Mutagenesis Advance Access originally published online on February 6, 2007
Mutagenesis 2007 22(2):129-134; doi:10.1093/mutage/gel066
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison of the peripheral blood micronucleus test using flow cytometry in rat and mouse exposed to aneugens after single-dose applications
Safety Profiling and Assessment, Exploratory Development, Novartis Pharma AG, MUT-2881.5.44, CH4002 Basel, Switzerland 1Laboratory of Cell Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Detection of clastogenic compounds in the peripheral blood micronucleus test (MNT) in rats is a well-established methodology. However, the results obtained on the induction of micronuclei by aneugens in rat peripheral blood are controversial. Our aim was a comparative evaluation of the peripheral blood flow cytometry MNT in Wistar Han rat and CD1 mouse exposed to three aneugens (vinblastine, vincristine and colchicine) after single-dose applications. In addition, the same compounds were tested in the rat bone marrow MNT. The treatment with vinblastine (0.25, 0.5, 1, mg/kg), vincristine (0.025, 0.05, 0.1 mg/kg) or colchicine (0.7, 1, 1.3 mg/kg) induced no statistically significant increase in MN-PCEs (micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes or reticulocytes) in rat peripheral blood. In rat bone marrow, a clear statistically significant increase in MN-PCE was found with vincristine and vinblastine. However, colchicine showed a clear increase in MN-PCE frequency without reaching statistically significant level only at 1 mg/kg. The positive effect in the bone marrow MNT shows that the target organ was exposed to the appropriate concentration levels of the respective aneugens. In mouse, the peripheral blood flow cytometry analysis after the treatment with vinblastine, vincristine and colchicine showed clear statistically significant increase in MN-PCE with all three compounds. The experiments with splenectomized rats treated with vincristine and colchicine were performed and statistically significant increases in MN-PCE were found with 0.05, 0.1, 0.15 mg/kg of vincristine and 0.7 and 1 mg/kg of colchicine. Our results demonstrate that micronucleated cells induced by aneugens are removed from rat peripheral blood by the spleen due to the large size of micronuclei. Based on our data, it is concluded that the flow cytometry peripheral blood MNT after single-dose applications is an appropriate test system for evaluating the genotoxic effects of aneugens in mice. However, in rats peripheral blood MNT aneugen detection might require multiple-dose applications to overwhelm the spleen effect.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The bone marrow micronucleus test (MNT) is a standard assay used in genetic toxicology (1
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals
Male Wistar Han rats and CD1 mice 7 weeks old were purchased from Charles River Laboratory (Sulzfeld, Germany). Splenectomized rats 8 weeks old were purchased from Charles River Laboratory (L'Arbresle, France). The spleen was removed when the animals were 6 weeks old. The animals were acclimatized for 1 week before the start of the experiments. Food and water were available ad libitum. Twelve animals were used for each experiment, three animals for each dose group including negative controls.
Chemicals and reagents
Vincristine sulphate (CAS number: 2068-78-2), vinblastine sulphate (CAS number: 43-67-9) and colchicine (CAS number: 64-86-8) were purchased from SigmaAldrich (Buchs SG, Switzerland). Vehicle NaCl 0.9% was purchased from B. Braun Medical AG (Emmenbrücke, Switzerland). MicroFlow Rat and Mouse Micronucleus Analysis Kits were purchased from Litron (NY, USA). The kits contained solution A, methanol; solution B, heparin; solution C, washing buffer [Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS)]; solution D, RNase; solution E, anti-CD71 antibody; solution G, anti-platelet antibody (phycoerythrin); solution F, propidium iodide (PI); malaria biostandard blood samples and positive and negative control samples.
Treatment protocols
In all experiments, single treatments were performed. The compounds were dissolved in NaCl 0.9% and administered intraperitoneally (i.p). The dose range selection for the respective compounds was based on preliminary toxicity assessment. The rat peripheral blood sampling was performed at 24, 30, 48 and 72 h for vinblastine and vincristine experiments. In colchicine experiment, blood sampling was performed at 24, 30 and 48 h due to animal sacrifice for parallel bone marrow collection but at 24, 30, 48 and 72 h for splenectomized rat experiment. For the experiments, rat bone marrow and mouse peripheral blood samples were collected at 48 h.
Blood sample preparation
Peripheral blood samples were obtained for flow cytometric analysis using the MicroFlow Rat Micronucleus Analysis Kit (Litron) by following the three-colour staining protocol. Approximately, 120 µl of blood was collected from the tail vein of each animal into a tube containing 350 µl of heparin. Blood samples were maintained at room temperature for no more than 3 h before fixation. Samples were fixed in ultracold (-80°C) methanol. For the fixation, 180 µl of blood was added to a polypropylene centrifuge tube filled with 2 ml ultracold methanol, mixed and stored at -80°C until analysis. On the day of analysis, the fixed blood samples were removed from the -80°C freezer and tapped gently several times and 12 ml of an ice-cold solution C was added. The cells were isolated by centrifugation at approximately 600x g for 5 min. Cell pellets were stored at +4°C. Samples were shortly re-suspended by vortexing; 20 µl aliquots of fixed blood cells were added to tubes containing 80 µl of the staining solution (10 µl of the solution D and E, 5 µl of the solution G per millilitre of the solution C). The samples were kept for 30 min at 4°C and for 30 min at room temperature to ensure the complete degradation of the RNA. The samples were stored at 4°C until analysis. Directly before analysis, cells were diluted with 2 ml cold PI staining solution.
Flow cytometry analysis
Flow cytometry micronucleus test is based on an immunochemical reagent (anti-CD71fluorescein isothiocyanate) which differentially labels polychromatic and normochromatic erythrocytes, PI staining to detect micronucleus in poly- and normochromatic erythrocytes and PE antibody used to exclude platelet aggregates. Young PCEs or reticulocytes still have CD71 antigen on their surface; however, with the maturation process the amount of the CD71 antigen rapidly decreases. Staining of the erythrocytes with anti-CD71 antibodies allows the selection of the young PCEs containing CD71 antigen for further analysis by flow cytometry.
All flow cytometric analyses were carried out with a FACS Calibur flow cytometer tuned to 488-nm excitation. A total of 20 000 MN-PCEs were analysed per sample. Anti-CD71, anti-plateletPE and PI fluorescence signals were detected in the FL1, FL2 and FL3 channels, respectively. Erythrocytes infected with Plasmodium berghei, biological standard (purchased from Litron), were used to model micronucleus-containing cells and to set up and calibrate the instrument (12
,13
). The parasite-infected blood was stained in parallel with the test samples, so that adjustments to flow cytometer settings could be made. While analyzing a malaria-infected blood sample, photomultiplier tube voltages and laser power were adjusted to maximize resolution between cells with and without malaria parasites, and also between cells with single and multiple parasites.
Bone marrow sample preparation
For each rat, a disposable plastic tube (5 ml) is filled with 2 ml filtered 25 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)/fetal calf serum (FCS) mix, and a 2-ml plastic syringe with a disposable needle was prepared. Two glass slides coated with poly-L-lysine were used for each animal. The animals were killed by CO2 asphyxiation. Immediately after death, one femur was dissected and the content was drawn into a centrifuge tube with 2 ml of 25 mM EDTA/FCS mix. Samples are prepared according to the method described in the literature (14
,15
).
Removal of nucleated cells from bone marrow
Cellulose columns were prepared as follows: equal parts by weight of microcrystalline cellulose, Sigmacell type 50. For each animal, 400450 mg of the cellulose mixture was filled into a disposable plastic syringe without plunger. The syringe was sealed by placing an 8-µm disk filter membrane between the syringe tip and the attached needle. As soon as the cell suspension has entered the cellulose matrix, 1.5 ml HBSS (without phenol red) was applied to the column surface.
Cell separation
Eluates were loaded directly from the columns onto 35% Percoll solutions. These solutions were then centrifuged for 10 min at 2200 r.p.m. The pellet was taken up, washed with 10 ml HBSS (5 min, 2000 r.p.m.) and re-suspended in FCS with 50 mM EDTA. The cell number was determined by a Sysmex Cell Counter and diluted to approximately 58 x 106 cells/ml.
Cytocentrifugation to flatten cells
Cytocentrifugation was carried out in a Shandon Cytospin. An aliquot of the cell suspension (50100 µl) was loaded into the chamber. The cells were then pelleted onto slides coated with poly-L-lysine at 1400 r.p.m., high acceleration, for 7 min. Slides were left to dry at room temperature for at least 12 h before staining and then stained by May-Gruenwald/Giemsa solution.
Bone marrow slide analysis
The slides were analysed automatically using an image analysis system (ROBIAS image analyser). Following the scoring process, the MN-PCEs identified by the system were examined for possible artefacts. For each rat, two slides per animal were analysed. A total of 2000 PCEs per slide are analysed for micronuclei, i.e. 4000 PCEs per animal.
Data analysis
Mean and standard deviation for PCE% and MN-PCE% were calculated for each treatment group. The results of the MNT were evaluated according to the following criteria: a compound was classified as genotoxic in the rat MNT if it induced a statistically significant increase in micronucleus frequency above the control level. The statistical evaluation was performed with the SAS software package (SAS version 8.02). Levene's test for homogeneity of variances was performed on absolute deviations (16
). If variances were not significantly heterogeneous (17
), then a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed (18
). If the ANOVA detected significant differences between groups, a multiple comparison with the controls was performed with the Dunnett test (19
). If the variances were significantly heterogeneous, a non-parametric analysis was performed using the KruskalWallis test (20
). A multiple comparison with the control group was done using the Dunn test (21
). The significance level used was P
0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rat peripheral blood experiments
The aneugens, vinblastine, vincristine and colchicine, were applied i.p. as a single treatment with doses 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg of vinblastine; 0.025, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg of vincristine and 0.7, 1 and 1.3 mg/kg of colchicine. No statistically significant increases in micronucleus frequency were found in rat peripheral blood for all three compounds at any time point (Figures 1, 2 and 3). However, the dose of 1.3 mg/kg of colchicine was not analysed at 48 h due to the strong symptoms of toxicity and animal mortality.
|
|
|
Rat bone marrow experiments
Bone marrow experiments were performed with vinblastine, vincristine and colchicine at the same doses as the peripheral blood experiments. Bone marrow collection was performed at 48 h after the single treatment. Vinblastine at 0.5 and 1 mg/kg (Figure 4) and vincristine at 0.1 mg/kg (Figure 5) induced a clear statistically significant increase in MN-PCE in the bone marrow. The marginally elevated average MN-PCE after the treatment with colchicine at 1 mg/kg was not statistically significant and would require more animals per group to reach statistical significance given the large inter-individual variability that was observed. The dose of 1.3 mg/kg of colchicine was not analyzed due to the strong symptoms of toxicity and animal mortality (Figure 6).
|
|
|
Mouse peripheral blood experiments
After a single i.p. application of vinblastine (0.25, 0.5, 1 mg/kg), vincristine (0.025, 0.05, 0.1 mg/kg) and colchicine (0.25, 0.5, 1 mg/kg), blood collection was performed at 48 h after the treatment. The two highest doses of vinblastine (0.5, 1 mg/kg) and vincristine (0.05, 0.1 mg/kg) and 1 mg/kg of colchicine showed a clear statistically significant increase in MN-PCE% (Table 1).
|
Splenectomized rat experiments
Splenectomized Wistar Han rats were treated via single i.p. injection with 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15 mg/kg of vincristine and 0.7, 1 and 1.3 mg/kg of colchicine. Blood collection was done at 24, 30, 48 and 72 h. All three doses of vincristine (Figure 7) and 0.7, 1 mg/kg of colchicine (Figure 8) showed statistically significant increases in MN reticulocytes at 48 h after treatment. The dose of 1.3 mg/kg of colchicine was not analysed at 48 and 72 h due to the strong symptoms of toxicity and animal mortality.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One of the main advantages of the MNT is the ability to evaluate the clastogenic and aneugenic potential of compounds using the same end point in vitro and in vivo. Early studies showed that the size of micronuclei can be used as a possible parameter to distinguish clastogens (small micronuclei) from aneugens (large micronuclei) (22
In our study, we performed a comparative evaluation of the peripheral blood flow cytometry MNT in rats and mice exposed to single dose of the following aneugens: vinblastine, vincristine and colchicine. Vinca alkaloids vinblastine and vincristine are important at cancer treatment. Colchicine is mainly indicated for the treatment and prophylaxis of gout and familial Mediterranean fever.
In rat peripheral blood, no induction of micronuclei was found after single treatment with vincristine, vinblastine and colchicine. In the same time, the rat bone marrow MNT showed a clear positive effect indicating that the target organ for haemopoiesis, i.e. bone marrow, was exposed to the respective compounds. A literature review showed that vincristine, vinblastine and colchicine were previously evaluated in different experimental set-ups and showed contradictory results. A study by Wakata et al. (25
) showed inconclusive results in the peripheral blood of SpragueDawley (SD) and Fisher 344 rats after the treatment with colchicine; however, positive results were obtained in rat bone marrow. Acridine orange staining was used in this study to identify micronuclei. In a study by Hynes et al. (26
) using flow cytometry, colchicine was found negative in peripheral blood of Wistar Han rats up to 6 mg/kg after single oral or i.p. treatment. However, in peripheral blood of CD1 mice, positive results were shown at 1 and 2 mg/kg. "Study by Asano et al. (27) with CD-1 and MS/Ae mice showed increase in micronucleus frequency in mouse bone marrow at 24 h after i.p. administration of 1 mg/kg colchicine in both strains." Vinblastine was found positive in F1 mice in peripheral blood MNT by Grawe et al. (28
). Studies with vincristine using the three different moue strains CD1, MS/Ae or ICR after i.p. administration showed an increase in micronucleus frequency in bone marrow at 0.125 mg/kg in CD1 mice, 0.25 mg/kg in MS/Ae mice (29
) or 0.05 mg/kg in ICR mice (30
). It is clear from our data and the data published in the literature that it is possible to detect aneugens in mouse peripheral blood and also in mouse and rat bone marrow MNTs. However, the detection of aneugens in rat peripheral blood is still questionable. The experiments with splenectomized rats bring further evidence to the micronucleus elimination process that occurs in the rat spleen. Indeed a comparative evaluation of aneugen-induced MN-PCE frequencies in the peripheral blood of mice, normal rats and splenectomized rats indicate that the spleen plays an important role in rats but not in mice. However, in mouse and rat peripheral blood, statistically significant increases in MN-PCE frequencies were observed after exposure to clastogenic compounds (31
,32
). This difference between clastogens and aneugens suggests that the removal of the MN cells by the spleen from blood circulation of rats is probably due to the large size of micronuclei. In two studies published by Abramsson-Zetterberg et al. (33
) and Torous et al. (34
), significant increases in micronucleus frequencies were found in rat peripheral blood after vincristine administration. In the study by Abramsson-Zetterberg et al. (33
) the flow cytometry analysis of MN-PCE (using Hoechst 33342 and Thiazole Orange staining) in peripheral blood, bone marrow and spleen of SD rats showed statistically significant increase after single treatment with 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg of vincristine. In the study by Torous et al. (34
), the flow cytometry analysis of MN-PCE (using anti-CD71 antibody and PI staining) in peripheral blood of SD rats showed statistically significant increase after two treatments with 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg of vincristine. However, in these studies different rat strains (SD rats), detection methods (Hoechst 33342 and Thiazole Orange) or different number of treatments were used.
Based on our data, it was not possible to detect the expected positive aneugenic effect with flow cytometry peripheral blood MNT using Wistar Han rats and following single treatment protocol. However, multiple treatment protocols have been shown to be suitable for aneugen detection in rat peripheral blood (32
,35
,36
). This is an important issue that shows that the rat peripheral blood MNT can be integrated into chronic toxicology studies that involve repeat dosing protocols. However, the mouse peripheral blood MNT with flow cytometry using single treatment protocol is an efficient test system for the detection of aneugens. The aneugen detection in rat peripheral blood may be limited by a number of reasons, one of which is the elimination of the large MN reticulocytes by the spleen. Our results from the mouse peripheral blood and spleenectomized rats support this spleen effect. Moreover, it was suggested by MacGregor et al. (35
) that the flow cytometry analysis of the youngest fraction of reticulocytes does not reduce the eliminating effect of the spleen. The detection of aneugens in vivo can be compromised by additional parameters characteristic of aneugens that should be taken into account. Such parameters may include a very narrow dose range between genotoxic and cytotoxic effects at the target organ that may require multiple-dose applications at lower doses to assure continuous exposure to overwhelm the spleen effect. A lack of sufficiently optimized time frame between sampling times related to cell cycle delay and therefore a delay in the release in the blood circulation of MN reticulocytes is another important factor to take into account. In addition, we assume that more animals per group might be needed to avoid the large inter-individual variability observed after treatment with aneugens, e.g. colchicine.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The authors thank Renato Niggli, Dominique Pralet, Rene Schafner and Nathalie Runser for their technical assistance.
| Notes |
|---|
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +41 61 3241459; Fax: +41 61 3241274; Email: zoryana.cammerer{at}novartis.com
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-
1. Heddle JA. (1973) Rapid in-vivo test for chromosomal damage. Mutat. Res. 18:187190.[ISI][Medline]
2. Schmid W. (1975) Micronucleus test. Mutat. Res. 31:915.[ISI][Medline]
3. International Committee on Harmonisation (ICH). (1997) Harmonised Tripartite Guideline S2B. Genotoxicity: A Standard for Genotoxicity Testing of Pharmaceuticals (Adopted by CPMP, September 1997, issued as CPMP/ICH/174/95).
4. Schalm OW. (1968) Veterinary Hematology 2nd edn (Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, PA) pp. 417.
5. Von Ledebur M and Schmid W. (1973) The micronucleus test, methodological aspects. Mutat. Res. 19:109117.[ISI][Medline]
6. Schlegel R and MacGregor JT. (1984) The persistence of micronucleated erythrocytes in the peripheral-circulation of normal and splenectomized Fischer 344 ratsimplications for cytogenetic screening. Mutat. Res. 127:169174.[ISI][Medline]
7. Wintrobe MM. (1981) Clinical Hematology 8th edn (Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, PA) pp. 262.
8. MacGregor JT, Wehr CM, Gould DH. (1980) Clastogen-induced micronuclei in peripheral blood erythrocytes: the basis of an improved micronucleus test. Environ. Mutagen. 2:509514.[ISI][Medline]
9. Schlegel R and MacGregor JT. (1982) The persistence of micronuclei in peripheral-blood erythrocytesdetection of chronic chromosome breakage in mice. Mutat. Res. 104:367369.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
10. Hayashi M, Kodama Y, Awogi T, Suzuki T, Asita AO, Sofuni T. (1992) The micronucleus assay using peripheral-blood reticulocytes from mitomycin-C-treated and cyclophosphamide-treated rats. Mutat. Res. 278:209213.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
11. Holden HE, Majeska JB, Studwell D. (1997) A direct comparison of mouse and rat bone marrow and blood as target tissues in the micronucleus assay. Mutat. Res. 391:8789.[ISI][Medline]
12. Tometsko AM, Torous DK, Dertinger SD. (1993) Analysis of micronucleated cells by flow-cytometry.1. Achieving high-resolution with a malaria model. Mutat. Res. 292:129135.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
13. Dertinger SD, Torous DK, Hall NE, Tometsko CR, Gasiewicz TA. (2000) Malaria-infected erythrocytes serve as biological standards to ensure reliable and consistent scoring of micronucleated erythrocytes by flow cytometry. Mutat. Res. 464:195200.[ISI][Medline]
14. Romagna F. (1988) Improved method of preparing bone marrow micronucleus slides: fractionation of a pure PE and NE population from rodent bone marrow. Mutat. Res. 206:307309.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
15. Romagna F and Staniforth CD. (1989) The automated bone marrow micronucleus test. Mutat. Res. 213:91104.[ISI][Medline]
16. Milliken GA and Johnson DE. (1992) Analysis of Messy Data, Volume 1: Design of Experiments(Chapman & Hall, London) pp. 1923.
17. Anderson VL and McLean RA. (1974) Design of Experiments: A Realistic Aproach(Marcel Dekkar, New York) pp. 1622.
18. Kempthorne O. (1960) The Design and Analysis of Experiments(John Wiley, New York).
19. Dunnett CW. (1955) A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 50:10961121.[CrossRef][ISI]
20. Kruskal WH and Wallis WA. (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion analysis of variance. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47:583621.[CrossRef]
21. Miller RG. (1966) Simultaneous Statistical Inference(McGraw Hill, New York).
22. Yamamoto KI and Kikuchi Y. (1980) A comparison of diameter of micronuclei induced by clastogens and by spindel poisons. Mutat. Res. 71:127131.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
23. Högstedt B and Karlsson A. (1985) The size of micronuclei in human lymphocytes varies according to inducing agent used. Mutat. Res. 156:229232.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
24. Ferguson LR, Morcombe P, Triggs CN. (1993) The size of cytokinesis-blocked MN in human peripheral blood lymphocytes as a measure of aneuploidy induction by a set compounds in the EEC trial. Mutat. Res. 287:101112.[ISI][Medline]
25. Wakata A, Miyamae Y, Sato S, Suzuki T, Morita T, Asano N, Awogi T, Kondo K, Hayashi M. (1998) Evaluation of the rat micronucleus test with bone marrow and peripheral blood: summary of the 9th collaborative study by CSGMT/JEMS Center Dot MMS. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 32:84100.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
26. Hynes GM, Torous DK, Tometsko CR, Burlinson B, Gatehouse DG. (2002) The single laser flow cytometric micronucleus test: a time course study using colchicine and urethane in rat and mouse peripheral blood and acetaldehyde in rat peripheral blood. Mutagenesis 17:1523.
27. Asano N, Morita T, Watanabe Y. (1989) Micronucleus test with colchicine given by intraperitoneal injection and oral gavage. Mutat. Res. 223:391394.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
28. Grawe J, Nüsse M, Adler I. (1997) Quantitative and qualitative studies of micronucleus induction in mouse erythrocytes using flow cytometry. I. Measurement of micronucleus induction in peripheral blood polychromatic erythrocytes by chemicals with known and suspected genotoxicity. Mutagenesis 12:18.
29. Ohuchida A, Furukawa A, Kondo Y, Ono T, Nito S. (1989) Micronucleus test with vincristine administered by intraperitoneal injection and oral gavage. Mutat. Res. 223:395398.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
30. Maier P and Schmid W. (1976) Ten model mutagens evaluated by the microunucleus test. Mutat. Res. 40:325338.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
31. De Boeck M, Van der Leede BJ, Van Goethem F, De Smedt A, Steemans M, Lampo A, Vanparys P. (2005) Flow cytometric analysis of micronucleated reticulocytes: time- and dose-dependent response of known mutagens in mice, using multiple blood sampling. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 46:3042.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
32. Cammerer Z, Elhajouji A, Suter W. (2007) In vivo micronucleus test with flow cytometry after acute and chronic exposures of rats to chemicals. Mutat. Res. 626:2633.[Medline]
33. Abramsson-Zetterberg L, Grawe J, Zetterberg G. (1999) The micronucleus test in rat erythrocytes from bone marrow, spleen and peripheral blood: the response to low doses of ionizing radiation, cyclophosphamide and vincristine determined by flow cytometry. Mutat. Res. 423:113124.[ISI][Medline]
34. Torous DK, Hall NE, Murante FG, Gleason SE, Tometsko CR, Dertinger SD. (2003) Comparative scoring of micronucleated reticulocytes in rat peripheral blood by flow cytometry and microscopy. Toxicol. Sci. 74:309314.
35. MacGregor JT, Bishop ME, McNamee JP, et al. (2006) Flow cytometric analysis of micronuclei in peripheral blood reticulocytes: II. An efficient method of monitoring chromosomal damage in the rat. Toxicol. Sci. 94:92107.
36. Recio L, Caspary W, Torous D, Livanos E, Kissling G, Witt K. (2006) Dose-response comparison of micronucleated reticulocyte frequencies in rodent peripheral blood with four genotoxic agents by flow cytometry and slide-based enumeration. The Toxicologist CDAn official Journal of the Society of Toxicology 90:.
Received on July 20, 2006; revised on November 15, 2006; accepted on November 17, 2006.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||







