis,S.E.M., McKelvey-Martin,V.J. and Thompson,W. (1996) A comparison of baseline and induced DNA damage in human sperm from fertile and infertile man, using a modified comet assay. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 2, 613–619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Hughes, C.M., Lewis,S.E.M., McKelvey-Martin,V.J. and Thompson,W. (1997) Reproducibility of human sperm DNA measurements using the single cell gel electrophoresis assay. Mutat. Res., 347, 261–268.

    Hughes,C.M, Lewis,S.E.M., McKelvey-Martin,V.J. and Thompson,W. (1998) The effects of antioxidant supplementation during Percoll preparation on human sperm DNA integrity. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 13, 1240–1247.

    Jacob,R.A., Kelley,D.S., Pianalto,F.S., Swendseid,M.E., Henning,S.M., Zhang,J.Z., Ames,B.N., Fraga,C.G. and Peters,J.H. (1992) Cellular ascorbate depletion in healthy men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 54, 1302–1309.

    Joshi,D.S., Yick,J., Murray,D. and Meistrich,M.L. (1990) Stage-dependent variation in the radiosensitivity of DNA in developing male germ cells. Radiat. Res., 121, 274–281.[ISI][Medline]

    Kagan,V.E., Serbinova,E.A., Forte,T., Scita,G. and Packer,L. (1992) Recycling of vitamin E in low density lipoproteins. J. Lipid Res., 33, 385–397.[Abstract]

    Lewis,S.E.M., Sterling,S. Young,I. Thompson,W. (1997) Comparison of individual antioxidants and total antioxidant capacity of sperm and seminal plasma in fertile and infertile men. Fertil. Steril., 67, 142–147.[ISI][Medline]

    Liu,D.Y. and Baker,H.W.G. (1992) Tests of human sperm function and fertilisation in vitro. Fertil. Steril., 58, 465–483.[ISI][Medline]

    McKelvey-Martin,V.J., Green,M.H.L., Schmer,P., Pool-Zobel,B.L., DeMeo,M.P. and Collins,A. (1993) The single cell gel electrophoresis assay (comet assay): a European review. Mutat. Res., 288, 47–63.[ISI][Medline]

    Palmero,G., Joris ,H., Devroey,P. and Van Steirteghem,A. (1992) Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet, 340, 17.[ISI][Medline]

    Peluso,J.J., Luciano,A.A. and Nulsen,J.C. (1992) The relationship between alterations in spermatozoal deoxyribonucleic acid, heparin binding sites and semen quality. Fertil. Steril., 57, 665–670.[ISI][Medline]

    Sega,G.A. and Generoso,E. (1990) Measurement of DNA breakage in specific germ cell stages of male mice exposed to acrylamide, using an alkaline elution procedure. Mutat. Res., 242, 79–87.[ISI][Medline]

    Singh,N.P., Danner,D.B., Tice,R.R., McCoy,M.T., Collins,G.D. and Schneider,E.L. (1989) Abundant alkali sensitive sites in DNA of human and mouse sperm. Exp. Cell. Res., 184, 461–470.[ISI][Medline]

    Steenken,S. (1989) Purine bases, nucleosides and nucleotides: aqueous solution redox chemistry and transformation reactions of their radical cations and e– and OH adducts. Chem. Rev., 89, 503–520.

    Sukcharoen,N., Keith,J., Irvine,D.S. and Aitken,R.J. (1996) Prediction of IVF potential of human sperm using sperm function tests. Hum. Reprod., 11, 1030–1034.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Tejada,R.J., Mitchall,J.C., Norman,A., Merik,J.J. and Friedman,S. (1984) A test for practical evaluation of male fertility by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence. Fertil. Steril., 42, 87–91.[ISI][Medline]

    Van der Schans,G., Van Loon,A.A.W.M., Groenendijk,R.H. and Baan,R.A. (1989) Detection of DNA damage in cells exposed to ionising radiation by use of anti-single-stranded DNA momoclonal antibody. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 55, 747–760.[ISI][Medline]

    Van Loon,A.A.W.M., Den Boer,P.J., Van der Schans,G.P., Mackenbach,P., Grootegoed,J.A., Baan,R.A. and Lohman,P.H.M. (1991) Immunochemical detection of DNA damage induction and repair at different cellular stages of spermatogenesis of the hamster after in vitro or in vivo exposure to ionising radiation. Exp. Cell. Res., 193, 303–309.[ISI][Medline]

    Van Loon,A.A.W.M., Sonneveld,E., Hoogerbrugge,J., Van der Schans,G.P., Grootegoed,J.A., Lohman,P.H.M. and Baan,R.A. (1993) Induction and repair of single strand breaks and DNA base damage at different cellular stages of spermatogenesis of the hamster upon in vitro exposure to ionising radiation. Mutat. Res., 294, 139–148.[ISI][Medline]

    Van Steirteghem,A., Liu,J., Joris,H., Nagy,Z., Jannssenswillen,C. and Tournaye,H. (1993) Assisted fertilisation by subzonal insemination and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum. Reprod., 8, 1061–1066.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Wiger,R., Bjorge,C., Holme,J.A., Brunborg,G., Scholz,E., Dybing,E. and Soderlund,E.J. (1995) Chemically induced single strand breaks and their repair in spermatogenic cells. Environ. Mutagen. Hum. Populat., 203, 66.

    World Health Organisation (1992) Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Semen and Sperm Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p. 107.

Received on February 11, 1998; accepted on August 25, 1998.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
A. N. Jha
Ecotoxicological applications and significance of the comet assay
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2008; 23(3): 207 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
E. Cordelli, A. M. Fresegna, A. D'Alessio, P. Eleuteri, M. Spano, F. Pacchierotti, and P. Villani
ReProComet: A New In Vitro Method to Assess DNA Damage in Mammalian Sperm
Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2007; 99(2): 545 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T.E. Schmid, B. Eskenazi, A. Baumgartner, F. Marchetti, S. Young, R. Weldon, D. Anderson, and A.J. Wyrobek
The effects of male age on sperm DNA damage in healthy non-smokers
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 180 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
E. W. Silver, B. Eskenazi, D. P. Evenson, G. Block, S. Young, and A. J. Wyrobek
Effect of Antioxidant Intake on Sperm Chromatin Stability in Healthy Nonsmoking Men
J Androl, July 1, 2005; 26(4): 550 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
K. E. Young, W. A. Robbins, L. Xun, D. Elashoff, S. A. Rothmann, and S. D. Perreault
Evaluation of Chromosome Breakage and DNA Integrity in Sperm: An Investigation of Remote Semen Collection Conditions
J Androl, November 1, 2003; 24(6): 853 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. Sutovsky, R. M. Turner, S. Hameed, and M. Sutovsky
Differential Ubiquitination of Stallion Sperm Proteins: Possible Implications for Infertility and Reproductive Seasonality
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2003; 68(2): 688 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
J. Erenpreiss, S. Hlevicka, J. Zalkalns, and J. Erenpreisa
Effect of Leukocytospermia on Sperm DNA Integrity: A Negative Effect in Abnormal Semen Samples
J Androl, September 1, 2002; 23(5): 717 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I.D. Morris, S. Ilott, L. Dixon, and D.R. Brison
The spectrum of DNA damage in human sperm assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay) and its relationship to fertilization and embryo development
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2002; 17(4): 990 - 998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Barroso, M. Morshedi, and S. Oehninger
Analysis of DNA fragmentation, plasma membrane translocation of phosphatidylserine and oxidative stress in human spermatozoa
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2000; 15(6): 1338 - 1344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Chatterjee, G.A. Haines, D.M.D. Perera, A. Goldstone, and I.D. Morris
Testicular and sperm DNA damage after treatment with fludarabine for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2000; 15(4): 762 - 766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by M.Hughes, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, S. E.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by M.Hughes, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, S. E.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?