Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by K.Giri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by K.Giri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 14, No. 6, 613-620, November 1999
© 1999 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Antimutagenic effects of centchroman—a contraceptive and a candidate drug for breast cancer in multiple mutational assays

Ashok K.Giri*, Amitabha Mukhopadhyay, J. Sun1, Abraham W.Hsie1 and Suprabhat Ray2

Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, 4 Raja S.C.Mullick Road, Jadavpur, Calcutta 700 032, India, 1 Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-1110, USA and 2 Division of Chemical Technology, Central Drug Research Institute, Chattar Manzil Palace, PO Box 173, Lucknow 226 001, India


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Centchroman (CC), a non-steroidal oral contraceptive and a candidate drug for breast cancer, has been reported to exhibit partial to complete remission of lesions in 40.5% of breast cancer patients. The potent anti-oestrogenic activity, negligible side-effects and anti-breast cancer activity of CC prompted us to evaluate the antimutagenic effects of this compound in a bacterial mutagenicity assay and CHO/HPRT and AS52/GPT mutation assays in vitro and in vivo in female Swiss albino mice as measured by both sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and chromosome aberrations (CA) against three known positive mutagen compounds, dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA), cyclophosphamide (CP) and mitomycin C (MMC). Antimutagenicity assays in Salmonella strains TA97a, TA100, TA98 and TA102 were carried out against commonly used known positive mutagens, sodium azide, 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine, cumine hydroperoxide, 2-aminofluorene and danthron. A significantly reduced number of bacterial histidine revertant colonies was observed in the plates treated with 0.1, 1, 5 and 10 µg/plate CC and a positive compound when compared with bacterial plates treated with the respective positive compound alone. Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), a commonly used positive mutagen for CHO/HPRT and AS52/GPT gene mutation assays, was used for antimutagenicity assay in these cells. CC exhibited protective effects against the mutagenicity of EMS in these two mammalian cell mutation assays, CHO/HPRT and AS52/GPT. In the in vivo studies, pretreatment with CC reduced DMBA-induced SCE and CA and CP- and MMC-induced CA when compared with the group treated only with the positive compounds. These results indicate that CC can reduce the mutagenic effects of known genotoxic compounds.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Centchroman (CC), a non-steroidal oral contraceptive, has been developed by the Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India, and has been successfully marketed in India for the last several years (Figure 1Go). The contraceptive efficacy of this compound has been attributed to its multiple hormonal properties (Anand and Ray, 1977Go; Kamboj et al., 1977Go; Kamboj, 1979Go). Both acute and chronic toxicity studies in mice, rats and rhesus monkeys showed that CC did not produce any toxic manifestations (Mukherjee et al., 1977Go; Mishra et al., 1989Go). It was found to be non-genotoxic in bone marrow cells of female mice (Giri and Khan, 1995Go). Oestrogen antagonists have been used in the treatment of breast cancer. CC has been reported to be responsible for partial to complete remission of lesions in 40% of breast cancer patients (Mishra et al., 1989Go). They concluded that CC can be a useful agent for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in both males and females (Mishra et al., 1989Go). The Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India, has also organized phase III clinical trials of breast cancer patients with CC. Out of 171 breast cancer patients, 14 showed >50% response, 55 showed <50% response, 31 showed evidence of stable disease and 71 patients failed to respond to the therapy (Central Drug Research Institute, 1991Go, 1995Go).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Structure of centchroman.

 
We have been testing the in vitro and in vivo genotoxic and antimutagenic effects of different drugs and chemicals in multiple test systems (Giri et al., 1992Go; Giri and Lu, 1995Go; Giri, 1996Go, 1997Go; Philipose et al., 1997Go). Considering the potent anti-oestrogenic activity, negligible side-effects and the anti-breast cancer activity of CC we recognized the need to evaluate the antimutagenic effects of CC in multiple test systems. In the present paper we have evaluated the antimutagenic effects of CC in a mutagenicity assay in Salmonella, the CHO/HPRT and AS52 assays and sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and chromosome aberration (CA) assays in mice against known positive compounds dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA), cyclophosphamide (CP), mitomycin C (MMC) and ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS).


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Inbred strains of female Swiss albino mice (Mus musculus), 10–12 weeks old, weighing 25–30 g, and Charles River male rats of 150–175 g were used for these experiments. They were kept five per cage with husk bedding, were fed standard rodent pellet diet (Gold Mohar; Lipton India Ltd, Chandigarh, India) and water ad libitum. The light cycle was 12 h light and 12 h dark. Room temperature and relative humidity conditions were 28 ± 2°C and 60 ± 5%, respectively.

Chemicals
5-Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) tablets (50 mg each) were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals (Mannheim, Germany). CP, DMBA, MMC, dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) colchicine, biotin, histidine, NADP, glucose 6-phosphate, crystal violet, ampicillin trihydrate, agar, sodium azide (SA), 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine (NPD), EMS, cumine hydroperoxide (CH), 2-aminofluorene (AF), danthron (DN) and sodium ammonium phosphate were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St Louis, MO). The test chemical CC was synthesized, purified and supplied by the Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India.

Bacterial strains
Salmonella tester strains TA97a, TA100, TA98 and TA102 were used for Ames bacterial mutagenecity and antimutagenicity assays. These strains were provided by Dr Bruce N. Ames (Biochemistry Division, University of California, Berkeley, CA).

Bacterial mutagenicity and antimutagenicity assays
Standard plate incorporation tests. Plate incorporation tests were performed as previously described (Maron and Ames, 1983Go). In the plate incorporation assay the test chemical CC was dissolved in DMSO and different concentrations (0.1, 1, 5, 10, 50, 100 and 1000 µg/plate) of this test chemical were used for the mutagenicity assay. The plates were inverted within 1 h and placed in a dark vented incubator at 37°C for 48 h. Similar experiments were carried out for positive mutagens (NPD for TA97a and TA98, SA for TA100 and CH for TA102) and solvent controls (DMSO). Four plates were used for each concentration tested and for both positive controls (mutagens) and a solvent control. After 48 h incubation of the culture plates the revertant colonies on the test plates were counted. The presence of a background lawn on all the plates was confirmed. A similar experiment was also carried out using liver homogenate (S9) fractions. The positive mutagen 2-AF was used for strains TA97a, TA100 and TA98 and DN was used for strain TA102 in the +S9 experiments. So two sets of experiments were carried out with and without S9 mix for all the tester strains.

Antimutagenicity assay. Antimutagenicity assay of CC in a plate incorporation assay was carried out against known positive compounds in TA97a, TA100, TA98 and TA102. In this case both CC (different concentrations as mentioned above) and the respective positive compounds were added to the top agar for the antimutagenicity assay. The rest of the procedure was as described above in the plate incorporation test. Antimutagenicity assay of CC was also carried out using rat liver S9 in strains TA97a, TA100, TA98 and TA102.

In vitro CHO/HPRT and AS52/GPT assays
K1BH4 and AS52, a subclone and a derivative of the CHO-K1 cell line, respectively, were used for selection of HPRT and GPT mutants. K1BH4 cells have a karyotype of 20 chromosomes with an active X chromosome on which the hprt gene is located (Hsie et al., 1975Go, 1986Go). AS52 cells, derived from K1BH4 with an hprt gene deletion, contain a single stable copy of a transfected Escherichia coli gpt gene located on an autosome (Tindall et al., 1984Go, 1986Go), presumably chromosome 6 (Michaelis et al., 1992; K.L.Michaelis, personal communication). Cells were cultured in F12 medium containing 5% dialysed fetal calf serum (F12FCM5).

To decrease the background of HPRT mutants, K1BH4 cells were cultured for 48 h in F12FCM5 medium supplemented with 100 µM hypoxanthine, 10 µM aminopterin and 10 µM thymidine (HAT medium). To decrease the background of GPT mutants, AS52 cells were grown in F12FCM5 medium supplemented with 250 µg/ml xanthine, 25 µg/ml adenine, 5 µM thymidine, 3 µM aminopterin and 10–20 µg/ml mycophenolic acid (MPA medium) for 48 h (An and Hsie, 1992Go). After 48 h recovery in F12FCM5 medium, 105 K1-BH4 cells or 2.5x104 AS52 cells were plated in a 60 mm dish in 3 ml F12FCM5 medium. After another 24 h, the cells were treated with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or CC (10 or 20 µg/ml) in the presence or absence of EMS (200 or 400 µg/ml) (see Tables I and IIGoGo for study design). Cells were then grown in F12FCM5 medium for 7 days to allow full expression of HPRT and GPT mutant phenotypes (Hsie et al., 1975Go; Tindall et al., 1984Go). Depending on the extent of cell survival after mutagen treatment, one or two subcultures were performed during this period. At the end of the full expression period 2x105 cells from the cultures in each original 60 mm dish were plated in each of three 100 mm dishes to select for HPRT or GPT mutants in hypoxanthine-free F12FCM5 medium containing 10 µM 6-thioguanine.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. The protective effects of centchroman on the frequency of hprt mutants induced by EMS in CHO-K1BH4 cells
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. The protective effects of centchroman on the frequency of the gpt mutants induced by EMS in CHO-AS52 cells
 
Aliquots of 200 cells were plated in triplicate in 60 mm dishes in the same medium without 6-thioguanine to determine the cloning efficiency of the cells in the absence of the selective agent, 6-thioguanine. After 7 days incubation the mutant colonies were fixed, stained and counted. Mutant frequency is calculated by dividing the total number of mutant colonies by the total number of cells selected (1x106) corrected for cloning efficiency and is expressed as mutants/106 clonable cells (Hsie et al., 1981Go).

Chromosome aberrations (CA) assay
For CA analysis CC was suspended in distilled water with gum acacia (2%) and was gavaged (0.25–0.3 ml suspension depending on body weight) to three sets of five animals each at the rate of 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg, respectively, for 7 days. A group of five animals were gavaged with an equal volume of distilled water only with 2% gum acacia for 7 days. On day 7, 30 min after the last dose of CC or distilled water (for control only), the positive compound DMBA was gavaged at a rate of 50 mg/kg body wt in corn oil to all mice. Two sets of 20 female mice were also used for a similar experiment for two other positive control mutagens, CP and MMC. Three doses of CC (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) were gavaged to two sets of 15 mice each as described above. CP was gavaged at the rate of 20 mg/kg body wt to all of the 20 mice and MMC was gavaged at a rate of 1.5 mg/kg to another set of 20 mice. For CA analyses, 22 h after treatment with the positive compounds animals were injected (i.p.) with colchicine (2 mg/kg) and 2 h later they were killed by cervical dislocation. Bone marrow chromosomes were prepared and stained with Giemsa following the method of Preston et al. (1987). All the slides were coded and 100 well-spread metaphase cells were scored per animal for CA. A total of 500 metaphase cells were scored for each set of positive control treated groups and also for positive control treated groups pretreated with different doses of CC. Mitotic index (MI) was scored from 1000 cells/animal and is expressed as a percentage. CA were scored following the guidelines of the World Health Organization (1985) and Preston et al. (1987). The aberration frequencies per cell for chromatid and chromosome types were calculated. Gaps were recorded and not included either as percent aberrant cells or as the frequency of aberrations per cell (Sharief et al., 1986Go).

In vivo sister chromatid exchange (SCE) assay
Paraffin-coated (~80% of the surface) BrdU tablets (50 mg each) were implanted s.c. in the flank of mice under diethyl ether anaesthesia following the methodology of McFee et al. (1983) for in vivo SCE study and cell replication kinetic analysis. CC was suspended in distilled water with gum acacia (2%) and was gavaged (0.25–0.3 ml suspension depending on body weight) to three sets of five animals each at a rate of 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg for 7 days. A group of five animals was gavaged with an equal volume of distilled water with 2% gum acacia for 7 days. On day 7, immediately after the last dose of CC and distilled water (for controls only), BrdU tablets were implanted into each mouse. Thirty minutes after tablet implantation the positive compound DMBA was gavaged at 50 mg/kg body wt in corn oil to all mice. Another set of 20 female mice was also used in a similar experiment with another positive control compound, CP. Three doses of CC were gavaged to 15 mice as described above. CP was gavaged at the rate of 10 mg/kg body wt to all the 20 mice 30 min after tablet implantation. For SCE analysis, colchicine (4 mg/kg) was injected (i.p.) 22 h after BrdU tablet implantation. The rest of the procedure was as described above (Preston et al., 1987Go). Slides were prepared and chromosomes were differentially stained by the fluorescence-plus-Giemsa technique (Perry and Wolff, 1974; World Health Organization, 1985Go). All slides were coded and 30 second division metaphase cells (40 ± 2 chromosomes) per animal were scored for SCE frequencies, i.e. a total of 150 cells were scored from five animals in each set of positive control treated groups and from the positive control treated groups pretreated with different doses of CC. Randomly selected metaphase cells (100/animal) were scored for replicative index (RI) analysis following the method of Ivett and Tice (1982).

Statistical analysis
Mutagenicity and antimutagenicity results for the different concentrations of chemicals with bacteria were compared with the negative and positive controls by Dunnett's multiple comparison with controls (Dunnett, 1955Go). SCE, CA, MI and RI results were also compared with their respective positive controls by Dunnett's multiple comparison with controls and the level of significance is given in the respective tables. Results of the CHO/HPRT and AS52/GPT assays were compared with the respective controls by Fisher's protected least significant difference procedure.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mutagenicity and antimutagenicity assays in Salmonella
Tables III and IVGoGo show the results of mutagenicity and antimutagenicity assays in Salmonella strains TA97a, TA100, TA98 and TA102. CC did not show any mutagenic effect in any of the tester strains described above. In strains TA97a and TA100 toxicity was induced at 50 µg/plate both with and without S9 mix. Antimutagenicity assays in both strains showed ~10–30% protective effects of CC against NPD and SA at the concentrations of 1, 5 and 10 µg/plate without S9 mix and an ~12–25% protective effect was observed against AF at concentrations of 1, 5 and 10 µg/plate with S9 mix (Tables III and IVGoGo). In strain TA98 toxicity was also observed at a concentration of 50 µg/plate, at which a statistically significant decrease in revertant colonies was observed. Similarly, ~15–28% protective effects of CC in strain TA98 were observed at concentrations of 0.1, 1 and 10 µg/plate without S9 mix and ~15–45% protective effects were observed at concentrations of 0.1, 1 and 10 µg/plate with S9 mix (Tables III and IVGoGo). As expected, CC did not show any mutagenic effects in strain TA102. Toxicity was induced at 100 µg/plate. In strain TA102 an ~12–47% protective effect of CC was observed at concentrations of 0.1, 1, 10 and 50 µg/plate without S9 mix and ~19–32% protective effect was observed at concentrations of 0.1, 1, 10 and 50 µg/plate with S9 mix (see Tables III and IVGoGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Mutagenic and antimutagenic effects of centchroman (CC) in the plate incorporation test using Salmonella strains TA97a, TA100, TA98 and TA102 without S9
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV. Mutagenic and antimutagenic effects of centchroman (CC) in the plate incorporation test using Salmonella strains TA97a, TA100, TA98 and TA102 with S9
 
Mutagenicity and antimutagenicity in CHO/HPRT and AS52 assays
Toxicity. CC exhibits slight toxic effects in both CHO-K1BH4 and CHO-AS52 cells. CC shows a slight protective effect against the toxic effect of EMS (200 or 400 µg/ml). The protective effect of CC is more pronounced at 20 than at 10 µg/ml (data not shown).

Mutagenicity and antimutagenicity assays. We tested the antimutagenic effects of CC in the CHO/HPRT and AS52/GPT assays. We found that in the CHO/HPRT assay, CC is not mutagenic at a concentration of 10 µg/ml but showed a slight mutagenic effect at high dose (20 µg/ml). EMS (200 and 400 µg/ml) exhibits a dose-dependent increase in induced mutant frequency and treatment of cells with CC (10 and 20 µg/ml) reduces EMS (200 and 400 µg/ml) mutagenicity. CC at 20 µg/ml exhibits a higher protective effect than at 10 µg/ml. CC showed a 15–38% protective effect against EMS at 10 µg/ml and a 29–55% protective effect at 20 µg/ml (see Table IGo).

Similar results were found in the AS52/GPT assay. CC exhibits a slight mutagenicity at these doses, EMS shows a dose-dependent mutagenicity and CC exhibits antimutagenic activity against EMS mutagenicity. CC exhibits a 16–34% protective effect against EMS mutagenicity at 10 µg/ml and a 33–47% protective effect at 20 µg/ml (Table IIGo).

Antimutagenic effects in vivo in mice
Table VGo shows the results of the antimutagenicity assay of CC as measured by CA against three positive compounds, DMBA, CP and MMC, in female mice when fed orally. A statistically significant decrease in CA was observed in the DMBA-treated group pretreated with CC at a dose of 20 mg/kg for 7 days when compared with the group which received only DMBA. In this case the protective effect was ~36%. CC showed a very weak protective effect against CP. A weak (5% level) but statistically significant decrease in CA was observed in the CP-treated group pretreated with CC at a dose of 10 mg/kg for 7 days when compared with the group that received only CP. The protective effect was only 19%. In the MMC-treated series, a significant decrease in CA was observed in all three sets of MMC-treated groups pretreated with 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg CC when compared with the group which received only MMC. The protective effects of CC in these MMC-treated groups were ~30–55%. A significant decrease in MI was observed at the highest dose in all CC-treated groups, indicating a slight cytotoxic effect of CC at this dose (see Table VGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table V. Antimutagenic effects of centchroman against the known positive mutagens DMBA, cyclophosphamide and mitomycin C as measured by chromosome aberrations
 
Table VIGo show the results of the antimutagenicity assay of CC as measured by SCE against two positive compounds, DMBA and CP. As observed in the CA study, a statistically significant protective effect was observed in DMBA-treated series pretreated with 20 mg/kg CC when compared with DMBA alone. No statistically significant differences were observed in CP-treated series pretreated with any of the doses of CC when compared with the CP-alone group. A significant decrease in RI was observed in both DMBA- and CP-treated groups pretreated with 20 and 40 mg/kg CC when compared with the respective positive compounds alone (see Table VIGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table VI. Antimutagenic effects of centchroman against known positive mutagens DMBA and cyclophosphamide as measured by sister chromatid exchanges
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The reported onco-protective effect of CC on breast cancer (Mishra et al., 1989Go; Central Drug Research Institute, 1991Go, 1995Go) and its potent anti-oestrogenic activity with negligible side-effects has prompted us to examine the antimutagenic effects of this compound against known positive mutagens in multiple test systems. Chemically induced cancers are primarily due to the ability of the chemical to damage DNA and to induce CA, SCE and gene mutations. These biomarkers for DNA damage can be used to assess the antigenotoxic potential of a chemical. Our main objective was to investigate whether racemic centchroman, having antimutagenic effects and with an anti-cancer profile similar to tamoxifen (TM), could replace the latter for toxicity reasons. CC has been resolved into l- and d-enantiomers (Salman et al., 1986Go), of which the l form is biologically active (see Figure 1Go). Work is also in progress to study whether l-centchroman has better antimutagenic properties or whether the pharmacologically inert d form has any advantage in reducing mutagenicity. These are the aims for our future research. In the present study we report the antimutagenic effects of racemic centchroman.

CC is not mutagenic in Salmonella strains TA97a, TA98, TA100 and TA102 in plate incorporation assays either with or without S9 activation (see Tables III and IVGoGo). It reduces the mutagenic activities of the known mutagens SA, NPD, AF, CH and DN. The overall protective effects of CC in the antimutagenicity assay in these strains were ~10–47%. These protective effects of CC may be due to a direct interaction of these mutagens with CC. Initially we also tried to see whether we could increase the protective effect in the antimutagenicity assay of CC using preincubation tests for TA97a and TA100. However, the protective effects were almost the same as observed in the plate test for these two strains (data not presented). Thus, we decided to study the antimutagenic effects of CC only in the plate incorporation test. CC also exhibits antimutagenic activities in both the CHO/HPRT and AS52/GPT assays.

We conducted the in vivo antimutagenicity studies of CC in female Swiss albino mice based on the dose recommended for human breast cancer patients in clinical trials at the Central Drug Research Institute (1991). The best effective human dose converted to a mouse dose was ~20 mg/kg body wt. Thus, we selected one lower (10 mg/kg) and one higher (40 mg/kg) dose relative to this effective dose (20 mg/kg) for our in vivo studies in mice. We have chosen CA and SCE for in vivo antimutagenicity assay since these are the two cytogenetic end-points which detect the genotoxic potential of a chemical. We have reported earlier that the soya-derived phyto-oestrogen genistein has a significant protective effect against the known breast cancer inducing compound DMBA (Giri and Lu, 1995Go) as measured by SCE and DNA adduct formation. Genistein is a weak oestrogen (Eldridge, 1982Go; Stob, 1983Go; Price and Fenwick, 1985Go) that may also act as an anti-oestrogen by competing with endogenous oestrogens for oestrogen receptors (Martin et al., 1978Go; Verdeal et al., 1980Go). Like genistein, CC is a weak oestrogen and also acts as an anti-oestrogen. Our results of in vivo CA assay showed a significant protective effect of CC in a DMBA-treated group pretreated with CC (20 mg/kg) and a MMC-treated group pretreated with all three doses of CC (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) in mice. Pretreatment with CC also reduced SCE induced by DMBA. The most effective dose of CC was 20 mg/kg body wt for both the CA and SCE assays. It is interesting to note that the maximum protective effects of CC were observed at the dose of 20 mg/kg, which was very close to the human dose in clinical trials with human breast cancer patients (Central Drug Research Institute, 1991Go, 1995Go). CC showed a very weak protective effect against the CP. Since CC has an onco-protective effect (Mishra et al., 1989Go), it may also be effective only against the cancer inducing compounds DMBA and MMC. The onco-protective effects as reported earlier may be attributed, in part, to the ability of CC to reduce the levels of genetic damage induced by known carcinogenic compounds.

CC inhibits both the MI and RI in CA and SCE studies. The extents of inhibition, while small, were statistically significant and most likely biologically relevant since the RI was calculated based on the presence of metaphase chromosomes, which requires cell cycle progression. Any compound that severely blocks cell cycle progression would produce few metaphase cells for scoring. Thus, RI estimation based on metaphase cells tends to underestimate the ability of a compound to inhibit replication. These data suggest that CC inhibits cell replication.

In summary, we show that CC reduces revertant colonies in the Ames assay and mutagenic effects in the CHO/HPRT and AS52/GPT assays induced by the known positive compounds NPD, SA, 2-AF, CH, DN and EMS in vitro. It also reduces both CA and SCE induced by DMBA and CA induced by MMC. The mechanism responsible for the reduction in DMBA-induced CA and SCE and MMC-induced CA is currently unknown. CC is structurally similar to the non-steroidal anti-oestrogen TM (Ray et al., 1994Go). Ferlini et al. (1997) reported that TM can induce apoptosis and has some antiproliferative activity in human breast cancer cells. Thus, the protective activities of CC against the known positive mutagens in the present study may be due to induction of apoptosis by CC, which leads to the elimination of cells damaged by these mutagens from the cell population. Determination of the antimutagenic effects of both the enantiomers of CC is in progress and will be reported later. Determination of induction of apoptosis by CC and its enantiomers in MCF-7 and CHO cell lines is also in progress, to better understand the exact mechanism of action of this drug. Since CC is a candidate drug for breast cancer treatment, more information is required on the mechanism of action of this drug in mammalian systems.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors are grateful to the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, for sanctioning the centchroman research project by A.K.G., sanction no. SP/SO/B-53/95, and also providing the Junior Research Fellowship to A.M. The authors express their appreciation to Dr Bruce Ames, University of California at Berkely, for supplying Salmonella strains.


    Notes
 
* *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +91 33 473 0492; Fax: +91 33 473 5197; Email: iichbio{at}gisclo1.vsnl.net.in Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

    Anand,N. and Ray,S. (1977) A post-coital contraceptive agent. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 15, 1142–1143.[Web of Science][Medline]

    An,J. and Hsie,A.W. (1992) Effects of an inhibitor and a mimic of superoxide dismutase on bleomycin mutagenesis in Chinese hamster overy cells. Mutat. Res., 270, 167–175.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Central Drug Research Institute (1991) Dossier of Centchroman, Vol. 18. Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India.

    Central Drug Research Institute (1995) Annual Report of the Central Drug Research Institute 1994–95. Area Antifertility. Centchroman Phase III Trials in Advanced Cancer of Breast. Maheshwari & Sons, Lucknow, India, p. 1.

    Dunnett,C.W. (1955) A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with the control. J. Am. Statist. Assoc., 50, 1096–1121.[Web of Science]

    Eldridge,A.C.(1982) Determination of isoflavones in soya-bean flours, protein concentrates and isolates. J. Agric. Food Chem., 30, 353–355.

    Ferlini,C., Scambia,G., Distefano,M., Filippini,P., Isola,G., Riva,A., Bombardelli,E., Fattorossi,A., Benedetti Panici,P. and Mancuso,S. (1997) Synergistic antiproliferative activity of tamoxifen and docetaxel on three oestrogen receptor-negative cancer cell lines is mediated by the induction of apoptosis. Br. J. Cancer, 75, 884–891.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Giri,A.K. (1996) Genetic toxicology of four commonly used benzodiazepines: a review. Mutat. Res., 340, 93–108.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Giri,A.K. (1997) Genetic toxiclogy of epichlorohydrin: a review. Mutat. Res., 386, 25–38.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Giri,A.K. and Khan,K.A.(1995) Absence of sister chromatid exchange and chromosome aberrations in mice after in vivo exposure of centchroman—a new non-steroidal oral contraceptive. Cytologia, 60, 167–172.

    Giri,A.K. and Lu,L.J.W. (1995) Genetic damage and the inhibition of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene induced genetic damage by the phytoestrogens, genistein and daidzein, in female ICR mice. Cancer Lett., 95, 125–133.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Giri,A.K., Sai Sivam,S., Khan,K.A. and Sethi,N. (1992) Sister chromatid exchange and chromosome aberrations in mice after in vivo exposure of Green S—a food colorant. Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 19, 223–226.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Hsie,A.W., Briner,P.A., Mitchell,T.J. and Gosslee,D.G. (1975) The dose response relationships for ethyl methansulphonate-induced mutations at the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase locus in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Somat. Cell Genet., 1, 247–261.

    Hsie,A.W., Cassiano,D.A., Couch,D.B., Krahn,D.G., O'Neill,J.P. and Whitfield,B.L. (1981) The use of chinese hamster ovary cells to quantify specific locus mutation and to determine mutagenicity of chemicals: a report of the GENE-TOX programme. Mutat. Res., 86, 193–214.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Hsie,A.W., Resio,L., Katz,K.S., Lee,C.Q., Wagner,M. and Schenley,R.L. (1986) Evidence for reactive oxygen species inducing mutations in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 9616–9620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Ivett,J.L. and Tice,R.R. (1982) Average generation time: a new method for analyzing cellular proliferation kinetics based on bromodeoxyuridine-dependent chromosome differential staining patterns. Environ. Mutagen., 4, 358–364.

    Kamboj,V.P. (1979) In Talwar,G.P. (ed.), Recent Advances in Reproduction and Regulation of Fertility. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, p. 353.

    Kamboj,V.P., Setty,B.S., Chandra,H., Roy,S.K. and Kar,A.B. (1977) Biological profile of centchroman—a new postcoital contraceptive. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 15, 1140–1150.

    Maron,D.M. and Ames,B.N. (1983) Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat. Res., 113, 173–215.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Martin,P.M., Horwitz,K.B., Ryan,D.S. and McGuire,W.L. (1978) Phytoestrogen interaction with estrogen receptors in human breast cancer. Endocrinology, 103, 1860–1867.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    McFee,A.F., Lowe,K. and San Sebastian,J.R. (1983) Improved sister chromatid differentiation using paraffin coated bromodeoxyuridine tablets in mice. Mutat. Res., 119, 83–88.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Michaelis,K., Helvering,L., Kinding,D., Garriott,M. and Richardson,S. (1992) Localization of the xanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase gene (gpt) of E.coli in AS52 metaphase cells by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 19 (suppl. 20), 42.

    Mishra,N.C., Nigam,P.K., Gupta,R., Agarwal,A.K. and Kamboj,V.P. (1989) Centchroman—a nonsteroidal anticancer agent for advanced breast cancer: phase II study. Int. J. Cancer, 43, 781–783.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Mukherjee,S.S., Sethi,N., Srivastava,G.N., Roy,A.K., Nityanand,S. and Mukherjee,S.K. (1977) Chronic toxicity studies of centchroman in rats and rhesus monkeys. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 15, 1151–1153.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Perry,P. and Wolf,S. (1974) New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids. Nature, 251, 156–158.[Medline]

    Philipose,B., Singh,R., Khan,K.A. and Giri,A.K. (1997) Comparative mutagenic and genotoxic effects of three propionic acid derivatives ibuprofen, ketoprofen and naproxen. Mutat. Res., 393, 123–131.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Preston,R.J., Dean,B.J., Galloway,S., Holden,H., McFee,A.F. and Shelby,M. (1987) Mammalian in vivo cytogenetic assays: analysis of chromosome aberrations in bone marrow cells. Mutat. Res., 189, 157–165.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Price,K.R. and Fenwick,G.R. (1985) Naturally occurring oestrogens in food—a review. Food Addit. Contam., 2, 73–106.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Ray,S., Tandon,A., Dwivedy,I., Wilson,S.R., O'Neil,J.P. and Katzennellengogen,J.A. (1994) An X-ray crystallographic study of the nonsteroidal contraceptive agent centchroman. J. Med. Chem., 37, 696–700.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Salman,M., Ray,S., Anand,N., Agarwal,A.K., Singh,M.M., Setty,B.S. and Kamboj,V.P. (1986) Studies in antifertility agents 50. Stereo-selective binding of d- and l-centchromans to estrogen receptor and their anti-fertility activity. J. Med. Chem., 29, 1801–1803.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Sharief,Y., Brown,A.M., Backer,L.C., Campbell,J.L., Westbrook-Collins,B., Stead,A.G. and Allen,J.W. (1986) Sister chromatid exchange and chromosome aberration analyses in mice after in vivo exposure to acrylonitrile, styrene, or butadiene monoxide. Environ. Mutagen., 8, 439–448.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Stob,M. (1983) Naturally occurring food toxicants: estrogens. In Rechcigal,M.,Jr (ed.), CRC Handbook of Naturally Occurring Food Toxicants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 81–100.

    Tindall,K.R., Stankowski,L.F.Jr, Machanoff,R. and Hsie,A.W. (1984) Detection of deletion of mutations in pSV2 gpt-transformed cells. Mol. Cell. Biol., 4, 1411–1415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Tindall,K.R., Stankowski,L.F.Jr, Machanoff,R. and Hsie,A.W. (1986) Analyses of mutation in pSV2 gpt-transformed CHO cells. Mutat. Res., 160, 121–131.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Verdeal,K., Brown,R.R., Richardson,T. and Ryan,D.S. (1980) Affinity of phytooestrogens for the oestradiol-binding proteins and effect of coumestrol on the growth of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene induced rat mammary tumors. J. Natl Cancer Inst., 64, 285–290.

    World Health Organization (1985) Environmental Health Criteria, Vol. 46, Guidelines for the Study of Genetic Effects in Human Populations. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 29–44.

Received on June 9, 1999; accepted on August 12, 1999.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by K.Giri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by K.Giri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?