Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alleva, R.
Right arrow Articles by Borghi, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alleva, R.
Right arrow Articles by Borghi, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis vol. 18 no. 5 pp. 423-428, September 2003
© 2003 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Lymphocyte DNA damage precedes DNA repair or cell death after orthopaedic surgery under general anaesthesia

Renata Alleva1,6, Marco Tomasetti2, Maria D. Solenghi3, Francesca Stagni1, Flavio Gamberini4, Alessandra Bassi4, Pier Maria Fornasari4, Guido Fanelli5 and Battista Borghi1

1Department of Anaesthesiology, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Via Pupilli, 40136 Bologna, Italy, 2Experimental Pathology Institute, University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy, 3Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Cardiology Hospital ‘G. Lancisi’, Ancona, Italy, 4Laboratory of Haematology and Blood Transfusion, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy and 5Department of Anaesthesiology, IRCCS Hospital, San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

Anaesthetics have gained a lot of attention for their potential mutagenic/carcinogenic effects. In the present study we have investigated the genotoxicity of the inhalation anaesthetic sevoflurane on DNA of lymphocytes isolated from 20 patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. The genotoxicity of the anaesthetic was studied by assaying DNA damage, apoptosis, DNA repair enzyme activity and GSH content in peripheral lymphocytes before, 15 min after anaesthesia and 24 h after surgery. Lymphocytes isolated 15 min after anaesthesia showed an increase in oxidized purine and pyrimidine bases without DNA strand break formation. DNA strand breaks occurred on the first post-operative day, associated with an enhancement of DNA repair activity and a decrease in GSH. Formation of strand breaks could be the consequence of DNA repair activity. In fact, at 24 h after surgery most of the oxidized DNA bases were repaired. When DNA damage was not repaired, activation of the cell cycle checkpoint protein p53 could lead to apoptosis. An altered redox status may contribute to lymphocytopenia due to an apoptotic event as a consequence of surgical trauma. The presence of apoptotic cells at 1 day after surgery could support the hypothesis that highly damaged peripheral lymphocytes are committed to undergo programmed cell death if the damage is not repaired. In conclusion, the actual risk from anaesthesia is presumably extremely small. However, these findings contribute to our understanding of the regulation of DNA damage/repair and cell death.

6To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +39 051 6366344; Fax: +39 051 6366137; Email: renalle{at}libero.it


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
M. Chandrasekhar, P. V. Rekhadevi, N. Sailaja, M. F. Rahman, J. P. Reddy, M. Mahboob, and P. Grover
Evaluation of genetic damage in operating room personnel exposed to anaesthetic gases
Mutagenesis, July 1, 2006; 21(4): 249 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.