Skip Navigation



Mutagenesis Advance Access published online on February 8, 2005

Mutagenesis, doi:10.1093/mutage/gei010
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/1/65    most recent
gei010v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sun, F.
Right arrow Articles by Eichenlaub-Ritter, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sun, F.
Right arrow Articles by Eichenlaub-Ritter, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mutagenesis © UK Environmental Mutagen Society 2005; all rights reserved.
Received December 1, 2004
Revised January 12, 2005
Accepted January 13, 2005

Original article

Aneuploidy in mouse metaphase II oocytes exposed in vivo and in vitro in preantral follicle culture to nocodazole

Fengyun Sun 1, Ilse Betzendahl 1, Francesca Pacchierotti 2, Roberto Ranaldi 2, Johan Smitz 3, Rita Cortvrindt 3, and Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter 1*

1 Institute of Genetechnology/Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bielefeld, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany
2 Section of Toxicology and Biomedical Sciences, ENEA CR Casaccia, I-00060 Rome, Italy
3 EggCentris NV, Kranenberg 6, B-1731 Zellik, Belgium, Free University Brussels, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter, E-mail: EIRI{at}uni-bielefeld.de


   Abstract

Aneuploidy tests are important in evaluating genetic hazards especially when chemical exposures are suspected to affect the fidelity of chromosome segregation in oocytes and embryos. In the current study, a newly established method, mouse preantral follicle culture, was employed to grow oocytes in vitro within follicles. The sensitivity of in vitro grown follicle enclosed oocytes was compared with oocytes maturing in vivo in the ovary. In both the cases, oocytes were exposed to the cytostatic chemical, nocodazole, from the time of hormonally stimulated resumption of meiosis. The in vivo study revealed a significant decrease in the number of ovulated mouse oocytes and an increase in meiosis I-arrested and hyperploid metaphase II oocytes at a single i.p. dose of 70 mg/kg body weight of nocodazole. A significant increase was also observed in the number of meiosis I-arrested and hyperploid mouse oocytes from preantral follicle culture, when they were cultured in the presence of ≥30 nM nocodazole during the final stages of maturation. This concentration is slightly lower than that previously shown to induce nondisjunction in denuded mouse oocytes or in cultured human lymphocytes. The higher sensitivity of the in vitro matured oocytes from preantral follicle culture than that of denuded oocytes may be related to a synergistic adverse influence of nocodazole on the oocyte, on somatic cell integrity and on cell-cell communication, which possibly also affects ovulation in vivo. When expressed in molarity relative to the mouse weight, the effective dose of the acute exposure in vivo is 3-4 orders of magnitude higher than the lowest effective concentration employed continuously in vitro. Reduced bioavailability of nocodazole to the target cells due to its poor water solubility may contribute to this difference. Preantral follicle culture can be helpful in analysing mechanisms in chemically induced aneuploidy in mammalian oogenesis, and in predicting the consequences of chemical exposures in vivo.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.