Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (59)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Stetina, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collins, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Stetina, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 16, No. 4, 297-301, July 2001
© 2001 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Inter-individual differences in repair of DNA base oxidation, measured in vitro with the comet assay

Andrew R. Collins,5, Mária Dusinská,1, Eva Horváthová,2, Eann Munro, Monica Savio,3 and Rudolf Stetina,4

Rowett Research Institute, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB21 9SB, UK

There is a need for a reliable, robust and sensitive assay for DNA repair, suitable for use with human lymphocyte samples in molecular epidemiological investigations. The comet assay (single cell alkaline gel electrophoresis) has been modified to measure the ability of a simple subcellular extract of lymphocytes to carry out the initial step of repair, i.e. incision, on a DNA substrate carrying specific lesions—namely, oxidized bases introduced by visible light in the presence of photosensitizer. The cell extract is free of non-specific nuclease activity, incising DNA only if the DNA has been treated with photosensitizer and light. The activity varies between individuals, but consistency is seen between samples from each individual taken on occasions several months apart. The lack of activity of extract from Ogg1 mouse cells (deficient in the glycosylase that excises 8-oxoguanine) in this assay confirms that the activity measured is predominantly excision repair of oxidized bases. This new DNA repair assay is simple, rapid and requires only small quantities of lymphocyte extract (obtainable from 10 ml blood).

1 Permanent addresses: Institute of Preventive and Clinical Medicine, Limbová 14, 833 01 Bratislava,

2 Cancer Research Institute, Vlárska 7, 833 91 Bratislava, Slovakia,

3 Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of General Pathology, University of Pavia, Piazza Botta, 10, 27100 Pavia, Italy and

4 Purkyne Military Medical Academy, Trebesá 1575, 500 01 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
K. Vande Loock, I. Decordier, R. Ciardelli, D. Haumont, and M. Kirsch-Volders
An aphidicolin-block nucleotide excision repair assay measuring DNA incision and repair capacity
Mutagenesis, October 20, 2009; (2009) gep039v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Herrera, G. Dominguez, J. M. Garcia, C. Pena, C. Jimenez, J. Silva, V. Garcia, I. Gomez, R. Diaz, P. Martin, et al.
Differences in Repair of DNA Cross-links between Lymphocytes and Epithelial Tumor Cells from Colon Cancer Patients Measured In vitro with the Comet Assay
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2009; 15(17): 5466 - 5472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
A. Azqueta, Y. Lorenzo, and A. R. Collins
In vitro comet assay for DNA repair: a warning concerning application to cultured cells
Mutagenesis, July 1, 2009; 24(4): 379 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of ToxicologyHome page
G. Gajski and V. Garaj-Vrhovac
Radioprotective Effects of Honeybee Venom (Apis mellifera) Against 915-MHz Microwave Radiation-Induced DNA Damage in Wistar Rat Lymphocytes: In Vitro Study
International Journal of Toxicology, March 1, 2009; 28(2): 88 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
Y. Lorenzo, A. Azqueta, L. Luna, F. Bonilla, G. Dominguez, and A. R. Collins
The carotenoid {beta}-cryptoxanthin stimulates the repair of DNA oxidation damage in addition to acting as an antioxidant in human cells
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2009; 30(2): 308 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
M. Staruchova, A. R. Collins, K. Volkovova, C. Mislanova, Z. Kovacikova, J. Tulinska, A. Kocan, L. Staruch, L. Wsolova, and M. Dusinska
Occupational exposure to mineral fibres. Biomarkers of oxidative damage and antioxidant defence and associations with DNA damage and repair
Mutagenesis, July 1, 2008; 23(4): 249 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
A. R. Collins, A. A. Oscoz, G. Brunborg, I. Gaivao, L. Giovannelli, M. Kruszewski, C. C. Smith, and R. Stetina
The comet assay: topical issues
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2008; 23(3): 143 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
L. Forchhammer, E. V. Brauner, J. K. Folkmann, P. H. Danielsen, C. Nielsen, A. Jensen, S. Loft, G. Friis, and P. Moller
Variation in assessment of oxidatively damaged DNA in mononuclear blood cells by the comet assay with visual scoring
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2008; 23(3): 223 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
M. Dusinska and A. R. Collins
The comet assay in human biomonitoring: gene-environment interactions
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2008; 23(3): 191 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
E. Cordelli, A. M. Fresegna, A. D'Alessio, P. Eleuteri, M. Spano, F. Pacchierotti, and P. Villani
ReProComet: A New In Vitro Method to Assess DNA Damage in Mammalian Sperm
Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2007; 99(2): 545 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
N. Gungor, R. W.L. Godschalk, D. M. Pachen, F. J. Van Schooten, and A. M. Knaapen
Activated neutrophils inhibit nucleotide excision repair in human pulmonary epithelial cells: role of myeloperoxidase
FASEB J, August 1, 2007; 21(10): 2359 - 2367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
P. Vodicka, R. Stetina, V. Polakova, E. Tulupova, A. Naccarati, L. Vodickova, R. Kumar, M. Hanova, B. Pardini, J. Slyskova, et al.
Association of DNA repair polymorphisms with DNA repair functional outcomes in healthy human subjects
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2007; 28(3): 657 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
M. Dusinska, Z. Dzupinkova, L. Wsolova, V. Harrington, and A. R. Collins
Possible involvement of XPA in repair of oxidative DNA damage deduced from analysis of damage, repair and genotype in a human population study
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2006; 21(3): 205 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
S. A.S. Langie, A. M. Knaapen, K. J.J. Brauers, D. van Berlo, F.-J. van Schooten, and R. W.L. Godschalk
Development and validation of a modified comet assay to phenotypically assess nucleotide excision repair
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2006; 21(2): 153 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. J. Lee, N. J. Hodges, and J. K. Chipman
Interindividual Variability in Response to Sodium Dichromate-Induced Oxidative DNA Damage: Role of the Ser326Cys Polymorphism in the DNA-Repair Protein of 8-Oxo-7,8-Dihydro-2'-Deoxyguanosine DNA Glycosylase 1
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2005; 14(2): 497 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
P. Vodicka, R. Kumar, R. Stetina, S. Sanyal, P. Soucek, V. Haufroid, M. Dusinska, M. Kuricova, M. Zamecnikova, L. Musak, et al.
Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and possible links with DNA repair rates, chromosomal aberrations and single-strand breaks in DNA
Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2004; 25(5): 757 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
N. Karunasinghe, J. Ryan, J. Tuckey, J. Masters, M. Jamieson, L. C. Clarke, J. R. Marshall, and L. R. Ferguson
DNA Stability and Serum Selenium Levels in a High-Risk Group for Prostate Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2004; 13(3): 391 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
R. Alleva, M. Tomasetti, M. D. Solenghi, F. Stagni, F. Gamberini, A. Bassi, P. M. Fornasari, G. Fanelli, and B. Borghi
Lymphocyte DNA damage precedes DNA repair or cell death after orthopaedic surgery under general anaesthesia
Mutagenesis, September 1, 2003; 18(5): 423 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. R. Sparrow, J. Zhou, and B. Cai
DNA Is a Target of the Photodynamic Effects Elicited in A2E-Laden RPE by Blue-Light Illumination
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 2245 - 2251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
A. R. Collins, V. Harrington, J. Drew, and R. Melvin
Nutritional modulation of DNA repair in a human intervention study
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2003; 24(3): 511 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
A. Collins and V. Harrington
Repair of oxidative DNA damage: assessing its contribution to cancer prevention
Mutagenesis, November 1, 2002; 17(6): 489 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
S.J. Duthie, L. Pirie, A.McE. Jenkinson, and S. Narayanan
Cryopreserved versus freshly isolated lymphocytes in human biomonitoring: endogenous and induced DNA damage, antioxidant status and repair capability
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2002; 17(3): 211 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.