Skip Navigation


Mutagenesis Advance Access originally published online on December 2, 2006
Mutagenesis 2007 22(1):5-13; doi:10.1093/mutage/gel052
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/1/5    most recent
gel052v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tweats, D.J.
Right arrow Articles by Carmichael, P.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tweats, D.J.
Right arrow Articles by Carmichael, P.L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Determination of genetic toxicity and potential carcinogenicity in vitro—challenges post the Seventh Amendment to the European Cosmetics Directive

D.J. Tweats*, A.D. Scott1, C. Westmoreland1 and P.L. Carmichael1

The Medical School, University of Wales Swansea Singleton Park, SA2 8PP, UK 1 Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever Sharnbrook, MK44 1LQ, UK

Genetic toxicology and its role in the detection of carcinogens is currently undergoing a period of reappraisal. There is an increasing interest in developing alternatives to animal testing and the three R's of reduction, refinement and replacement are the basis for EU and national animal protection laws the Seventh Amendment to the EU Cosmetics Directive will ban the marketing of cosmetic/personal care products that contain ingredients that have been tested in animal models. Thus in vivo tests such as the bone marrow micronucleus test, which has a key role in current testing strategies for genotoxicity, will not be available for this class of products. The attrition rate for new, valuable and safe chemicals tested in an in vitro-only testing battery, using the in vitro tests currently established for genotoxicity screening, will greatly increase once this legislation is in place. In addition there has been an explosion of knowledge concerning the cellular and molecular events leading to carcinogenesis. This knowledge has not yet been fully factored into screening chemicals for properties that are not directly linked to mutation induction. Thus there is a pressing need for new, more accurate approaches to determine genotoxicity and carcinogenicity. However, a considerable challenge is presented for these new approaches to be universally accepted and new tests sufficiently validated by March 2009 when the animal testing and marketing bans associated with the Seventh Amendment are due to come into force. This commentary brings together ideas and approaches from several international workshops and meetings to consider these issues.

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel/Fax: +77 423 37093; Email: david{at}tweats.fslife.co.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 International Journal of ToxicologyHome page
X. Liu, J. A. Kramer, Y. Hu, J. M. Schmidt, J. Jiang, and A. G. E. Wilson
Development of a High-Throughput Human HepG2 Dual Luciferase Assay for Detection of Metabolically Activated Hepatotoxicants and Genotoxicants
International Journal of Toxicology, May 1, 2009; 28(3): 162 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.