Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fenech, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fenech, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 15, No. 4, 329-336, July 2000
© 2000 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

A mathematical model of the in vitro micronucleus assay predicts false negative results if micronuclei are not specifically scored in binucleated cells or in cells that have completed one nuclear division

Michael Fenech1

CSIRO Health Sciences and Nutrition, PO Box 10041, Adelaide BC, SA 5000, Australia

A mathematical model is described that predicts the effect of altered nuclear/cell division kinetics and cytotoxicity on micronucleus expression in vitro when the micronucleus assay is performed without discriminating between cells that have divided once and cells that have not divided after genotoxic insult. The model is based on the probabilities of: (i) a viable cell completing nuclear division; (ii) micronucleus expression in a cell that completes nuclear division after genotoxic insult; (iii) a cell not dividing and surviving as a mononuclear cell; (iv) a cell dying by necrosis or apoptosis. The model predicts: (i) false negative results for relatively weak chromosome damaging agents that also inhibit nuclear division, if micronuclei are scored in mononucleated cells without discriminating between divided and non-divided cells; (ii) this tendency for a false negative result when scoring micronuclei without discriminating between non-divided and once-divided mononuclear cells increases with cell lines and culture conditions that do not result in optimal rates of nuclear division (i.e. >90% of dividing cells); (iii) the absolute increment in micronucleus frequency in binucleated cells is at least 2-fold greater than that observed in mononucleated cells when nuclear division is not inhibited and this difference increases with increasing nuclear inhibition. The number of dead cells does not influence the micronucleus frequency if only viable cells are considered when determining the micronucleus frequency ratio. The results from this model suggest that the micronucleus assay when performed by scoring mononucleated cells, without restricting the score to those cells that have divided once after genotoxic insult, is prone to produce false negative results and, therefore, cannot be considered reliable or conclusive. Scoring of micronuclei in cytokinesis-blocked binucleated cells is predicted by the model to provide consistent results under all culture conditions and based on these theoretical results should be considered the preferred choice.

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +618 8303 8880; Fax: +618 8303 8899; Email: michael.fenech{at}hsn.csiro.au


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.