Skip Navigation


Mutagenesis Advance Access originally published online on November 14, 2008
Mutagenesis 2009 24(2):143-148; doi:10.1093/mutage/gen060
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/2/143    most recent
gen060v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rombaldi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Erdtmann, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rombaldi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Erdtmann, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Occupational risk assessment of genotoxicity and oxidative stress in workers handling anti-neoplastic drugs during a working week

Fernanda Rombaldi1, Carina Cassini1, Mirian Salvador1, Jenifer Saffi2,* and Bernardo Erdtmann1,3

1Instituto de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil 2Laboratório de Genética Toxicológica/Curso de Farmácia, Universidade Luterana do Brasil (ULBRA), Canoas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil 3Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Bilogia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil

Twenty pharmacists and nurses handling anti-neoplastic drugs in a hospital were monitored during a working week, from Monday to Friday, in the morning (only on Monday) and afternoon (all days). Genotoxicity was analysed by the comet assay and the micronucleus (MN) test, while oxidative stress was analysed in serum by thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and by measurements of the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (Sod) and catalase (Cat). The exposed workers presented increased DNA damage levels by the comet assay as compared to the controls. The comet assay results have also shown significant positive correlation with the day of the week and with alcohol consumption. MN frequency was significantly higher in the exposed workers and presented noteworthy correlation with age and working time. In the oxidative stress parameters, only Cat presented a significant increase in the exposed group, considering all the samplings. However, TBARS data showed interesting results, considering the different sampling times; the exposed group presented a significant correlation with the working days and significantly higher results on Friday as compared to the controls and Monday morning. Monitoring occupational risk during a longer time, e.g. during a working week as done in this study, introduces additional aspects of risk behaviour, which can improve risk management. This study demonstrates the usefulness of evaluating oxidative stress also in genotoxic risk assessment since both events often result from the same factors.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Universidade Luterana do Brasil, Laboratório de Genética Toxicológica, Av Farroupilha 8001, sala 122 prédio 01, CEP 92425-900, Canoas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Tel: +55 51 34774000; Fax: +55 51 3477 9214; Email: jenifer.saffi{at}ulbra.br

Received on May 21, 2008; revised on September 22, 2008; accepted on September 23, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.