Skip Navigation



Mutagenesis Advance Access published online on June 17, 2009

Mutagenesis, doi:10.1093/mutage/gep014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/4/341    most recent
gep014v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eastmond, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vickers, C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eastmond, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vickers, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© World Health Organization, 2009. All rights reserved. The World Health Organization has granted the publisher permission for the reproduction of this article.

Mutagenicity testing for chemical risk assessment: update of the WHO/IPCS Harmonized Scheme

David A. Eastmond, Andrea Hartwig1, Diana Anderson2, Wagida A. Anwar3, Michael C. Cimino4, Ivan Dobrev5, George R. Douglas6, Takehiko Nohmi7, David H. Phillips8 and Carolyn Vickers9,*

Environmental Toxicology Graduate Program, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA 1Institut für Lebensmitteltechnologie und Lebensmittelchemie, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany 2Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK 3Department of Community, Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Abassya, Cairo, Egypt 4Risk Assessment Division, Science Support Branch, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA 5Department of Chemical Risk Assessment, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hanover, Germany 6Mechanistic Studies Division, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 7Division of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, Tokyo, Japan 8Section of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK 9International Programme on Chemical Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

Since the publication of the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) Harmonized Scheme for Mutagenicity Testing, there have been a number of publications addressing test strategies for mutagenicity. Safety assessments of substances with regard to genotoxicity are generally based on a combination of tests to assess effects on three major end points of genetic damage associated with human disease: gene mutation, clastogenicity and aneuploidy. It is now clear from the results of international collaborative studies and the large databases that are currently available for the assays evaluated that no single assay can detect all genotoxic substances. The World Health Organization therefore decided to update the IPCS Harmonized Scheme for Mutagenicity Testing as part of the IPCS project on the Harmonization of Approaches to the Assessment of Risk from Exposure to Chemicals. The approach presented in this paper focuses on the identification of mutagens and genotoxic carcinogens. Selection of appropriate in vitro and in vivo tests as well as a strategy for germ cell testing are described.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +41 22 791 1286; Fax: +41 22 791 4848; Email: ipcsmail{at}who.int

Received on February 2, 2009; revised on April 14, 2009; accepted on April 15, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.