Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krishnaja, A.P.
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, N.K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krishnaja, A.P.
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, N.K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis vol. 19 no. 4 pp. 299-305, July 2004
© 2004 UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press

Transmission of {gamma}-ray-induced unstable chromosomal aberrations through successive mitotic divisions in human lymphocytes in vitro

A.P. Krishnaja1 and N.K. Sharma

Genetic Toxicology and Chromosome Studies Section, Radiation Biology and Health Sciences Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, India

Transmission of unstable chromosomal aberrations through successive mitotic divisions M1–M4 was analysed in 3 Gy {gamma}-ray-irradiated G0 human lymphocytes in vitro, harvested at 50, 72 and 96 h. Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation and subsequently the fluorescence plus Giemsa (FPG) method allowed the cell cycle status of each cell scored to be ascertained. Higher dicentric frequencies were observed in cells within the same post-irradiation division derived from extended culture times, indicating either a delay in cell cycle progression of aberrant cells or different lymphocyte sub-populations. The yield of complete dicentrics decreased by a factor of two in passing from M1 to M2 and showed further reductions of 26 and 44%, respectively, in moving from M2 to M3 and from M3 to M4. In the case of conventionally stained metaphases, wherein the cell cycle status does not enter the picture, the dicentric frequencies showed a reduction in yield of 39.6% at 72 h and 52.1% at 96 h compared with 50 h, because the cells analysed comprise a mixture of metaphases in different cell cycles. In the FPG stained first division metaphases, 92–100% of dicentrics analysed at 50, 72 and 96 h and in the conventionally stained metaphases, 90–94, 72–84 and 54–80% of dicentrics analysed at 50, 72 and 96 h respectively were complete dicentrics (with fragments). In the M1, M2, M3 and M4 metaphases analysed, 92–100, 50–89, 20–70 and 10–50% of dicentrics, respectively, were complete dicentrics and 55–75, 53–68, 43–57 and 36–50% excess acentrics, respectively, were seen in cells with complete dicentrics. Interindividual variation was observed in cell cycle kinetics, radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus frequencies. A salient feature of the delayed effects was the induction of giant cells and the mirror dicentrics observed in them. The reduction in dicentric frequencies due to either cell cycle delay or cell death in successive generations is aided by the multiplicity of aberrations. Bridge–breakage–fusion (BBF) events mediated by dicentric chromosomes may also be instrumental in the perpetuation of chromosomal instability.

1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +91 22 2559 3949; Fax: +91 22 2550 5151; Email address: krishnja{at}apsara.barc.ernet.in

Received on December 11, 2003; revised and; accepted on March 25, 2004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.