Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Decordier, I.
Right arrow Articles by Kirsch-Volders, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Decordier, I.
Right arrow Articles by Kirsch-Volders, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 17, No. 4, 337-344, July 2002
© 2002 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Elimination of micronucleated cells by apoptosis after treatment with inhibitors of microtubules

Ilse Decordier1,3, Lubina Dillen1, Enrico Cundari2 and Micheline Kirsch-Volders1

1 Laboratory for Cell Genetics, Free University of Brussels, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium and 2 Centro di Genetica Evoluzionistica CNR, Via degli Apuli 4, I-00185 Rome, Italy

Two major mechanisms responsible for chromosome segregation errors are non-disjunction and chromosome loss, both leading to aneuploidy. Previous studies in our laboratory showed the existence of thresholds for the induction of chromosome non-disjunction and chromosome loss and the induction of apoptosis by microtubule inhibitors. From a mechanistic point of view one can expect that apoptosis contributes to the elimination of cells with premutagenic/mutagenic lesions. If aneuploid cells were eliminated by the induction of apoptosis below the threshold concentrations for chromosome loss and non-disjunction, the defined thresholds would not be applicable to cells unable to undergo apoptosis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether apoptosis was induced directly or indirectly as a response to aberrant chromosome segregation below the thresholds for the induction of chromosome loss and non-disjunction, as previously defined by us. Therefore, human lymphocytes were exposed in vitro to five concentrations of nocodazole and five concentrations of carbendazim representing the threshold concentrations for chromosome non-disjunction and chromosome loss, two concentrations below the lowest threshold and one concentration between the two threshold values. After 48 h exposure to the aneugens, induction of apoptosis was analysed by the annexin-V test. The frequencies of chromosome non-disjunction and chromosome loss were estimated in cytokinesis-blocked human lymphocytes in combination with FISH; this methodology was applied to whole cell cultures as well as to apoptotic and viable cell fractions obtained using magnetic annexin microbead cell sorting. Our results suggest that elimination of aneuploid cells does occur. However, the efficiency of disappearance of micronucleated cells is higher than for cells presenting chromosome non-disjunction. The correlation found between early apoptotic events and micronucleus formation could account, at least in part, for the specific elimination of aneuploid cells.

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +32 2 629 34 27; Fax: +32 2 629 27 59; Email: idecordi{at}vub.ac.be

received on March 25, 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
J. Muller, I. Decordier, P. H. Hoet, N. Lombaert, L. Thomassen, F. Huaux, D. Lison, and M. Kirsch-Volders
Clastogenic and aneugenic effects of multi-wall carbon nanotubes in epithelial cells
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2008; 29(2): 427 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. Bonassi, A. Znaor, M. Ceppi, C. Lando, W. P. Chang, N. Holland, M. Kirsch-Volders, E. Zeiger, S. Ban, R. Barale, et al.
An increased micronucleus frequency in peripheral blood lymphocytes predicts the risk of cancer in humans
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2007; 28(3): 625 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. Fukushima, A. Kinoshita, R. Puatanachokchai, M. Kushida, H. Wanibuchi, and K. Morimura
Hormesis and dose-response-mediated mechanisms in carcinogenesis: evidence for a threshold in carcinogenicity of non-genotoxic carcinogens
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2005; 26(11): 1835 - 1845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
I. Decordier, E. Cundari, and M. Kirsch-Volders
Influence of caspase activity on micronuclei detection: a possible role for caspase-3 in micronucleation
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2005; 20(3): 173 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
F. Sun, I. Betzendahl, F. Pacchierotti, R. Ranaldi, J. Smitz, R. Cortvrindt, and U. Eichenlaub-Ritter
Aneuploidy in mouse metaphase II oocytes exposed in vivo and in vitro in preantral follicle culture to nocodazole
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2005; 20(1): 65 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
H. M. Bolt and G. H. Degen
Human Carcinogenic Risk Evaluation, Part II: Contributions of the EUROTOX Specialty Section for Carcinogenesis
Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2004; 81(1): 3 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
C. Rosefort, E. Fauth, and H. Zankl
Micronuclei induced by aneugens and clastogens in mononucleate and binucleate cells using the cytokinesis block assay
Mutagenesis, July 1, 2004; 19(4): 277 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
H. Norppa and G. C.-M. Falck
What do human micronuclei contain?
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2003; 18(3): 221 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.