Skip Navigation

Mutagenesis 2004 19(6):445-451; doi:10.1093/mutage/geh055
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horn, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Vargas, V. M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horn, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Vargas, V. M. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Mutagenesis vol. 19 no. 6 © UK Environmental Mutagen Society 2004; all rights reserved.

Determination of sediment mutagenicity and cytotoxicity in an area subjected to petrochemical contamination

Rubem Cesar Horn1,–3, Jocelita Aparecida Vaz Rocha2 and Vera Maria Ferrão Vargas1,2

1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves 9500, prédio 43422, caixa postal 15007, 91540–000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil and 2Programa de Pesquisas Ambientais, Divisão de Biologia, Fundação Estadual de Proteção Ambiental Henrique Luis Roessler, Avenida Dr Salvador França, 1707, CEP 90690-000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study is an evaluation of the mutagenic and cytotoxic activity of sediments in Bom Jardim stream, one of the tributaries of the Caí River basin, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. This stream receives an indirect contribution of treated effluent from a petrochemical plant. The Salmonella/microsome assay, a microsuspension method, was used to evaluate moderately polar extracts of sediment samples at three points along the stream. The grain size analysis showed a lower mean content of fine particles in the principle face (front) of the complex, and this was also the sampling point with the lowest percentage of extracted organics. Low mutagenic activity was observed at the different sites studied, ranging from 3.3 to 8.3%; cytotoxic activity was more important in this area, ranging from 20 to 40%, adding up the results of assays in the presence and absence of external metabolism. In assays without S9mix there were more frequent mutagenic and cytotoxic responses, with frameshift mutations being the most frequent. The results also showed that there was a gradual, seasonal distribution of the responses as the stream mouth is reached, the most compromised points being in front of and downstream of the complex. Mutagenic and cytotoxic activity in sediment samples has proved important to determine environmental quality, despite the complexity of the chemical composition of the environmental matrix. Furthermore, use of the Salmonella assay to monitor mutagenesis and cytotoxicity helped identify the presence of pollutants. This assay is an important tool, aimed mainly at actions to preserve the genetic heritage of the fauna and flora affected by human activity and to improve environmental quality.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Compounds for environmental or individual use, such as pesticides, agricultural inputs, food additives, pharmaceuticals and chemotherapeutic agents, as well as a complex samples resulting from the sum of natural and human contributions, have been diagnosed as presenting toxic properties that induce genetic damage. The levels of exposure to these agents are generally low and long-lasting, with a possibility of bioaccumulation and biotransformation, putting the integrity of the environment and human health at risk (Vargas et al., 2001aGo). Chemical contamination may also result in a population reduction due to the effects of somatic and heritable mutations, as well as to non-genetic toxicity, speeding up stochastic processes in small populations due to the increased frequency of mutations and reducing the fitness of these individuals (Bickham et al., 2000Go).

A large number of studies, using different approaches, of interstitial surface waters and sediments have verified contamination of these sources with complex mixtures of toxic substances that could induce genetic damage (Loper, 1980Go; Meier, 1988Go; Valent, 1990Go; Stahl, 1991Go; Houk, 1992Go; Vargas et al., 1993Go, 2001bGo; Claxton et al., 1998Go). Generally, the contaminants tend to be more associated with the fine portion (silt or clay) than with the larger sediments (sand or gravel). The fine sediments derive partly from suspended particles that adsorb different contaminants in the water column until they are deposited at the bottom. Once they have been deposited, they are overlaid by new layers of sediments and the water column thus loses the original connection to the sources of contaminants (USEPA, 1994Go). The distribution of chemical contaminants in the sediments depends not only on localized or non-point sources, but also on natural processes and human activities that redistribute the contaminated sediments. Sediment quality in deposition areas may reflect the history of pollution events that occurred over decades or recently in the surface layer (USEPA, 1994Go). A significant portion of these pollutants is deposited in the sediment by adsorption, flocculation and sedimentation, constituting potential sources of chemical contamination of the water column (Bonnet et al., 2000Go).

It is very difficult to identify specific chemicals as a genotoxic response in environmental samples because few compounds are present at high concentrations. Rarely, the more abundant substances cause genotoxic activity (Stahl, 1991Go). Often the action cannot be attributed to specific compounds in the mixture but to a set of chemical properties and interactions of the sample as a whole (McGeorge et al., 1983Go; Vargas, 1992Go).

This study presents an evaluation of the sediment of Bom Jardim stream, one of the contributors to the Caí River basin in Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brazil, which receives an indirect contribution of treated effluents from a petrochemical industry complex. This area was evaluated previously using samples of surface water in a Salmonella/microsome assay and the presence of base pair substitution and frameshift mutagens was diagnosed (Vargas et al., 1988Go, 1993Go, 1995Go; FEPAM, 1997Go). Sediment evaluation along the stream supplies a diagnosis of the ecotoxicological impact on the area because certain groups of compounds with toxic and genotoxic properties are deposited over time.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chemical substances
The mutagenic substances used in this study were: sodium azide (AZS) (CAS no. 26628-22-8) and dichloromethane (DCM) (CAS no. 75-09-2) from Merck, Brazil; 2-aminofluorene (2AF) (CAS no. 153-78-6) and 1-nitroquinoline-4-oxide (4NQO) (CAS no. 56-57-5), glucose 6-phosphate (G6P) and NADP from Sigma Chemical Co. (St Louis, MO); dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) (CAS no. 67-68-5) from Riedel and Rödel. A metabolic activaton fraction (S9 mix), prepared from Sprague–Dawley rat livers pretreated with Aroclor 1254, was purchased from Molecular Toxicology Inc. (Boone, NC).

Study areas
Five samplings were performed at three points in Bom Jardim stream, which drains the effluent disposal area of a petrochemical complex, in 1999 (summer, spring, autumn and winter) and 2000 (summer). The surface sediment samples were collected and stored in a cold chamber (4°C), in the dark until chemical extraction was performed.

The sampling sites are shown in Figure 1: point BJn (6697480 N; 455403 E), one of the ponds that form Bom Jardim stream, located upstream of the area influenced by the deposition of industrial effluents; point BJ002 (6699153.0 N; 462318.4 E), located in front of the area where the treated liquid effluents are sprayed; point BJ000 (6699095.5N; 464596.0 E), at the mouth of Bom Jardim stream close to the Caí River, which receives drainage water from the final disposal areas of the liquid effluent, from the sludge farm and integrated industrial waste treatment system.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.. Location of the sampling points. RS, Rio Grande do Sul state; BJn, BJ002 and BJ000, sampling points.

 
Wet extraction of sediments
The extraction of organic compounds was adapted from White et al. (1998)Go. The samples were homogenized and a 50 g aliquot was removed. Extraction was performed using ultrasound (4 x 3 min cycles), using the pesticide grade solvent dichloromethane (100 ml). The extracts obtained were prefiltered through glass wool and sodium sulfate anhydride and filtered by column chromatography (clean-up performed using sodium sulfate anhydride and Celite 545). Later the sample was concentrated to a volume of ~16 ml using a rotary evaporator (at 40°C) and the mass of extracted organic matter was determined.

Grain size analysis
Grain size analysis used the Wentworth/Krumbein method (Wentworth, 1922Go; Krumbein, 1934Go) and that of Stokes (1851)Go. They were classified as gravels, sands, silt and clay. All analyses were performed in the Sedimentology Laboratory of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.

Mutagenicity and cytotoxicity evaluation assays
The Salmonella/microsome microsuspension method assay, also called the Kado test (Kado et al., 1986Go), was used with tester strains TA97a, TA98, TA100 and TA1535 (Gatehouse et al., 1994Go). The bacterial culture (1–2 x 1010 cells/ml) was preincubated with an aliquot of the extract of the sediment sample for 90 min at 37°C. The mixture was later solidified by means of a surface agar solution containing traces of histidine and biotin (Maron and Ames, 1983Go). The samples were evaluated at least in duplicate in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system, S9 mix. In all assays, negative (100 µl of buffer) and positive (5 µg/plate sodium azide, 5 µg/plate 2-aminofluorene or 0.5 µg/plate 1-nitroquinoline-4-oxide) controls were added according to the strain and treatment utilized, accompanied by a cellular viability assay (Maron and Ames, 1983Go; Vargas et al., 1988Go). For the viability and cytotoxicity assays the bacterial culture (1–2 x 1010 cells/ml) was preincubated with an aliquot of the extract of the sediment sample for 90 min at 37°C. Then the mixture was diluted to 1–2 x 102 cells/ml with phosphate buffer and plated in a rich nutritive/complete medium. In the cytotoxicity assay (cell viability test) the samples were considered cytotoxic when the percentage survival in the sample was <60% of that observed in the negative control (Vargas et al., 1993Go). The plates for the mutagenicity and cytotoxicity assays were incubated for 72 h at 37°C in a bacteriological chamber.

Statistical analysis
The sample was considered positive when the induced mutation values reached double the mutagenic activity observed in the negative control, ANOVA test significant (P ≤ 0.05) between the doses and when the elevation in the dose–responses curves was evaluated by the SALMONEL program (Myers et al., 1991Go) was significant. The sample was considered indicative of mutagenicity when it presented twice the spontaneous mutation or ANOVA and significant dose–response relation.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The mutagenic activities observed in the different sampling periods are compared in Figures 25, for assays in the absence (Figures 2 and 4) and presence of exogenous metabolism (Figures 3 and 5), both for mutagenic responses of the frameshift error type (Figures 2 and 3) and base pair substitutions (Figures 4 and 5).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.. Mutagenic evaluation by microsuspension assay with frameshift strains (TA98 and TA97a) in the absence of metabolic activation. (a) Dose per plate (µg); (b) mutagenic index = no. of revertants per plate of the sample/negative control revertants per plate (c) no. of revertants/µg, derived using Salmonel statistical software. Spontaneous revertants: TA98, 38 ± 10.8; TA97a, 146 ± 54.9. The base of the graph indicates regression analysis in the linear portion of the dose–response curve (F test significance): white, non-significant; gray, P ≤ 0.5; black, P ≤ 0.1. The colors of the columns represent the final response: white, non-mutagenic; gray, indicative; black, positive.

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.. Mutagenic evaluation by microsuspension assay with frameshift strains (TA98 and TA97a) in the presence of metabolic activation. (a) Dose per plate (µg); (b) mutagenic index = no. of revertants per plate of the sample/negative control revertants per plate; (c) no. of revertants/µg, derived using Salmonel statistical software. Spontaneous revertants: TA98, 33 ± 13.7; TA97a, 249 ± 142.9; The base of the graph indicates regression analysis in the linear portion of the dose–response curve (F test significance): white, non-significant; gray, P ≤ 0.5 and black, P ≤ 0.1. The colors of the columns represent the final response: white, non-mutagenic; gray, indicative; black, positive.

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.. Mutagenic evaluation by microsuspension assay with substitution base pair strains (TA100 and TA 1535) in the absence of metabolic activation. (a) Dose per plate (µg); (b) mutagenic index = no. of revertants per plate of the sample/negative control revertants per plate; (c) no. of revertants/µg, derived using Salmonel statistical software. Spontaneous revertants: TA100, 190 ± 73.4; TA1535, 21 ± 9.1. The base of the graph indicates regression analysis in the linear portion of the dose–response curve (F test significance): white, non-significant; gray, P ≤ 0.5; black, P ≤ 0.1. The colors of the columns represent the final response: white, non-mutagenic; gray, indicative; black, positive.

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.. Mutagenic evaluation by microsuspension assay with substitution base pair strains (TA1000 and TA1535) in the presence of metabolic activation. (a) Dose per plate (µg); (b) mutagenic index = no. of revertants per plate of the sample/negative control revertants per plate; (c) no. of revertants/µg, derived using Salmonel statistical software. Spontaneous revertants: TA100, 223 ± 50.0; TA1535, 19 ± 6.3. The base of the graph indicates regression analysis in the linear portion of the dose–response curve (F test significance): white, non-significant; gray, P ≤ 0.5; black, P ≤ 0.1. The colors of the columns represent the final response: white, non-mutagenic; gray, indicative; black, positive.

 
Results indicating direct mutagenic activity of the frameshift error type were observed in the assays with strain TA98 (Figure 2) at BJ000 in sampling II and with strain TA97a at BJ000 in samplings II and III. In assays in the presence of exogenous S9 mix (Figure 3), indicative mutagenic activity was observed in at least one sampling for all points evaluated [BJn (sampling IV), BJ002 (sampling I) and BJ000 (sampling III)] in strain TA98. No mutagenic activity was observed for strain TA97a.

Mutagenic activity indicative of base pair substitutions was observed at least once at all sampling points and was diagnosed in TA100 at BJn (sampling I) and BJ000 (sampling I) and in TA1535 at BJ0002 (sampling II) in direct assays (Figure 4). In the presence of S9mix (Figure 5) this type of activity was observed only for assays with strain TA1535 at BJn (sampling V).

Generally, a higher frequency of frameshift mutations can be observed (10%) as compared with base pair substitutions (6.8%) in the responses observed when summing the results for all strains used. The most frequent responses were detected at sampling station BJ000 (8.4%). The seasonal distribution showed a decrease in mutagenic activity throughout the sampling period (Figure 6) and higher activity in the absence of external metabolism (10% without and 6.78% with S9 mix). A change in the type of action of the mutagenic compounds should be noted. More direct activity occurred in the first summer and autumn, while during the other seasons indirect compound activity was seen.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.. Percentage of positive responses for mutagenic activity and its seasonal distribution.

 
Cytotoxic activity was monitored in all assays and proved to be the most significant parameter in the area studied. Analyzing the data according to season of the year, there was more activity in summer, and it was absent in spring (Figure 7). A gradient of responses, summer > winter > autumn > spring, may be observed. The most affected sampling point was BJ000, presenting a higher percentage of cytotoxic responses. In addition, more activity was observed in the direct assays, i.e. without external metabolism, both with respect to occurrence at sampling points and seasonality.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.. Percentage of positive responses for cytotoxic activity (%) and its seasonal distribution. The percentage of responses was calculated based on all assays performed and the number of cytotoxic responses. In spring there was no cytotoxicity. The results represent mean activity between treatments with and without metabolic activation.

 
The results of the grain size analysis (Figure 8A) showed that point BJ002 presented a higher sand content (72.65%) as compared with the other sampling points (BJn, 57.38%; BJ000, 61.53%). This result could possibly account for the lower concentration of active compounds, presenting on average two times less organic material extracted as compared with points BJn and BJ000 (Figure 8B).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.. Results of sediment analyses as to grain size (A) and moderately polar organic material extracted from the samples (B). The data are presented as percentages of the total material obtained.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of the grain size analysis show the importance of the matrix that forms the sediment in the percentage of organic compounds adsorbed. Sediments with a lower content of clays and silts, which are more porous materials, showed a lower adsorption of compounds, evidenced by low values of extracted organic mass (Figure 8A). Therefore, physical aspects of the sediment samples are relevant in the diagnosis of contamination of this environmental compartment, because chemical compounds are mainly associated with the fine fraction of sediments (clays and silts) (USEPA, 1994Go). Further, contaminated sediments may be directly toxic to aquatic life or could be a source of contaminants for bioaccumulation in the food chain (USEPA, 2000Go).

The results show that there is mutagenic and cytotoxic activity dispersed throughout the area of study. The main activity in this region is petrochemical processing and the points in front of and downstream from the area where the greatest deposition of treated effluents occurs presented the greatest degradation of environmental quality (BJ002 and BJ000) defined by the presence of mutagenic and cytotoxic activity. The results observed at the mouth of the stream (BJ000) agree with previous studies on surface water (Vargas et al., 1993Go; FEPAM, 1997Go), being the site of highest incidence of positive responses in the Caí River basin. They also agree with results observed in water samples collected at the same sites and on the same collection dates, and evaluated by the classical Salmonella/microsome test. In this associated study (Cardozo et al., 2001Go; Vargas et al., 2003Go) a higher percentage of mutagenic samples was observed at the two sites with the greatest environmental degradation.

In the present study activity indicating mutagenicity was also observed at the reference point upstream of the complex area (BJn). This activity may be related to atmospheric pollution generated by the complex, since the area investigated is in the main pollutant dispersion plume for this area (Ducatti et al., 2001Go). Chemical extraction of the samples using a specific solvent enables characterization of some types of contaminants, as in a study by Grifoll et al. (1990)Go, which related the mutagenic activity in sediments extracted with moderately polar solvents, containing compounds such as phthalic esters, aromatic amines and ketones, and extracted with polar solvents, containing substances such as nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, azaarenes and aromatic anhydrides. Fernandez et al. (1992)Go showed that the sediments extracted using solvents that were not highly polar or non-polar presented a higher number of compounds such as chlorinated pesticides and hepta and octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins. These authors also showed that the origin of these compounds was oxygenation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons during combustion and/or photooxidation of fossil materials and wood. He also revealed that other compounds with mutagenic activity extracted by moderately polar solvents belong to the nitroarenes group and are due to fuel combustion in internal combustion engines. They are more active in the presence of external metabolic activation.

The mutagenic activity observed in this study did not have high indices, varying from 0.28 to 2.29 times the values observed in the negative control, with responses that are only indicative of mutagenicity. A linear regression analysis (Myers et al., 1991Go) allowed the estimation of values of 1.38 revertants/µg extract.

According to Vargas et al. (1995)Go, different chemical extraction processes do not preserve volatile compounds present in the samples. In a study of water samples from the Caí River, an area under petrochemical influence, using a specific process to extract volatile compounds, they showed that these substances could be the main agents responsible for the mutagenic activity observed. Therefore, the low mutagenic activity observed in the sediments in this area may be related to this factor. Despite this, differences could be observed in mutagenic activity between the upstream point and the stream mouth, with activity at the latter being more frequent in assays with metabolic activation. It should also be mentioned that different types of mutagenesis were found, indicating different contributions in the areas sampled.

Cytotoxicity proved to be the main marker of pollution for sediment samples in the area, showing a rising gradient of responses as the industrial complex was approached and downstream of the complex. This response was higher during those periods of the year with high and low mean temperatures and was lower or absent when the weather was mild. Following up these analyses with chronic toxicity assays has supplied responses that are complementary to this study, showing evidence of this action of sediment samples from the same sites and collection dates in Daphnia magna (Felden et al., 2002Go).

Thus, it is clear that the stream is undergoing ecotoxicological degradation as the first area of impact of the petrochemical complex on the environment. Mutagenic and cytotoxic activity in sediment samples proved an important tool to determine the degradation of environmental quality. The chemical composition of this environmental matrix is complex and not fully understood, allowing multiple interactions between the biotic and abiotic components, generating synergistic, antagonistic and/or toxic effects. The Salmonella/microsome assay monitoring data at the molecular level served as a bioindicator, helping to determine impact. This property of the assay and its use in areas under environmental threat allows diagnosis of the presence of low concentrations of pollutants that cause mutagenesis and/or cytotoxicity, serving as a warning of environmental contamination and preventing damage to the genetic heritage of the fauna and flora affected by human activity.


    Acknowledgments
 
This research was supported by FEPAM, CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), PADCT/FINEP 77.97.1116.00 (Programa de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento científico e Tecnológico/Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos) and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.


    Notes
 
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Fundação Estadual de Proteção Ambiental Henrique Luis Roessler, Avenida Dr Salvador França, 1707,CEP 90690-000 Porto Alegre-RS, Brasil. Tel: +55 51 3334 6765; Fax: +55 51 334 6765; Email: rubemch{at}fepam.rs.gov.br


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

    Bickham,J.W., Sandhu,S., Hebert,P.D.N., Chikhi,L. and Athwal,R. (2000) Effects of chemical contaminants on genetic diversity in natural populations: implications for biomonitoring and ecotoxicology. Mutat. Res., 463, 33–35.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Bonnet,C., Babut,M., Férard,J.F., Martel,L. and Garric,J. (2000) Assessing the potential toxicity of resuspended sediment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 19, 1290–1296.[CrossRef]

    Cardozo,T., Ducatti,A. and Vargas,V.M.F. (2001) Análise da atividade mutagênica de águas do arroio Bom Jardim em área de Influência Petroquímica no RS. In Anais do 5° Congresso de Ecologia do Brasil, Porto Alegre, Novembro, p. 386.

    Claxton,L., Houk,V.S. and Hughes,T.J. (1998) Genotoxicity of industrial wastes and effluents. Mutat. Res., 410, 237–243.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Ducatti,A., Mitelstaedt,A.B., Bringhenti,L. and Vargas,V.M.F. (2001) Mutagenicity of airborne particulate samples in area of influence the petrochemical complex, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Mutat. Res., 483, S79.

    Felden,I.R., Terra,N.R. and Nunes,E.A. (2002) Exposição de D. magna para avaliação do sedimento do Arroio Bom Jardim entre junho 2001 e março 2002. In 6° Encontro de Biólogos do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil, p. 14.

    FEPAM (1997) Métodos Analíticos de Avaliação Toxicológica da Qualidade Ambiental. Relatório de Pesquisa (Relatório Final—Subprojeto I).

    Fernández,P., Grifoll,M., Solannas,A.M., Bayona,J.M. and Albagés,J. (1992) Bioassay—direct chemical analysis of genotoxic components in coastal sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol., 26, 817–829.[CrossRef]

    Gatehouse,D., Harworth,S., Cebula,T., Gocke,E., Kier,L., Matsushima,T., Melcion,C., Nohmi,T., Ohta,T., Venitt,S. and Zeiger,E. (1994) Recommendations for the performance of bacterial mutation assays. Mutat. Res., 312, 217–233.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Grifoll,M., Solanas,A.M. and Bayona,J.M. (1990) Characterization of genotoxic components in sediments by mass spectrometric techniques combined with Salmonella/microsome test. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 19, 175–184.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Houk,V.S. (1992) The genotoxicity of industrial wastes and effluents: a review. Health Effects Research Laboratory, USEPA. Mutat. Res., 277, 91–138.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Krumbein,W.C. (1934) Size frequency distribution of sediments. J. Sed. Petrol., 4, 65–77.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Kado,N.Y., Guirguis,N., Guirguis,C., Flessel,P., Chan,R.C., Chang,K. and Wesolowski,J.I. (1986) Mutagenicity of fine (<2.5 µM) airborne particles: diurnal variation in community air determined by a Salmonella micro preincubation (microsuspension) procedure. Environ. Mutagen., 8, 53–66.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Loper,J.C. (1980) Mutagenic effects of organic compounds in drinking water. Mutat. Res., 76, 241–268.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Maron,D.M. and Ames,B.N. (1983) Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat. Res., 113, 173–215.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    McGeorge,L.J., Loius,J.B., Atherholt,T.B. and McGarrit,G.J. (1983) Mutagenicity Analyses of Industrial Effluents: Background, Results to Date. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, NJ.

    Meier,J.R. (1988) Genotoxic activity of organic chemicals in drinking water. Mutat. Res., 198, 211–245.

    Myers,L.N., Adams,L., Kier,T.K., Rao,B., Shaw,B. and Williams,L. (1991) Microcomputer software for data management and statistical anlyses of the Ames/Salmonella test. In D. Krewski (ed.), Statistical Methods in Toxicological Research. Gordon and Breach, New York, NY.

    Stahl,R.G.,Jr (1991) The genetic toxicology of organic compounds in natural waters and wastewaters. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 22, 94–125.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Stokes,G.G. (1851) On the effect of the internal friction of fluids on the motion of pendulums. Trans. Camb. Philos. Soc., 9 (2), 8–106.

    USEPA (1994) Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediments (ARCS) Program, Assessment Guidance Document, EPA 905-B94-002. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

    USEPA (2000) Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates, 2nd Edn, EPA 600-R99–064. US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN.

    Valent,G.V. (1990) Avaliação da atividade mutagênica de extratos orgânicos de corpos d'água do Estado de São Paulo através de teste de Ames. PhD dissertation, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.

    Vargas,V.M.F. (1992) Avaliação de testes para triagem e diagnóstico de agentes genotóxicos ambientais. Tese de doutorado, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

    Vargas,V.M.F., Motta,V.E.P. and Henriques,J.A.P. (1988) Analysis of mutagenicity of waters under the influence petrochemical industrial complexes by the Ames test 4 (Salmonella/microsome). Rev. Bras. Genet., 11, 505–518.

    Vargas,V.M.F., Motta,V.E.P. and Henriques,J.A.P. (1993) Mutagenic activity detected by the Ames test in river water under the influence of petrochemical industries. Mutat. Res., 319, 31–45.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Vargas,V.M.F., Guidobono,R.R., Jordão,C. and Henriques,J.A.P. (1995) Use of two short-term tests to evaluate the genotoxicity of river water treated with different concentration/extraction procedures. Mutat. Res., 343, 31–52.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Vargas,V.M.F., Ducatti,A. and Horn,R.C. (2001a) Diagnóstico de mutagênese ambiental e sua aplicabilidade em ecotoxicologia. In Tucci,C.E.M. and Marques,D.M.L.M. (eds), Avaliação e Controle da Drenagem Urbana. ABRH, Porto Alegre, Vol. 2, p. 548.

    Vargas,V.M.F., Bresolin,S., Melo,A.C., Horn,R.C., Guidobono,R.R., Sá Ferreira,I.C. and Pestana,M.H.D. (2001b) Genotoxicity assessment in aquatic environments under the influence of heavy metals and organic contaminants. Mutat. Res., 490, 141–158.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Vargas,V.M.F., Sarmento,E.C., Rocha,J.A.V., Tagliari,K.C., Cardozo,T.R., Santos,C.A. and Horn,R.C. (2003) Atividade mutagênica como medida de qualidade em bacias hidrográficas sujeitas a diferentes contribuições antrópicas. Ecossistemas Aquáticos Costeiros Continentais, 1, 448–490.

    Wentworth,C.K. (1922) A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J. Geol., 30, 377–392.

    White,P.A., Rasmussen,B. and Blaise,C. (1998) Genotoxic substances in the St. Lawrence system II: extracts of fish and macroinvertebrates from the St. Lawrence and Saguenay rivers, Canada. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 17, 304–316.[CrossRef]

Received on April 26, 2004; revised on August 12, 2004; accepted on August 22, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horn, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Vargas, V. M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horn, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Vargas, V. M. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?