Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thust, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kaina, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thust, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kaina, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis vol. 19 no. 1 pp. 27-33, January 2004
© 2004 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Cytogenetic detection of a trans-species bystander effect: induction of sister chromatid exchanges in murine 3T3 cells by ganciclovir metabolized in HSV thymidine kinase gene-transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells

R. Thust3, M.T. Tomicic1, R. Gräbner2, C. Friedrichs, P. Wutzler and B. Kaina1

Institute of Virology and Antiviral Therapy, Medical Faculty, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Winzerlaer Strasse 10, D-07745 Jena, Germany, 1Division of Applied Toxicology, Institute of Toxicology, Medical Faculty, University of Mainz, D-55131 Mainz, Germany and 2Center of Vascular Biology and Medicine, Medical Faculty, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, D-99089 Erfurt, Germany

Due to the very limited transduction capacity of hitherto available vectors, the success of gene therapy of tumours by means of suicide genes has so far essentially depended on the transfer of toxic drug metabolites from transduced (metabolizing) cells to adjacent non-transduced cells via gap junctions (bystander effect). Most experimental systems for the detection of a bystander effect yield net data of cell losses and cannot differentiate between killed transduced versus killed bystander cells. Here we report on metabolic cooperation in vitro between CHO cells stably transfected with the thymidine kinase gene of herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSVtk) (metabolizing cells) and Swiss albino 3T3 cells (bystander cells). Both cell lines are readily distinguishable by single cell and colony morphology and by their chromosomal constitution. While 3T3 cells cultured alone were refractory to the antiviral drug ganciclovir (GCV), co-culture with CHO-HSVtk+ cells led to a dramatic reduction in plating efficiency as well as to a 4-fold increase in sister chromatid exchange rates induced by very low GCV concentrations in the 3T3 bystander cells. The modulator of gap junctional cooperation, all-trans retinoic acid, caused a strong augmentation of the bystander effect, while 18{alpha}-glycyrrhetinic acid, an inhibitor of gap junctional communication, drastically diminished the toxicity of GCV in the bystander cells. Whereas CHO-HSVtk+ cells showed a distinct immunoreactivity for connexin43 in the cell membranes, 3T3 cells were almost negative. The co-culture system described here allows unequivocal distinction between metabolizing and bystander cells. In this way, mechanistic aspects of the transfer of genotoxic/cytotoxic metabolites to cells, which per se are unable to form them, become accessible to investigation.

3To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +49 3641 657316; Fax: +49 3641 657300; Email: rudolf.thust{at}med.uni-jena.de
The first two authors contributed equally to this work

Received on April 17, 2003; revised on October 24, 2003; accepted on October 27, 2003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
A. Leri, J. Kajstura, and P. Anversa
Cardiac Stem Cells and Mechanisms of Myocardial Regeneration
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2005; 85(4): 1373 - 1416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.