Skip Navigation


Mutagenesis Advance Access originally published online on August 31, 2005
Mutagenesis 2005 20(6):389-398; doi:10.1093/mutage/gei054
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/6/389    most recent
gei054v2
gei054v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, G.J.S.
Right arrow Articles by Parry, J.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, G.J.S.
Right arrow Articles by Parry, J.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


COMMENTARY

Do dose response thresholds exist for genotoxic alkylating agents?

G.J.S. Jenkins*, S.H. Doak, G.E. Johnson, E. Quick, E.M. Waters and J.M. Parry1

Swansea School of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP and 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Swansea, UK

The demonstration and acceptance of dose response thresholds for genotoxins may have substantial implications for the setting of safe exposure levels. Here we test the hypothesis that direct-acting DNA reactive agents may exhibit thresholded dose responses. We examine the potential mechanisms involved in such thresholded responses, particularly in relation to those of alkylating agents. As alkylating agents are representative model DNA reactive compounds with well characterized activities and DNA targets, they could help shed light on the general mechanisms involved in thresholded dose responses for genotoxins. Presently, thresholds have mainly been described for agents with non-DNA targets. We pay particular attention here to the contribution of DNA repair to genotoxic thresholds. A review of the literature shows that limited threshold data for alkylating agents are currently available, but the contribution of DNA repair in thresholded dose responses is suggested by several studies. The existence of genotoxic thresholds for alkylating agents methylmethanesulfonate is also supported here by data from our laboratory. Overall, it is clear that different endpoints induced by the same alkylator, can possess different dose response characteristics. This may have an impact on the setting of safe exposure levels for such agents. The limited information available concerning the dose response relationships of alkylators can nevertheless lead to the design of experiments to investigate the mechanisms that may be involved in threshold responses. Through using paired alkylators inducing different lesions, repaired by different pathways, insights into the processes involved in genotoxic thresholds may be elucidated. Furthermore, as alkyl-guanine-DNA transferase, base excision repair and mismatch repair appear to contribute to genotoxic thresholds for alkylators, cells deficient in these repair processes may possess altered dose responses compared with wild-type cells and this approach may help understand the contribution of these repair pathways to the production of thresholds for genotoxic effects in general. Finally, genotoxic thresholds are currently being described for acute exposures to single agents in vitro, however, dose response data for chronic exposures to complex mixtures are, as yet, a long way off.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 1792 295361; Fax: +44 1792 295447; Email: g.j.jenkins{at}swansea.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
E. Zeiger, L. Recio, T. R. Fennell, J. K. Haseman, R. W. Snyder, and M. Friedman
Investigation of the Low-Dose Response in the In Vivo Induction of Micronuclei and Adducts by Acrylamide
Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2009; 107(1): 247 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. A. Lichtman
Is There an Entity of Chemically Induced BCR-ABL-Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia?
Oncologist, June 1, 2008; 13(6): 645 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
M. Malmlof, G. Paajarvi, J. Hogberg, and U. Stenius
Mdm2 as a Sensitive and Mechanistically Informative Marker for Genotoxicity Induced by Benzo[a]pyrene and Dibenzo[a,l]pyrene
Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2008; 102(2): 232 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
G. Speit, P. Schutz, J. Hogel, and O. Schmid
Characterization of the genotoxic potential of formaldehyde in V79 cells
Mutagenesis, November 1, 2007; 22(6): 387 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
L. H. Pottenger, J. S. Bus, and B. B. Gollapudi
Genetic Toxicity Assessment: Employing the Best Science for Human Safety Evaluation Part VI: When Salt and Sugar and Vegetables Are Positive, How Can Genotoxicity Data Serve to Inform Risk Assessment?
Toxicol. Sci., August 1, 2007; 98(2): 327 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. H. Doak, G. J.S. Jenkins, G. E. Johnson, E. Quick, E. M. Parry, and J. M. Parry
Mechanistic Influences for Mutation Induction Curves after Exposure to DNA-Reactive Carcinogens
Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 67(8): 3904 - 3911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.