Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gooderham, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gooderham, N. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis, Vol. 18, No. 3, 259-264, May 2003
© 2003 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Evaluating the genetic toxicology of DNA-based products using existing genetic toxicology assays

Catherine C. Smith, Anthony M. Lynch1 and Nigel J. Gooderham2

Molecular Toxicology, Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College School of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2AZ, UK and 1 Genetic Toxicology, GlaxoSmithKline, Ware, Herts SG12 0DP, UK

Unlike the development of drugs based on small chemical entities there are no conventional regulatory toxicity studies established for DNA-based products. As the potential for insertional mutagenesis is of particular concern for gene therapy, we have investigated the mutagenicity of model non-viral DNA-based products at the HPRT locus in Chinese hamster V79 cells. Cultures were transfected with a pL3112BSKS plasmid in combination with a number of non-viral transfection facilitators: Effectene, Lipofectamine 2000 and ExGen 500. The plasmid contains a green fluorescent protein gene, which was used as a reporter of transfection efficiency. Flow cytometry was used to analyse large numbers of cells. Small scale transient transfection efficiencies (7–90%) were obtained at low cytotoxicity, however, scaling up the process led to decreased transfection and increased cytotoxicity. Stable transfection (chromosomal) was observed, but only at very low levels (<1.5%). Two of the non-viral delivery facilitators (Effectene and ExGen 500) themselves induced mutation at the HPRT locus, although they were considerably less potent than the positive control ethyl methanesulphonate. In transfection experiments, neither of the non-viral delivery facilitators (Effectene and Lipofectamine 2000) had a mutagenic effect, whereas with ExGen 500 there was evidence of a mutagenic effect, consistent with the mutagenicity observed with the non-viral transfection facilitator alone. Moreover, treatment with the plasmid pL3112BSKS itself was able to induce a 3- to 7-fold increase in the mutation frequency at the HPRT locus. Our studies highlight some of the problems associated with using exisiting genetic toxicology testing procedures for the assessment of DNA-based products used in novel gene therapy approaches. However, given the limited level of sophistication of the current approach, the data suggest that non-viral gene therapy may present a detectable mutation risk and more appropriate testing strategies are needed to evaluate the nature of the risk.

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 020 7594 3188; Fax: +44 020 7594 3050; Email: n.gooderham{at}ic.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
F. L. Martin and K. T. Semple
Environmental health impacts: occurrence, exposure and significance, Lancaster University, UK, 9-10 September 2003
Mutagenesis, September 1, 2004; 19(5): 423 - 429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.