Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thierens, H.
Right arrow Articles by De Ridder, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thierens, H.
Right arrow Articles by De Ridder, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 15, No. 3, 245-249, May 2000
© 2000 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Cytogenetic monitoring of hospital workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation using the micronucleus centromere assay

H. Thierens3, A. Vral1, R. Morthier2, B. Aousalah and L. De Ridder1

Department of Biomedical Physics and Radiation Protection, University of Ghent, Proeftuinstraat 86, 1 Department of Anatomy, Embryology and Histology, University of Ghent, L. Pasteurlaan 2, and 2 Occupational Medicine Service IDEWE, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A cytogenetic study was performed in lymphocytes of hospital workers occupationally exposed to X- and {gamma}-rays using the micronucleus centromere assay. A comparison of the data for the exposed group and an age-matched group of non-exposed hospital workers showed a significant (P < 0.05) increase in centromere-positive micronuclei for the radiation workers, while no effect on centromere-negative micronuclei was present. The observed systematic increase in micronucleus frequency with age was mainly due to increased chromosome loss, reflected in the centromere-positivity of the micronuclei. The micronucleus frequencies were 40% higher in females than in males, which can again be attributed to higher chromosome loss. Two exposed individuals showed exceptionally high micronucleus yields, 90% of which were centromere-positive. In situ hybridization with a centromeric probe for chromosome X shows that X chromosome loss is responsible for these high micronucleus yields. In the studied population, smoking had no significant effect on the micronucleus yields. The results obtained indicate that in contrast to the predominantly clastogenic action of acute exposure to ionizing radiation, the aneugenic properties of radiation may be important after long-term chronic low dose exposure.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
There are indications from epidemiological studies that radiologists and other medical X-ray workers may show increased mortality due to cancer and leukemia (Smith and Doll, 1981Go; Wang et al., 1988Go; Aoyama, 1989Go). Cytogenetic studies of hospital workers occupationally exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation also revealed an enhanced baseline level of chromosomal aberrations compared with control populations (Bigatti et al., 1988Go; Jha and Sharma, 1991Go; Barquinero et al., 1993Go). Cytogenetic monitoring of this group of workers is of special value as dose estimates from personal dosimetry in hospitals are very crude and unreliable compared with the nuclear industry. Usually the film badge is worn underneath the lead apron, which introduces a very serious underestimation of the real dose.

Although cytogenetic analyses for dicentrics and translocations are the state of the art techniques for biological dosimetry, application of these techniques for biomonitoring or screening of relatively large groups of radiation workers is difficult as chromosome analyses are time consuming and require highly skilled personnel. The cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay of peripheral blood lymphocytes (Fenech and Morley, 1985Go) is a valuable and less laborious alternative for large scale studies (Thierens et al., 1999Go). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with a pancentromeric probe on micronucleus preparations allows distinction between the clastogenic and aneugenic actions of radiation (Kirsch-Volders et al., 1997Go). Scoring of micronuclei with and without centromeres has increased the sensitivity of the technique substantially for monitoring of radiation workers (Vral et al., 1997Go). According to Streffer et al. (1998), the micronucleus centromere assay is able to detect the effects of chronic exposure in uranium miners a long time after exposure.

Using the micronucleus centromere assay we performed a large scale cytogenetic study of hospital workers occupationally exposed to X-rays or to radiation from radioactive sources. An age-matched population of doctors and nursing staff of departments such as pediatrics, where exposure to ionizing radiation is neglegible, served as a control group. Apart from a direct comparison between the occupationally exposed and control groups, the effect of donor age, gender and smoking on micronucleus frequencies with and without centromeres was investigated. This study was performed within the framework of the Programme of Scientific Support to the Protection of Workers in the Area of Health of the Services of the Prime Minister Science Policy Office of the Belgian Government.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects
The population under study, exposed occupationally to ionizing radiation, comprised 71 individuals, 35 males and 36 females, working as doctors, nurses or technicians in the Departments of Radiology, Radiotherapy, Nuclear Medicine, Cardiology, Urology and Gastroenterology of the University Hospital Ghent. Concerning Cardiology and the other internal medicine departments staff members dealing with interventional radiology procedures especially were included. These medical workers are known to receive the highest doses of X-ray exposure. The control group, age-matched to the population under study, comprised 60 individuals, 23 males and 37 females, not exposed occupationally, which was confirmed by their film badge readings. This control group consisted of doctors and nurses working in the Department of Pediatrics and the Burns Unit of the hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all donors. Hospital workers preparing chemotherapeutic drugs were excluded from the study. Preceding blood collection on the occasion of a regular occupational medical examination, the volunteers were asked to fill in a questionnaire. Gender, date of birth, smoking habit, work-related exposure to hazardous agents, previous exposure to diagnostic X-rays as a patient, nuclear medical examination and use of therapeutic drugs were registered. None of the studied subjects received chemotherapeutic drugs. The blood samples were coded in the Occupational Medicine Service. Processing of the samples for the exposed and control groups and scoring were performed blind and concurrently in the laboratory. At the end of the study the data from the questionnaire and the radiation burden records were linked to the code number by the Occupational Medicine Service for data analysis.

Micronucleus centromere assay
Heparinized blood samples were drawn by venipuncture from medical workers. The same day as blood sampling, whole blood cultures containing 0.3 ml blood in RPMI 1640 medium with L-glutamine and 25 mM HEPES buffer (Gibco Laboratories, Gent, Belgium) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco) were initiated. Purified phytohaemagglutinin (PHA P, 30 µg/ml; Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO) was added as mitogen. Cytochalasin B (6 µg/ml, stock solution 2 mg/ml in dimethylsulphoxide; Sigma Chemical Co.) was added 42 h after culture initiation to block cytokinesis. After an incubation period of 70 h the cells were collected, treated with a hypotonic solution of 0.075 M KCl and fixed with a mixture of methanol/glacial acetic acid as described (Vral et al., 1994Go). After fixation the cells were dropped onto clean slides, allowed to dry and stored at –20°C before in situ hybridization with the centromeric DNA probe.

In situ hybridization was performed as described by Nederlof et al. (1990) with some modifications. A centromeric DNA probe, p82H (provided by A.R. Mitchell), which is a cloned alphoid sequence present in the centromeric region of all human chromosomes, was used (Mitchell et al., 1985Go). The probe was biotinylated (0.4 mM biotin-16-dUTP; Boehringer Mannheim) by standard nick translation. The slides, stored at –20°C, were pretreated with 4 µg/100 µl RNase (30 min at 37°C) and 7.5 µg/ml pepsin (5 min at 37°C; both Sigma), followed by post-fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde (UCB, Vel, Leuven, Belgium). A probe concentration of 4 ng/µl (in 50% deionized formamide/SSC; UCB) was added to the slides. Probe and target DNA were denaturated simultaneously (5 min at 80°C). Following overnight hybridization, immunofluorescence detection of the probe was performed by means of the tyramide signal amplification method (NEN Life Science). The tyramide signal amplification technology uses streptavidin/horseradish peroxidase to catalyze the deposition of biotin-labeled tyramides at the hybridization sites. These labeled tyramides were then visualized by means of streptavidin/fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) with significant enhancement of the signal. The slides were counterstained with propidium iodide. As validation of the centromere detection method, FISH treatment of metaphase spreads showed that the p82H probe hybridizes to the centromeres of all chromosomes. On slides of two individuals with high micronucleus yields FISH with a commercial centromeric probe for chromosome X (Vysis CEP X) was performed.

For the scoring of micronuclei (MN) and analysis for the presence of centromeres in the MN the preparations were examined under a Leitz fluorescence microscope with 400x magnification. For scoring a FITC/Texas Red (Chroma) filter set was used. The MN frequencies were scored according to the criteria proposed by Fenech (1993): the diameter of an MN is less than one third of the diameter of the macronucleus, it is non-refractile and is not linked to the macronucleus by a nucleoplasmic bridge. MN partly overlapping with the nucleus or with each other were also taken into account. MN were scored as centromere-positive when the brightness of the pancentromere probe signal in the micronucleus was comparable with the spots in the nucleus. One thousand binucleated (BN) cells were scored on two slides per individual. The results are expressed as the total number of MN per 1000 BN cells, the number of MN containing a centromere (MNCM+) per 1000 BN cells and the number of MN without a centromere (MNCM–) per 1000 BN cells.

Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of the comparison between groups of donors was carried out using the Wilcoxon test. To evaluate the effect of radiation exposure on the studied populations the MN data were corrected for the effect of age and gender using correction factors determined in the present work.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A direct comparison of the average values of MN, MNCM+ and MNCM– yields and other variables of the study (age and radiation burden over the last 10 years) between the exposed and the control populations is given in Table IGo. The higher MN frequency in the exposed population compared with the controls is clearly due to an elevated number of MNCM+. The difference in MNCM+ is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level applying the Wilcoxon test. As the populations are age-matched an effect of age can be ruled out. The same holds for a possible influence of smoking: about 60% of both populations were non-smokers. The exposed group comprised relatively more males. Taking into account the age–gender effect, discussed further below, increases the observed difference in MNCM+ between the exposed and the control group of workers: 14.40 versus 10.24 for a half-male/ half-female population 41.65 years old.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. . Direct comparison between the exposed and control populations of the average number of micronuclei (MN), number of MN containing a centromere (MNCM+) and number of MN without a centromere (MNCM–)
 
In an overview of the individual data, the number of MN, MNCM+ and MNCM– per 1000 BN cells versus donor age for the control and exposed populations is presented in Figure 1Go. The slopes of the linear regression lines for the relationship of MN, MNCM+ and MNCM– to age of the total population of 131 individuals were 0.52 (r = 0.42), 0.44 (r = 0.34) and 0.08 MN/year (r = 0.20), respectively. The results of this linear regression are also shown in Figure 1Go. The centromere-positive MN account for ~80% of the increase in the total number of MN with age. Two female radiological workers showed exceptionally high numbers of MN, more than 90% of which were centromere-positive. It is of interest to note that for these individuals a number of binucleated cells showed two or more micronuclei, resulting in a slight overdispersion compared with the Poisson distribution ({sigma}2 = 1.18 and 1.53) usually observed in MN frequency distributions (Thierens et al., 1995Go). A second analysis of blood samples drawn 6 months later confirmed these two high values: instead of 72 and 59 (first analysis), MN frequencies of 64 and 68 were found. FISH analysis with a centromeric probe for chromosome X of these two individuals showed 67 and 41 centromere-positive MN/1000 BN cells, respectively.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. . The number of micronuclei (MN), centromere-positive micronuclei (MNCM+) and centromere-negative micronuclei (MNCM–) per 1000 binucleated (BN) cells versus donor age. The data for the workers exposed to radiation are indicated by the black dots, the results for the control population by the open circles. The full lines are the results of linear regression analysis of the data for the whole population.

 
Sorting out the data according to donor gender shows MN and MNCM+ frequencies which are significantly (P < 0.01) higher for females than for males (Table IIGo). The difference between MNCM– frequencies is not significant. These conclusions were not altered when the two females with an exceptionally high MN yield were excluded from the statistical data analysis. The MN, MNCM+ and MNCM– yields for females were 1.43, 1.62 and 1.16 times greater, respectively, than for males. As the male and female populations were also age matched, the observed gender effect is not influenced by the age dependence of MN frequencies. An analysis of the MN– and MNCM+ frequencies versus age shows a stronger dependence for the female population than for the male population (MN, 0.58 versus 0.44 MN/year ; MNCM+, 0.54 versus 0.33 MN/year).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. . Comparison of the average number of micronuclei (MN), number of MN containing a centromere (MNCM+) and number of MN without a centromere (MNCM–) of the males and females of the whole population studied
 
The results of an investigation into the influence of smoking on MN, MNCM+ and MNCM– frequencies in the studied population are summarized in Table IIIGo. An increase in the MN and MNCM+ frequencies is observed for the smokers but this increase is not statistically significant. Correction of the micronucleus data for age and gender using correction factors deduced from Table IIGo and the linear regression represented in Figure 1Go does not alter this conclusion.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. . Results of the micronucleus centromere analysis of subpopulations of the medical workers classified in the smoker and non-smoker groups
 
To investigate whether the increased MN and MNCM+ frequencies in the exposed group are dose related, the data for this population were sorted into two groups according to the radiation burden over the last 10 years, using the personnel dosimetry records: a lower exposure class with an accumulated dose <5 mSv and a higher exposure class with an accumulated dose >5 mSv. Figure 2Go represents the results of this analysis after correction of the data for the exposed subpopulations for the observed age and gender effect to match these subpopulations to the control group. Figure 2Go shows that the observed increase in MN and MNCM+ frequencies in the exposed group compared with the controls is not dose related.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. . Comparison of the number of MN, MNCM+ and MNCM– per 1000 BN cells between the control population and the population of radiation workers classified into two groups according to the radiation burden over the last 10 years. The data for the control group are indicated by the white bars, those for the radiation workers with an accumulated dose <5 mSv by the hatched bars and those with doses >5 mSv by the black bars.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Detection of centromeres in the MN with a pancentromeric probe and by in situ hybridization allows distinction between the clastogenic and aneugenic actions of radiation (Kirsch-Volders et al., 1997Go). A direct comparison of the control population of medical workers with the exposed group shows an increase in MN and MNCM+ frequencies in the exposed population, the latter being statistically significant (P < 0.05). On the other hand, no increase in MNCM– frequencies was observed. The increase in MNCM+ cannot be attributed to the age distribution of males and females in the control group and the exposed population. Adjusting the MN data to a half-male/half-female population with a mean age of 41.65 years using the age dependence found for males and females slightly increased the observed difference in MNCM+. Other cytogenetic studies of hospital worker populations (Bigatti et al., 1988Go; Jha and Sharma, 1991Go; Barquinero et al., 1993Go) also showed a significant increase in structural chromosome type aberrations and numerical abnormalities in the exposed population compared with the controls. However, no correlation between the frequency of chromosomal aberrations and the dose received could be derived (Barquinero et al., 1993Go). An analysis of our MN data for the exposed group in two subpopulations of hospital workers according to a radiation burden over the last 10 years of more or less than 5 mSv also showed no dose-related effect on the observed increase in MN and MNCM+ (Figure 2Go).

Previous work (Vral et al., 1997Go) on micronucleus induction after in vitro low dose {gamma}-irradiation showed that radiation-induced MN are for the most part centromere-negative, reflecting the clastogenic action of radiation. After in vitro irradiation only a very small increase in centromere-positive MN with dose (5 MNCM+/1000 BN cells/Gy) was observed. Surprisingly, in the present study no difference in MNCM– between the exposed and control populations was noticed, while a significant increase in MNCM+ was observed. Our results indicate that, in contrast to the predominantly clastogenic action of acute exposure to ionizing radiation, the aneugenic properties of radiation may be important after long-term chronic low dose exposure. In a study of thyroid cancer patients by interphase FISH, Ramirez et al. (1997) reported that radioiodine treatment also had an aneugenic effect apart from the clastogenic effect. Furthermore, young and elderly patients showed the same increase in MNCM– frequency on radioiodine treatment, while the increase in MNCM+ was 2.3-fold higher in elderly patients. Thus, our observations are supported by data from thyroid cancer patients treated with radioactive iodine. An aneugenic activity of ionizing radiation after in vivo exposure was also reported by the group of Natarajan for mouse (Boei and Natarajan, 1995Go; Hande et al., 1996aGo,bGo) and victims of the Goiania accident (Natarajan et al., 1991Go).

The results of the present work show that the systematic increase in MN frequency with donor age is for the great part due to an increase in MNCM+, reflecting increased chromosome loss with age. Previous studies showed that the X-chromosome is almost completely responsible for spontaneously occurring chromosome loss (Hando et al., 1994Go; Richard et al., 1994Go; Surrallés et al., 1996Go; Catalan et al., 1998Go; Carere et al., 1999Go). The slopes of 0.58 and 0.44 MN/year, obtained from a linear regression analysis of the total number of MN for the female and the male populations, respectively, are close to the values of 0.52 and 0.31 MN/year reported by Fenech (1993). The observed overall increase of 0.52 MN/year is higher than the value of 0.19 MN/year reported by Ban et al. (1993) from a study of ~1000 atomic bomb survivors with ages between 42 and 84 years.

According to our data the MN frequencies are 1.4 times greater in females than in males. This observation is in agreement with the findings of Fenech (1998) in his large scale study of variables influencing baseline micronucleus frequency: MN frequencies are systematically larger in females with a factor increasing from 1.2 to 1.6 with age. The centromere analysis performed in the present work shows that this gender effect can be attributed almost completely to a greater number of chromosome loss events in females as the number of centromere-positive MN is 60% higher in females than in males. The observed age and gender effects can be explained by preferential loss of the X-chromosome during aging, as demonstrated in previous studies (Hando et al., 1994Go; Richard et al., 1994Go; Carere et al., 1999Go). Furthermore, Zijno et al. (1996a,b) also reported an age-related increase in X-chromosome non-disjunction. Following Surrallés et al. (1996), the higher susceptibility of chromosome X to malsegregation in comparison with autosomes is due to a constitutive defect in the machinery involved in mitotic segregation of this chromosome. According to our data this effect is also reponsible for the very high MN yields found in two subjects of our study.

Although smokers show a slight increase in MN and MNCM+ frequencies, the observed differences between smokers and non-smokers are not statistically significant. This also holds after correction of the data for differences in age and gender. Concerning the effect of tobacco on micronucleus frequency, the data in the literature are contradictory. According to some authors (Au et al., 1991Go; Tomanin et al., 1991Go; Da Cruz et al., 1994Go; Holmen et al., 1995Go) micronucleus frequency is elevated in smokers. On the other hand, no significant effect of smoking habit on micronucleus frequency was observed in the large-scale studies of Migliore et al. (1991) and Ban et al. (1993). Less unambiguous are the conclusions of Fenech (1993) and Duffaud et al. (1997). In his review paper Fenech (1993) stated that MN frequency is influenced by the number of cigarettes per day but not dependent on the number of years smoking. According to Duffaud et al. (1997) tobacco consumption affects the micronucleated cell rate in healthy subjects but not in cancer patients.

In conclusion, our data show a significantly elevated number of centromere-positive MN in medical workers exposed to ionizing radiation. This observation points to the possible importance of aneugenic effects after chronic exposure to radiation. The high susceptibility of chromosome X to malsegregation is responsible for the very high MN yields found in two females. No significant influence of smoking on MN, MNCM+ and MNCM– frequencies was observed.


    Acknowledgments
 
Special thanks are expressed to Mrs I.Meirlaen for preparation and scoring of the numerous slides. Furthermore we wish to thank Dr Mispelon, Dr Proot and Mrs Cuypers of the Service for Occupational Medicine IDEWE of the University Hospital Ghent for their collaboration. This work was supported by the Programme of Scientific Support to the Protection of Workers in the Area of Health of the Prime Ministers Office of the Belgian Government–Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affaires.


    Notes
 
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +32 92646643; Fax: +32 92646699; Email: hubert.thierens{at}rug.ac.be Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

    Aoyama,T. (1989) Radiation risk of Japanese and Chinese low dose repeatedly irradiated population. J. Univ. Occup. Environ. Health, 11, 432–442.

    Au,W., Walker,D., Ward,J.B., Whorton,E., Lagator,M.S. and Singh,V. (1991) Factors contributing to chromosome damage in lymphocytes of cigarettes smokers. Mutat. Res., 260, 137–144.

    Ban,S., Cologne,J.B., Fujita,S. and Awa,A.A. (1993) Radiosensitivity of atomic bomb survivors as determined with a micronucleus assay. Radiat. Res., 134, 170–178.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Barquinero,J.F., Barrios,L., Caballin,M.R., Miro,R., Ribas,M., Subias,A. and Egozcue,J. (1993) Cytogenetic analysis of lymphocytes from hospital workers occupationally exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation. Mutat. Res., 286, 275–279.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Bigatti,P., Lamberti,L., Ardito,G. and Armellino,F. (1988) Cytogenetic monitoring of hospital workers exposed to low-level ionizing radiation. Mutat. Res., 204, 343–347.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Boei,J.J.W.A. and Natarajan,A.T. (1995) Detection of chromosome malsegregation to the daughter nuclei in cytokinesis-blocked transgenic mouse splenocytes. Chromosome Res., 3, 45–53.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Carere,A., Antoccia,A., Cimini,D., Crebelli,R., Degrassi,F., Leopardi,P., Marcon,F., Sgura,A., Tanzarella,C. and Zijno,A. (1999) Analysis of chromosome loss and non-disjunction in cytokinesis-blocked lymphocytes of 24 male subjects. Mutagenesis, 14, 491–496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Catalán,J., Autio,K., Kuosma,E. and Norppa,H. (1998) Age-dependent inclusion of sex chromosomes in lymphocyte micronuclei in man. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 63, 1464–1472.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Da Cruz,A.D., McArthur,A.G., Silva,C.C., Curado,M.P. and Glickman,B.W. (1994) Human micronucleus counts are correlated with age, smoking and cesium-137 dose in the Goiana (Brazil) radiological accident. Mutat. Res., 313, 57–68.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Duffaud,F., Orsière,T., Villani,P., Pelissier,A.L., Volot,F., Favre,R. and Botta,A. (1997) Comparison between micronucleated lymphocyte rates observed in healthy subjects and cancer patients. Mutagenesis, 12, 227–231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Fenech,M. (1993) The cytokinesis-block micronucleus technique: a detailed description of the method and its application to genotoxicity studies in human populations. Mutat. Res., 285, 35–44.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Fenech,M. (1998) Important variables that influence base-line micronucleus frequency in cytokinesis-blocked lymphocytes—a biomarker for DNA damage in human populations. Mutat. Res., 404, 155–165.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Fenech,M. and Morley,A.A. (1985) Measurement of micronuclei in human lymphocytes. Mutat. Res., 147, 29–36.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Hande,M.P., Boei,J.J., Granath,F. and Natarajan,A.T. (1996a) Induction and persistence of cytogenetic damage in mouse splenocytes following whole-body X-irradiation analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. I. Dicentrics and translocations. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 69, 437–446.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Hande,M.P., Boei,J.J. and Natarajan,A.T. (1996b) Induction and persistence of cytogenetic damage in mouse splenocytes following whole-body X-irradiation analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. II. Micronuclei. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 70, 375–383.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Hando,J.C., Nath,J. and Tucker,J.D. (1994) Sex chromosomes, micronuclei and aging in women. Chromosoma, 103, 186–192.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Holmen,A., Karlsson,A., Bratt,I. and Hogstedt,B. (1995) Increased frequencies of micronuclei in T lymphocytes of smokers. Mutat. Res., 334, 205–208.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Jha,A.N. and Sharma,T. (1991) Enhanced frequency of chromosome aberrations in workers occupationally exposed to diagnostic X-rays. Mutat. Res., 260, 343–348.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Kirsch-Volders,M., Elhajouji,A., Cundari,E. and Van Hummelen,P. (1997) The in vitro micronucleus test: a multi-endpoint assay to detect simultaneously mitotic delay, apoptosis, chromosome breakage, chromosome loss and non-disjunction. Mutat. Res., 392, 19–30.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Migliore,L., Parrini,M., Sbrana,I., Biagini,C., Battaglia,A. and Loprieno,N. (1991) Micronucleated lymphocytes in people occupationally exposed to potential environmental contaminants: the age effect. Mutat. Res., 256, 13–19.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Mitchell,A.R., Gosden,J.R. and Miller,D.A. (1985) A cloned sequence p82H of the alphoid repeated DNA family found at the centromeres of all human chromosomes. Chromosoma, 92, 369–377.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Natarajan,A.T., Vyas,R.C., Wiegant,K. and Curado,M.P. (1991) A cytogenetic follow-up study of the victims of a radiation accident in Goiania (Brazil). Mutat. Res., 247, 103–111.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Nederlof,P.M., Van der Flier,S., Viegant,J., Raap,A.K., Tanke,H.J., Ploem,J.S. and Van der Ploeg,M. (1990) Multiple fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytometry, 11, 126–131.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Ramirez,M.J., Surrales,J., Galofré,P., Creus,A. and Marcos,R. (1997) Radioactive iodine induces clastogenic and age-dependent aneugenic effects in lymphocytes of thyroid cancer patients as revealed by interphase FISH. Mutagenesis, 12, 449–455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Richard,F., Muleris,M. and Dutrillaux,B. (1994) The frequency of micronuclei with X-chromosome increases with age in human females. Mutat. Res., 316, 1–7.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Smith,P.G. and Doll,R. (1981) Mortality from cancer and other causes among British radiologists. Br. J. Radiol., 54, 187–194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Streffer,C., Muller,W.U., Kryscio,A. and Bökker,W. (1998) Micronuclei—biological indicator for retrospective dosimetry after exposure to ionizing radiation. Mutat. Res., 404, 101–105.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Surrallés,J., Jeppesen,P., Morrison,H. and Natarajan,A.T. (1996) Analysis of loss of inactive X-chromosomes in interphase cells. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 59, 151–154.

    Thierens,H., Vral,A., Van Eijkeren,M., Speleman,F. and De Ridder,L. (1995) Micronucleus induction in peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients under radiotherapy treatment for cervical cancer or Hodgkin's disease. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 67, 529–539.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Thierens,H., Vral,A., De Ridder,L., Touil,N., Kirsch-Volders,M., Lambert,V. and Laurent,C. (1999) Interlaboratory comparison of cytogenetic endpoints for the biomonitoring of radiological workers. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 75, 23–34.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Tomanin,K., Ballarin,C., Nardini,B., Mastrangelo,G. and Sarto,F. (1991) Influence of smoking habits on the frequency of micronuclei in human lymphocytes by the cytokinesis block method. Mutagenesis, 6, 123–126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Vral,A., Verhaegen,F., Thierens,H. and De Ridder,L. (1994) The in vitro micronucleus assay: a detailed description of an improved slide preparation technique for the automated detection of micronuclei in human lymphocytes. Mutagenesis, 9, 439–443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Vral,A., Thierens,H. and De Ridder,L. (1997) In vitro micronucleus-centromere assay to detect radiation-damage induced by low doses in human lymphocytes. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 71, 61–68.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Wang,J., Boice,J.D. and Li,B. (1988) Cancer among medical diagnostic workers in China. J. Natl Cancer. Inst., 80, 344–350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Zijno,A., Leopardi,P., Marcon,F. and Crebelli,R. (1996a) Sex chromosome loss and non-disjunction in women: analysis of chromosomal segregation in binucleated lymphocytes. Chromosoma, 104, 461–467.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Zijno,A., Leopardi,P., Marcon,F. and Crebelli,R. (1996b) Analysis of chromosome segregation by means of fluorescence in situ hybridization: application to cytokinesis-blocked human lymphocytes. Mutat. Res., 372, 211–219.[Web of Science][Medline]

Received on October 18, 1999; accepted on December 22, 1999.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
L. Kapka, A. Baumgartner, E. Siwinska, L. E. Knudsen, D. Anderson, and D. Mielzynska
Environmental lead exposure increases micronuclei in children
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2007; 22(3): 201 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
L Popova, D Kishkilova, V. Hadjidekova, R. Hristova, P Atanasova, V. Hadjidekova, D Ziya, and V. Hadjidekov
Micronucleus test in buccal epithelium cells from patients subjected to panoramic radiography
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2007; 36(3): 168 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Krol, A. Lankoff, I. Buraczewska, E. Derezinska, and A. Wojcik
Radiation-induced micronucleus frequencies in female peripheral blood lymphocytes collected during the first and second half of the menstrual cycle
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2007; 123(4): 483 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
J. A. Bhalli, Q.M. Khan, M.A. Haq, A.M. Khalid, and A. Nasim
Cytogenetic analysis of Pakistani individuals occupationally exposed to pesticides in a pesticide production industry
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2006; 21(2): 143 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
H. Thierens, K. De Ruyck, A. Vral, V. de Gelder, C. A. Whitehouse, E. J. Tawn, and I. Boesman
Cytogenetic biodosimetry of an accidental exposure of a radiological worker using multiple assays
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 16, 2005; 113(4): 408 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
H. Norppa and G. C.-M. Falck
What do human micronuclei contain?
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2003; 18(3): 221 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
F. Maffei, S. Angelini, G. C. Forti, V. Lodi, F. S. Violante, S. Mattioli, and P. Hrelia
Micronuclei frequencies in hospital workers occupationally exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation: influence of smoking status and other factors
Mutagenesis, September 1, 2002; 17(5): 405 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
S. Pastor, S. Gutierrez, A. Creus, N. Xamena, S. Piperakis, and R. Marcos
Cytogenetic analysis of Greek farmers using the micronucleus assay in peripheral lymphocytes and buccal cells
Mutagenesis, November 1, 2001; 16(6): 539 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
M.-H. Tsai, J.-S. Hwang, K.-C. Chen, Y.-P. Lin, W. A. Hsieh, and W. P. Chang
Dynamics of changes in micronucleus frequencies in subjects post cessation of chronic low-dose radiation exposure
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2001; 16(3): 251 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thierens, H.
Right arrow Articles by De Ridder, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thierens, H.
Right arrow Articles by De Ridder, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?