Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cortés, F.
Right arrow Articles by Pastor, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cortés, F.
Right arrow Articles by Pastor, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 18, No. 2, 105-112, March 2003
© 2003 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press


REVIEW

Induction of endoreduplication by topoisomerase II catalytic inhibitors

Felipe Cortés1 and Nuria Pastor

Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biology, University of Seville, Av. Reina Mercedes, 6, E-41012 Seville, Spain

The striking phenomenon of endoreduplication has long attracted attention from cytogeneticists and researchers into cell cycle enzymology and dynamics alike. Because of the variety of agents able to induce endoreduplication and the various cell types where it has been described, until now no clear or unique mechanism of induction of this phenomenon, rare in animals but otherwise quite common in plants, has been proposed. Recent years, however, have witnessed the unfolding of a number of essential physiological roles for DNA topoisomerase II, with special emphasis on its major role in mitotic chromosome segregation after DNA replication. In spite of the lack of mammalian mutants defective in topoisomerase II as compared with yeast, experiments with inhibitors of the enzyme have supported the hypothesis that this crucial untangling of daughter DNA molecules by passing an intact helix through a transient double-stranded break carried out by the enzyme, when it fails, leads to aberrant mitosis that results in endoreduplication, polyploidy and eventually cell death. Anticancer drugs that interfere with topoisomerase II can be classified into two groups. The classical poisons act by stabilizing the enzyme in the so-called cleavable complex and result in DNA damage, which represents a problem in the study of endoreduplication. The true catalytic inhibitors, which are not cleavable complex stabilizers, allow us to use doses efficient in the induction of endoreduplication while eliminating high levels of DNA and chromosome damage. This review will discuss the basic and applied aspects of this as yet scarcely explored field.

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +34 954 557039; Fax: +34 954 610261; Email: cortes{at}us.es


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
S. Kinkley, H. Staege, G. Mohrmann, G. Rohaly, T. Schaub, E. Kremmer, A. Winterpacht, and H. Will
SPOC1: a novel PHD-containing protein modulating chromatin structure and mitotic chromosome condensation
J. Cell Sci., August 15, 2009; 122(16): 2946 - 2956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
G. Cantero, C. Campanella, S. Mateos, and F. Cortes
Topoisomerase II inhibition and high yield of endoreduplication induced by the flavonoids luteolin and quercetin
Mutagenesis, September 1, 2006; 21(5): 321 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
A. Maralhas, A. Monteiro, C. Martins, M. Kranendonk, A. Laires, J. Rueff, and A. S. Rodrigues
Genotoxicity and endoreduplication inducing activity of the food flavouring eugenol
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2006; 21(3): 199 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.