Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, L.S.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, L.S.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, M. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis vol. 19 no. 4 pp. 263-268, July 2004
© 2004 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Loss of P53 heterozygosity is not responsible for the small colony thymidine kinase mutant phenotype in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells

L.Scott Clark, Karen Harrington-Brock1, Jianyong Wang2, Linda Sargent3, David Lowry3, Steve H. Reynolds3 and Martha M. Moore1,2

University of North Carolina Curriculum in Toxicology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 1Environmental Carcinogenesis Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA, 2Division of Genetic and Reproductive Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA and 3Toxicology and Molecular Biology Branch, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA

The mouse lymphoma L5178Y Tk+/– 3.7.2C assay is a well-characterized in vitro system used for the study of somatic cell mutation. It was determined that this cell line has a heterozygous mutation in exon 5 of Trp53. Based on this assumption that the cell line is heterozygous for the Trp53 gene, it was postulated that the small colony thymidine kinase (Tk) mutant phenotype may be due to a newly induced mutation/deletion in both the Trp53 and Tk1 alleles. The resultant Tk–/– mutants would also be Trp53+/0 or Trp53+/+ and would lose their ability to grow at normal rates. Subsequently, we published our evaluation of the Trp53 status in L5178Y cells. This analysis included sequencing of Trp53 exon 4 and determined that the mouse lymphoma cell line has a mutation in both of the Trp53 alleles and, therefore, no wild-type Trp53 allele in either Tk+/– cells or Tk–/– mutants. Because the cells have no wild-type Trp53, it is not possible that the small colony phenotype results from a newly induced loss of both functional Trp53 and Tk. To determine whether small colonies might, however, include the deletion of both Trp53 and Tk we evaluated, using microsatellite marker analysis, a series of small colony mutants. We also utilized in situ hybridization to determine that the Trp53 alleles are, in fact, in their normal chromosome 11 location in Tk+/– 3.7.2C mouse lymphoma cells. From all of these analyses we can conclude that the small colony mutant phenotype is not caused by deletion of both Trp53 and Tk1.

4To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Division of Genetic and Reproductive Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, HFT 120, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA. Tel: +1 870 543 7050; Fax: +1 870 543 7393; Email: mmmoore{at}nctr.fda.gov

Received on August 16, 2002; revised on February 6, 2004; accepted on March 5, 2004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. Wang, J. R. Sawyer, L. Chen, T. Chen, M. Honma, N. Mei, and M. M. Moore
The Mouse Lymphoma Assay Detects Recombination, Deletion, and Aneuploidy
Toxicol. Sci., May 1, 2009; 109(1): 96 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.