Mutagenesis, Vol. 16, No. 2, 179-182,
March 2001
© 2001 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press
Industrial Genotoxicology Group (IGG): Cytotoxicity In Vitro,Royal Society of Medicine, London, UK, 6 December 1999
Gill Clare1 and
Julie Clements2
1 AstraZeneca, Loughborough and
2 Covance Laboratories, Harrogate, UK
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Some chemicals are not detectable in
in vitro genotoxicity assays
unless the concentrations tested are cytotoxic. However, excessive
toxicity often does not allow a proper evaluation of the relevant
genetic end point (CPMP/ICH, 1995

). At very low survival levels
in mammalian cells mechanisms other than direct genotoxicity
per se can lead to `positive' results that are related to cytotoxicity
and not genotoxicity. These considerations are conflicting.
They have been balanced by defining a desired level of toxicity
for the top concentrations of cytotoxic compounds in
in vitro genotoxicity tests. However, recently the appropriate level
of toxicity at the upper limit of testing in the
in vitro chromosomal
aberration test has been challenged (Galloway, 2000

).
The objective of the meeting was to consider how cells die and measurement of cytotoxicity in relation to genotoxicity testing.
 |
Mechanisms
|
|---|
Kevin Chipman (University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK) distinguished
between necrosis and apoptosis and highlighted
. . . [Full Text of this Article]
 |
Overview of how cytotoxicity is measured in each of the tests
|
|---|
 |
Practical experience
|
|---|
 |
IVCA results
|
|---|
 |
IVMNT results
|
|---|
 |
MLA results
|
|---|
 |
New/alternative ways of measuring cytotoxicity
|
|---|
 |
Summary
|
|---|
 |
References
|
|---|

CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?